Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast cancer classification in pathological images based on hybrid features

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 April 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Breast cancer has become an important factor affecting human health. Diagnosis based on pathological images is considered the gold standard in the clinic. In this paper, an automatic breast cancer detection method based on hybrid features is proposed for pathological images. To obtain better segmentation results under conditions of crowded and chromatin-sparse nuclei, a 3-output convolutional neural network (CNN) is employed to segment the nuclei. Due to the weak correlation between the hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) channels, texture features are separately extracted for the two channels, which provides more representative results. From multiple perspectives, the morphological features, spatial structural features and texture features are extracted and fused. Using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier with improved generalization, the pathological image is classified as benign or malignant on the basis of the relief method for feature selection. For the University of California, Santa Barbara database (UCSB), the classification accuracy of the method is 96.7%, and the area under the curve (AUC) is 0.983. The experimental results show that the proposed method yields superior classification performance compared with existing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 09 April 2019

    The article Breast cancer classification in pathological images based on hybrid features, written by Cuiru Yu, Houjin Chen, Yanfeng Li, Yahui Peng, Jupeng Li and Fan Yang, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal (SpringerLink) on March 16, 2019 with open access.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al (2015) Breast cancer statistics. World Cancer Research Fund International. https://www.wcrf.org/int/cancer-facts-figures/data-specific-cancers/breast-cancer-statistics. Accessed 16 January 2015

  2. Veta M, van Diest PJ, Kornegoor R et al (2013) Automatic nuclei segmentation in h&e stained breast cancer histopathology images. PLoS One 8(7):e70221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Petushi S, Garcia FU, Haber MM et al (2006) Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer. BMC Med Imaging 6(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vink JP, Van Leeuwen MB, Van Deurzen CHM et al (2013) Efficient nucleus detector in histopathology images. J Microsc 249(2):124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabeena BK, Nair MS, Bindu GR (2014) Automatic segmentation and classification of mitotic cell nuclei in histopathology images based on Active Contour Model. International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics on IEEE, pp 740–744

  6. Qi X, Xing F, Foran DJ et al (2012) Robust segmentation of overlapping cells in histopathology specimens using parallel seed detection and repulsive level set. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(3):754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zucker SW (1976) Region growing: childhood and adolescence. Computer Graphics & Image Processing 5(3):382–399

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ali S, Madabhushi A (2012) An integrated region-, boundary-, shape-based active contour for multiple object overlap resolution in histological imagery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(7):1448–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabeena BK, Nair MS, Bindu GR (2016) Automatic segmentation of cell nuclei using krill herd optimization based multi-thresholding and localized active contour model. Biocybernetics & Biomedical Engineering 36(4):584–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong H, Gurcan M, Belkacem-Boussaid K (2011) Partitioning histopathological images: an integrated framework for supervised color-texture segmentation and cell splitting. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(9):1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plissiti ME, Nikou C (2012) Overlapping cell nuclei segmentation using a spatially adaptive active physical model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 21(11):4568

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang H, Han J, Borowsky A et al (2013) Invariant delineation of nuclear architecture in glioblastoma multiforme for clinical and molecular association. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(4):670–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang M, Wu T, Bennett K (2015) Small blob identification in medical images using regional features from optimum scale. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62(4):1051–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatipoglu N, Bilgin G (2017) Cell segmentation in histopathological images with deep learning algorithms by utilizing spatial relationships. Med Biol Eng Comput 55(10):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar N, Verma R, Sharma S et al (2017) A dataset and a technique for generalized nuclear segmentation for computational pathology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(7):1550–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anuranjeeta A, Shukla KK, Tiwari A et al (2017) Classification of histopathological images of breast cancerous and non cancerous cells based on morphological features. Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal 10(1):353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle S, Agner S, Madabhushi A et al (2008) Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using spectral clustering with textural and architectural image features. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano To Macro 29:496–499

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu Z, Tang J, Wang Z et al (2018) Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis - A survey. Pattern Recogn 83(2018):134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu G, Lin Z, Han J, et al (2018) Unsupervised Deep Hashing via Binary Latent Factor Models for Large-scale Cross-modal Retrieval. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 2854–2860

  20. Spanhol FA, Oliveira LS, Petitjean C et al (2016) Breast cancer histopathological image classification using Convolutional Neural Networks. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Vancouver

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Spanhol F, Oliveira L, Petitjean C et al (2016) A Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(7):1455–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bayramoglu N , Kannala J, Heikkilä J (2017) Deep learning for magnification independent breast cancer histopathology image classification. International Conference on Pattern Recognition IEEE, pp 2440–2445

  23. Spanhol F, Cavalin P, Oliveira L S, et al (2017) Deep Features for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC)

  24. Gelasca ED, Byun J, Obara B, et al (2008) Evaluation and benchmark for biological image segmentation. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp 1816–1819

  25. Li X, Plataniotis KN (2015) Color model comparative analysis for breast cancer diagnosis using H and E stained images. SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics 9420:94200L–94200L-6

    Google Scholar 

  26. He X, Han Z, Wei B (2000) Breast cancer histopathological image auto-classification using deep learning. Computer Engineering and Applications:1–000

  27. Xiangsheng Z, Hong B, Chengquan Z (2014) Pathological diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast. People’s Medical Publishing House, China

    Google Scholar 

  28. Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K et al (2001) Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. John Wiley & Sons, Inc 3(4):357–363

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. De Berg M, Van Kreveld M, Overmars M et al (2000) Computational geometry: algorithms and applications. Math Gaz 19(3):333–334

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruifrok AC, Johnston DA (2001) Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 23(4):291–299

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T et al (2008) Speeded-up robust features (surf). Computer Vision & Image Understanding 110(3):346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zulpe NS, Pawar VP (2012) Glcm textural features for brain tumor classification. International Journal of Computer Science Issues 9(3):354–359

    Google Scholar 

  33. Haraclick RM (1973) Texture Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3(6):610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tahir MA, Bouridane A, Kurugollu F (2005) An fpga based coprocessor for glcm and haralick texture features and their application in prostate cancer classification. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 43(2):205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu X (2014) Mass classification in mammogram with semi-supervised relief based feature selection. International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing, International Society for Optics and Photonics 9069:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  36. Collobert R, Bengio S, Marithoz J (2002) Torch: A Modular Machine Learning Software Library. Idiap, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  37. Otsu NA (1979) Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Veta M, Huisman A, Viergever M A, et al (2011) Marker-controlled watershed segmentation of nuclei in H&E stained breast cancer biopsy images. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano To Macro, pp 618–621

  39. Lei T, Jia X, Zhang Y et al (2018) Significantly fast and robust fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm based on morphological reconstruction and membership filtering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst PP(99):1

    Google Scholar 

  40. Argandacarreras I, Kaynig V, Rueden C et al (2017) Trainable weka segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics 33(15):2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Song Y, Li Q, Huang H, et al (2016) Histopathology Image Categorization with Discriminative Dimension Reduction of Fisher Vectors. Computer Vision - ECCV 2016 Workshops, Springer International Publishing, pp 306–317

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under no. 61872030 and no. 61571036.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanfeng Li.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised due to retrospective open access.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, C., Chen, H., Li, Y. et al. Breast cancer classification in pathological images based on hybrid features. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 21325–21345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7468-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7468-9

Keywords

Navigation