Skip to main content
Log in

Locally optimum watermark decoder in NSST domain using RSS-based Cauchy distribution

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to consider the tradeoff between imperceptibility and robustness requirements in developing an image-watermarking technique, some statistical model-based image watermarking schemes have been designed in the past decade. The effectiveness of a statistical watermark decoder depends highly on the modeling of the transform-domain coefficients and the use of hypothesis testing. In this study, a multiplicative image watermarking scheme is proposed in the nonsubsampled Shearlet transform (NSST) domain, where NSST coefficients are modeled by ranked set sample (RSS) based Cauchy statistical distribution and locally most powerful (LMP) test criterion is applied. Digital image watermarking technique consists of two parts, namely, embedding and extracting. In the embedding process, to achieve relatively good imperceptibility and robustness, watermark data is inserted into the significant NSST directional subband that has the highest energy value, by modifying nonlinearly the significant NSST coefficients. In the extracting phase, a scheme is proposed for designing a blind NSST domain watermark decoder incorporating the RSS based Cauchy statistical distribution and LMP test criterion. Here, the RSS method is used to estimate the location parameter and shape parameter of Cauchy statistical distribution instead of traditional maximum-likelihood (ML) method, which can provide the Cauchy model with higher precision parameters. Experimental results on a set of standard test images show significant improvements in imperceptibility and robustness using the proposed method compared with the best known state-of-the-art approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmaderaghi B, Kurugollu F, Rincon JMD, Bouridane A (2018) Blind image watermark detection algorithm based on discrete shearlet transform using statistical decision theory. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging 4(1):46–59

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Akhaee MA, Sahraeian SME (2015) Scaling-based watermarking with universally optimum decoder. Multimed Tools Appl 74(15):5995–6018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhaee MA, Sahraeian SME, Marvasti F (2010) Contourlet-based image watermarking using optimum detector in noisy environment. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(4):967–980

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Akhaee MA, Kalantari NK, Marvasti F (2010) Robust audio and speech watermarking using Gaussian and Laplacian modeling. Signal Process 90(8):2487–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali M, Ahn CW, Pant M (2015) An image watermarking scheme in wavelet domain with optimized compensation of singular value decomposition via artificial bee colony. Inf Sci 301:44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amini M, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2017) Digital watermark extraction in wavelet domain using hidden Markov model. Multimed Tools Appl 76(3):3731–3749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amini M, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2018) A robust multibit multiplicative watermark decoder using vector-based hidden Markov model in wavelet domain. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 28(2):402–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amini M, Sadreazami H, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2019) A channel-dependent statistical watermark detector for color images. IEEE Trans Multimed 21(1):65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amirmazlaghani M, Rezghi M, Amindavar H (2015) A novel robust scaling image watermarking scheme based on Gaussian mixture model. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):1960–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asikuzzaman M, Pickering MR (2018) An overview of digital video watermarking. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 28(9):2131–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bian Y, Liang S (2013) Locally optimal detection of image watermarks in the wavelet domain using Bessel-K form distribution. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(6):2372–2384

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Briassouli A, Tsakalides P, Stouraitis A (2005) Hidden message in heavy-tails: DCT-domain watermark detection using alpha-stable models. IEEE Trans Multimed 7(4):700–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaurasia P (2014) Biometrics minutiae detection and feature extraction. Pers Individ Differ 63(6):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chiv NN, Sinha BK, Wu Z (1995) Estimation of the location parameter of a Cauchy distribution using a ranked set sample. Metreka 42(1):234–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dong L, Yan Q, Lv Y (2017) Full band watermarking in DCT domain with Weibull model. Multimed Tools Appl 76(2):1983–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Easley G, Labate D, Lim WQ (2008) Sparse directional image representations using the discrete Shearlet transform. Appl Comput Harmon Anal 25(1):25–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Etemad S, Amirmazlaghani M (2018) A new multiplicative watermark detector in the contourlet domain using t location-scale distribution. Pattern Recogn 77:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamghalam M, Mirzakuchaki S, Akhaee MA (2014) Geometric modelling of the wavelet coefficients for image watermarking using optimum detector. IET Image Process 8(3):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hou B, Zhang X, Bu X, Feng H (2012) SAR image despeckling based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 5(3):809–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalantari NK, Ahadi SM, Vafadust M (2010) A robust image watermarking in the Ridgelet domain using universally optimum decoder. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 20(3):396–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khosravi MR, Samadi S (2019) Efficient payload communications for IoT-enabled ViSAR vehicles using discrete cosine transform-based quasi-sparse bit injection. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2019(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khosravi MR, Samadi S (2020) Reliable data aggregation in internet of ViSAR vehicles using chained dual-phase adaptive interpolation and data embedding. IEEE Internet Things J 7(4):2603–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khosravi MR, Yazdi M (2018) A lossless data hiding scheme for medical images using a hybrid solution based on IBRW error histogram computation and quartered interpolation with greedy weights. Neural Comput & Applic 30:2017–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosravi MR, Rostami H, Samadi S (2018) Enhancing the binary watermark-based data hiding scheme using an interpolation-based approach for optical remote sensing images. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst 9(2):53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwitt R, Meerwald P, Uhl A (2008) A lightweight RAO-Cauchy detector for additive watermarking in the DWT-domain. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security, New York : 33–42.

  26. Ng TM, Garg HK (2005) Maximum- likelihood detection in DWT domain image watermarking using Laplacian modeling. IEEE Signal Process Lett 12(4):285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panah AS, Van Schyndel R, Sellis T (2016) On the properties of non-media digital watermarking: a review of state of the art techniques. IEEE Access 4:2670–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qasim AF, Meziane F, Aspin R (2018) Digital watermarking: applicability for developing trust in medical imaging workflows state of the art review. Comput Sci Rev 27:45–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi HY, Zheng D, Zhao JY (2008) Human visual system based adaptive digital image watermarking. Signal Process 88(1):174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sadreazami H, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2014) A study of multiplicative watermark detection in the Contourlet domain using alpha-stable distributions. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(10):4348–4360

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadreazami H, Ahmad MO, Swamy MNS (2016) Multiplicative watermark decoder in Contourlet domain using the normal inverse Gaussian distribution. IEEE Trans Multimed 18(2):196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Song I, Kassam SA (1990) Locally optimum detection of signals in a generalized observation model: the known signal case. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 36:502–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Song I, Bae J, Kim SY (2009) Advanced theory of signal detection: weak signal detection in generalized observations. Springer Berlin, 2(2):63–64.

  34. Wang X, Liu Y, Xu H, Wang A, Yang H (2016) Blind optimum detector for robust image watermarking in nonsubsampled shearlet domain. Inf Sci 372:634–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Winkler T, Rinner B (2014) Security and privacy protection in visual sensor networks: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 47(1) 2:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61472171 & 61701212), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Nos. 2017 M621135 & 2018 T110220), Key Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (LZ2019001), Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2019-ZD-0468), and High-level Innovation Talents Foundation of Dalian (No.2017RQ055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang-yang Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, Pp., Shen, X., Song, Yf. et al. Locally optimum watermark decoder in NSST domain using RSS-based Cauchy distribution. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 33071–33101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09621-y

Keywords

Navigation