Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive Constraint Propagation for Semi-Supervised Kernel Matrix Learning

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose adaptive constraint propagation (ACP) for semi-supervised kernel matrix learning (SS-KML). SS-KML aims to learn a kernel matrix from the given samples which contains just a little supervised information such as class labels or pairwise constraints. Recently, for effective SS-KML, constraint propagation methods by semi-definite programming are being actively studied, and the representative works are pairwise constraint propagation (PCP) and kernel propagation (KP). They have used hard constraints in their frameworks for constraint propagation and achieved outstanding classification performance. However, a small set of the hard constraints sometimes cannot cover all the samples of the full data set, and thus lead to large distortions of global discriminative data structure in the learned kernel matrix. It has a negative influence on the classification performance. To deal with this problem, we provide two adaptive fidelity terms to satisfy the requirement that two must-link samples become close and two cannot-link samples become far apart. Then, we build a new framework based on them to adaptively propagate the constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that ACP outperforms state-of-the-art SS-KML methods such as PCP and KP in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aiolli F, Martino GDS, Hagenbuchner M, Sperduti A (2009) Learning nonsparse kernels by self-organizing maps for structured data. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 20(12):1938–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cozman FG, Cohen I, Cirelo MC et al (2007) Semi-supervised learning of mixture models. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 361–368

  3. Fowlkes C, Belongie S, Malik J (2004) Spectral grouping using the Nystrom method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(2):214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fowlkes C, Belongie S, Malik J (2001) Efficient spatiotemporal grouping using the nystrom method. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 231–238

  5. Gilorami M (2002) Mercer kernel-based clustering in feature space. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 13(3):780–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoi SCH, Jin R (2008) Active kernel learning. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 400–407

  8. Hoi SCH, Jin R, Lyu MR (2007) Learning nonparametric kernel matrices from pairwise constraints. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 361–368

  9. Hu E, Chen S, Zhang D, Yin X (2010) Semisupervised kernel matrix learning by kernel propagation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21(11):1831–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huiskes MJ, Lew MS (2008), The MIR flickr retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of ACM international conference on multimedia, information retrieval, pp 39–43

  11. Kulis B, Basu S, Dhillon I, Mooney R (2005) Semi-supervised graph clustering: a kernel approach. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 457–464

  12. Lazebnik S, Schmid C (2006) Ponce J. Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 2:2169–2178

  13. Likas A, Vlassis N, Verbeek JJ (2003) The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognit 36(2):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Liu J, Tang X (2008) Pairwise constraint propagation by semidefinite programming for semi-supervised classification. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 576–583

  15. Liu G, Lin Z, Yu Y (2010) Robust subspace segmentation by low-rank representation. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 663–670

  16. Martin D, Fowlkes C, Tal D, Malik J (2001) A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 416–423

  17. Ning J, Zhang L, Zhang D, Wu C (2010) Interactive image segmentation by maximal similarity based region merging. Pattern Recognit 43(2):445–456

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shang F, Liu Y, Wang F (2011) Learning spectral embedding for semi-supervised clustering. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICDM, pp 597–606

  19. Sindhwani V, Keerthi SS (2009) Newton methods for fast solution of semi-supervised linear SVMs. large scale kernel machines, Princeton, pp 155–174

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sturm JF, Romanko O, Polik I (2006) SeDuMi version 1.1R3. http://sedumi.mcmaster.ca/

  21. Tao W, Jin H, Zhang Y (2007) Color image segmentation based on mean shift and normalized cuts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 37(5):1382–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Verbeek J, Guillaumin M, Mensink T, Schmid C (2010) Image annotation with tagprop on the MIRFLICKR set. In: Proceedings of ACM international conference on multimedia, information retrieval, pp 537–546

  24. Wagsaff K, Basu S, Davidson I (2006) When is constrained clustering beneficial, and why? In: Proceedings of american association for artificial intelligence

  25. Wagsaff K, Cardie C, Rogers S, Schroedl S (2001) Constrained K-means clustering with background knowledge. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 577–584

  26. Wang F, Zhang C (2006) Label propagation through linear neighborhoods. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning, pp 985–992

  27. Yan B, Domeniconi C (2006) An adaptive kernel method for semi-supervised clustering. In: Proceedings of european conference on machine learning, pp 521–532

  28. Zelnik-Manor L, Perona P (2004) Self-tuning spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of advances in neural information processing

  29. Zhang D, Chen S, Zhou ZH, Yang Q (2008) Constraint projections for ensemble learning. In: Proceedings of AAAI, pp 758–763

  30. Zhou D, Bousquet O, Lal TN, Weston J, Schölkopf B (2004) Learning with local and global consistency. In: Proceedings of, advances in neural information processing systems, pp 321–328

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that have led to improvements in the quality and presentation of the paper. This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China (No. 2013CB329402), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61271298 and 61050110144), the Fund for Foreign Scholars in University Research and Teaching Programs (the 111 Project) (No. B07048), and the Program for Cheung Kong Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT1170).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheolkon Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jian, M., Jung, C., Shen, Y. et al. Adaptive Constraint Propagation for Semi-Supervised Kernel Matrix Learning. Neural Process Lett 41, 107–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-013-9337-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-013-9337-2

Keywords

Navigation