Skip to main content
Log in

Exponential Generalized \(H_2\) Filtering of Delayed Static Neural Networks

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the problem of generalized \(H_2\) filter design for static neural networks with time-varying delay. A double-integral inequality and the reciprocally convex combination technique are employed to handle the cross terms appeared in the time-derivative of the Lyapunov functional. An improved delay-dependent design criterion is presented by means of linear matrix inequalities. It is shown that the gain matrix of the desired filter and the optimal performance index are simultaneously achieved by solving a convex optimization problem. Moreover, the upper bound of the exponential decay rate of the filtering error system can be also easily obtained. An example with simulation is exploited to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu ZB, Qiao H, Peng J, Zhang B (2004) A comparative study of two modeling approaches in neural networks. Neural Netw 17:73–85

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Du B, Lam J (2009) Stability analysis of static recurrent neural networks using delay-partitioning and projection. Neural Netw 22:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li P, Cao J (2006) Stability in static delayed neural networks: a nonlinear measure approach. Neurocomputing 69:1776–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, Gao H, Yu X (2011) A unified approach to the stability of generalized static neural networks with linear fractional uncertainties and delays. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 41:1275–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao X, Luo Q, Zeng Z, Guo Y (2008) Global exponential stability in Lagrange sense for recurrent neural networks with time delays. Nonlinear Anal RWA 9:1535–1557

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Shao H (2010) Less conservative delay-dependent stability criteria for neural networks with time-varying delays. Neurocomputing 73:1528–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu ZG, Lam J, Su H, Chu J (2012) Stability and dissipativity analysis of static neural networks with time delay. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang XM, Han QL (2011) Global asymptotic stability for a class of generalized neural networks with interval time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22:1180–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng Z, Huang DS, Wang Z (2005) Global stability of a general class of discrete-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Process Lett 22:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozcan N (2011) A new sufficient condition for global robust stability of delayed neural networks. Neural Process Lett 34:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faydasicok O, Arik S (2013) A new upper bound for the norm of interval matrices with application to robust stability analysis of delayed neural networks. Neural Netw 44:64–71

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards PJ, Murray AF (1998) Fault tolerance via weight noise in analog VLSI implementations of MLPsA case study with EPSILON. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II 45:1255C1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang H, Feng G (2009) Delay-dependent \(H_\infty \) and generalized \(H_2\) filtering for delayed neural networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I 56:846–857

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Ho DWC, Liu X (2005) State estimation for delayed neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd S, EI Ghaoui L, Feron E, Balakrishnan V (1994) Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. He Y, Wang QG, Wu M, Lin C (2006) Delay-dependent state estimation for delayed neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17:1077–1081

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Cao J (2010) Robust state estimation for neural networks with discontinuous activations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber B 40:1425–1437

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Li T, Fei S, Zhu Q (2009) Design of exponential state estimator for neural networks with distributed delays. Nonlinear Anal RWA 10:1229–1242

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Z, Liu Y, Liu X (2009) State estimation for jumping recurrent neural networks with discrete and distributed delays. Neural Netw 22:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang D, Yu L, Wang QG, Ong CJ (2012) Estimator design for discrete-time switched neural networks with asynchronous switching and time-varying delay. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 23:827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y, Wang Z, Liu X (2012) State estimation for discrete-time neural networks with Markov-mode-dependent lower and upper bounds on the distributed delays. Neural Process Lett 36:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tseng KH, Tsai JSH, Lu CY (2012) Design of delay-dependent exponential estimator for T-S fuzzy neural networks with mixed time-varying interval delays using hybrid Taguchi-Genetic algorithm. Neural Process Lett 36:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang H, Feng G, Cao J (2011) Guaranteed performance state estimation of static neural networks with time-varying delay. Neurocomputing 74:606–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang H, Feng G, Cao J (2010) State estimation for static neural networks with time-varying delay. Neural Netw 23:1202–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ariba Y, Gouaisbaut F (2007) Delay-dependent stability analysis of linear systems with time-varying delay, in 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, UAS, pp. 2053–2058

  26. Zhang XM, Han QL (2008) Robust \(H_\infty \) filtering for a class of uncertain linear systems with time-varying delay. Automatica 44:157–166

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun J, Liu GP, Chen J, Rees D (2010) Improved delay-range-dependent stability criteria for linear sytems with time-varying delays. Automatica 46:466–470

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Park P, Ko JW, Jeong C (2011) Reciprocally convex approach to stability of systems with time-varying delays. Automatica 47:235–238

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that have greatly improved the quality of this paper. The work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61005047, and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China under Grant No. BK2010214. Also, this publication was made possible by NPRP grant #4-1162-1-181 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of Tingwen Huang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to He Huang.

Appendix A: Proof of Lemma 1

Appendix A: Proof of Lemma 1

Let \(\mathcal {T}_N=\left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} I&{}0\\ -T^{-1}N&{}I \end{array} \right] \). It is known that

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} N^TT^{-1}N&{}N^T\\ N&{}T \end{array} \right] \ge 0 \end{aligned}$$

resulting from

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {T}_N^T\left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} N^TT^{-1}N&{}N^T\\ N&{}T \end{array} \right] \mathcal {T}_N=\left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} 0&{}0\\ 0&{}T \end{array} \right] \ge 0. \end{aligned}$$

Then, one has

$$\begin{aligned} 0&\le \int \limits _{-\tau }^0\int \limits _{t+\theta }^t\left[ \begin{array}{c} \xi (t)\\ \omega (s) \end{array} \right] ^T\left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c} N^TT^{-1}N&{}N^T\\ N&{}T \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{c} \xi (t)\\ \omega (s) \end{array} \right] dsd\theta \\&= \frac{1}{2}\tau ^2\xi ^T(t)N^TT^{-1}N\xi (t)+2\xi ^T(t)N^T \int \limits _{-\tau }^0\int \limits _{t+\theta }^t\omega (s)dsd\theta \\&+\int \limits _{-\tau }^0\int \limits _{t+\theta }^t\omega ^T(s)T\omega (s)dsd\theta . \end{aligned}$$

That is, (7) holds. This completes the proof. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, H., Huang, T. & Chen, X. Exponential Generalized \(H_2\) Filtering of Delayed Static Neural Networks. Neural Process Lett 41, 407–419 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-014-9347-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-014-9347-8

Keywords

Navigation