Abstract
In order to tackle the increasing heterogeneous global Internet traffic, mixed-line-rate (MLR) optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks have emerged as the cost- and power-efficient solution. In MLR WDM networks, channels are structured as sub-bands, each of which consists of wavelengths operating at a similar data rate. By reducing the (1) spacing within a sub-band, or (2) spacing between sub-bands operating at different data rates, spectral efficiency can be improved. However, owing to high physical layer impairment levels, decrease in sub-band spacing adversely affects transmission reach of the channels, which results in higher power consumption due to requirement of increased signal regeneration. In this work, we compare power efficiency of various MLR and single-line-rate (SLR) solutions, and also investigate the trade-off that exists between spectral and power efficiency in a WDM network. Simulation results indicate that (1) for high transmission capacities, a combination of 100 Gbps transponders and 40 Gbps regenerators will obtain the highest power efficiency; (2) for long connection distances, a point of merging occurs for various SLR and MLR designs, where power consumption is independent of the frequency band distribution; and (3) for MLR systems, both spectral and power efficiency can be improved by using either shorter links with higher bandwidth assignment to 100 Gbps wavelengths, or longer links with higher bandwidth assignment to 40 Gbps wavelengths. Finally, the results indicate that focusing on spectral efficiency alone results in extra power consumption, since high quality of transmission and spectral efficiency leads to increased regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Spectral Efficiency is defined as the amount of bits per second transmitted over a given frequency band.
Power efficiency (W/bps for each modulation format) is evaluated using the total power consumption of transponders and, if required, the energy expended due to the use of 3R regenerators at selected intermediate network nodes.
References
Singh, S.P., Sengar, S., Bajpai, R., Iyer, S.: Next-Generation Variable-Line-Rate Optical WDM Networks: Issues and Challenges. J. Opt. Commun. 34(4), 331–350 (2013)
SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. http://www.theclimategroup.org/assets/resources/publications/Smart2020Report_lo_res.pdf. GESI (2008)
Nag, A., Tornatore, M., Mukherjee, B.: Optical network design with mixed line rates and multiple modulation formats. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 466–475 (2010)
Batayneh, M., Schupke, D.A., Hoffmann, M., Kirstaedter, K., Mukherjee, B.: On routing and transmission-range determination of multi-bit-rate signals over mixed-line-rate WDM optical networks for carrier ethernet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19(5), 1304–1316 (2012)
Chowdhury, P., Tornatore, M., Nag, A., Ip, E., Wang, T., Mukherjee, B.: On the design of energy-efficient mixed-line-rate (MLR) optical networks. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 30(1), 130–139 (2012)
Faure, J.P., Lavigne, B., Bresson, C., Bertran-Pardo, O., Colomer, A.C., Canto, R.: 40G and 100G deployment on 10G infrastructures: market overview and trends, coherent versus conventional technology. In: Proceedings of IEEE Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, San Diego, USA, no.OThE3 (2010)
Vizcaino, J.L., Ye, Y., Monroy, I.T.: Energy efficiency analysis for flexible-grid OFDM-based optical networks. Int. J. Comp. Telecomm. Netw. 56(10), 2400–2419 (2012)
Sambo, N., Secondini, M., Cugini, F., Bottari, G., Iovanna, P.: Modeling and distributed provisioning in 10–40-100-Gb/s multirate wavelength switched optical networks. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 29(9), 1248–1257 (2011)
Rizzelli, G., Morea, A., Tornatore, M., Rival, O.: Energy efficient traffic-aware design of on-off multi-layer translucent optical network. J. Comput. Netw. 56(10), 2443–2455 (2012)
Rival, O., Morea, A.: Resource requirements in mixed-line rate and elastic dynamic optical networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Los Angeles, USA, pp. 1–3 (2012)
Mukherjee, B.: Optical WDM Networks. Springer, New York (2010)
Heddeghem, W.V., Izdikowski, F., Vereecken, W., Colle, D., Pickavet, M., Demester, P.: Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks. Photon Netw. Commun. 24(2), 86–102 (2012)
Heddeghem, W.V., Izdikowski, F., Vereecken, W., Colle, D., Pickavet, M., Demester, P.: Equipment power consumption in optical multilayer networks. Source Data. Berlin (TKN), Germany. http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg112/Internals/idzi12Equipmentpowercons.pdf. Report Number: IBCN-12-001-01, pp. 1–28 (2012)
MRV. LambdaDriver—DWDM 40Gbps transponder (TM-40GT8). http://www.mrv.com/datasheets/LD/PDF300/MRV-LD-TM-40GT8_HI.pdf (2011)
ADVA. FSP 3000 coherent transponders. Fact sheet. http://www.advaoptical.com/_/media/Innovation/Efficient%20100G%20Transport/100G%20Coherent%20Transponder.ashx (2012)
Ciena: F10-T 10G transponder. Datasheet. http://www.ciena.com/products/f10-t/tab/features/ (2011)
Cavdar, C., Ruiz, M., Monti, P., Velasco, L., Wosinska, L.: Design of green optical networks with signal quality guarantee. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Ottawa, Canada pp. 3025–3030 (2012)
Nag, A., Tornatore, M., Mukherjee, B.: Energy-efficient and cost-efficient capacity upgrade in mixed line-rate optical networks. IEEE J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4(12), 1018–1025 (2012)
Klekamp, A., Gebhard, U., Ilchmann, F.: Energy and cost efficiency of adaptive and mixed-line-rate IP over DWDM networks. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 30(2), 215–221 (2012)
Rizzelli, G., Morea, A., Tornatore, M., Pattavina, A.: Reach-related energy consumption in IP-over-WDM 100G translucent networks. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 31(11), 1828–1834 (2013)
Chomycz, B.: Plan. Fiber Optic Netw. McGraw-Hill, New York (2009)
Iyer, S., Singh, S.P.: Impact of channel dynamics, combined nonlinearities and ASE noise on transmission performance of all optical star WDM networks. Commun. Netw. Sci. Res. 3(4), 235–249 (2011)
Ramaswami, R., Sivarajan, K.N., Sasaki, G.H.: Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2010)
Agrawal, G.P.: Fiber-optic communication systems. Wiley, London (2010)
Winzer, P.J., Essiambre, R.J.: Advanced optical modulation formats. Proc. IEEE 94(5), 952–985 (2006)
RSoft Design Group Inc., Coherent PM-QPSK versus RZ-DQPSK and DPSK for high bitrate systems. http://www.rsoftdesign.com/products.php?sub=System+and+Network&itm=OptSim&det=Application+Gallery&id=50
ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1. Spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid. Series G: Transmission Systems and Media, Digital Systems and Networks (2012)
Morea, A., Spandaro, S., Rival, O., Perello, J., Agraz, F., Verchere, D.: Power management of optoelectronic interfaces for dynamic optical networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ECOC, Geneva, Switzerland, We.8.K.3.pdf, pp. 1–3 (2011)
Civcom Devices&Systems Ltd. 100G DP-(D)QPSK coherent tunable transponder. Datasheet. DOC-11-901-00 (2014)
Fujitsu Network Communications Inc., Beyond 100G. White paper. Richardson, Texas, USA, pp. 1–5 (2012)
Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Ji, F., Zhang, L., Farahmand, F., Jue, J.P.: Energy-efficient translucent optical transport networks with mixed regenerator placement. IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol. 30(19), 3147–3156 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iyer, S., Singh, S.P. Spectral and power efficiency investigation in single- and multi-line-rate optical wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) networks. Photon Netw Commun 33, 39–51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-016-0618-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-016-0618-3