Abstract
This paper investigates factors behind co-authorships between scientists in Iran and elsewhere. It also compares the Iranian pattern of collaboration with other countries. A questionnaire was sent out to Iranian scientists in fields of physics, chemistry, and biology who had published an internationally co-authored journal article during 2003. The results show that not all co-authored articles were the result of a collaborative project. Also, the main collaborative motives behind the co-authorships were identified and described. Among these, we could mention sharing laboratory devices, accessing knowledge, and increased efficiency of the study at hand. It is clear that emigrated Iranian scientists play an important role as collaborators and probably also as links to the international scientific community as a whole. Cultural factors mix with scientific and work related ones. Although the proportion of international co-authorships is lower than in most other countries, the collaborative pattern seems rather similar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beaver, D. (2001), Reflection on scientific collaboration (and it’s study): past, present, and future, Scientometrics, 52: 365–377.
Bordon, M., Gomez, I. (2000), Collaboration networks in science. In: Cronin, B., Atkins, H. B. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in the Honor of Eugene Garfield, Information Today, pp. 197–213.
Durden, G., Perri, T. (1995), Coauthorship and publication efficiency, Atlantic Economic Journal, 23: 69–76.
Frame, J. D., Carpenter, M. P. (1979), International research collaboration, Social Studies of Science, 9: 481–497.
Georghiou, L. (1998), Global cooperation in research, Research Policy, 27: 611–626.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Double effort=Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry, Scientometrics, 50: 199–214.
Gomez, I., Fernández, M. T., Méndez, A. (1995), Collaboration patterns of Spanish scientific publications in different research areas and disciplines. In: Koening, M. E. D., Bookstein, A. (Eds), Fifth International Conference of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informatrics, Chicago, pp. 187–196.
Katz, S., Hicks, D. (1997), How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model, Scientometrics, 40: 541–554.
Katz, S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.
Kim, K. W. (2006), Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: Taking the context into consideration, Scientometrics, 66: 231–240.
Laudel, G. (2002), What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11: 3–15.
Lima, M., Liberman, S., Russell, J. M. (2005), Scientific group cohesiveness at the National University of México, Scientometrics, 64: 55–66.
Maglaughlin, K., Sonnenwald, D. H. (2005), Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. In: Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B. (Eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2005 — The 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics, Stockholm, pp. 499–508.
Management and Planning Organization (2004). IRI. Proclamation of the Vision. Document no. 101/193000 dated 10 Jan, 2004.
Mehrdad, M., Heydari, A., Sarbolouki, M. N., Etemad, S. (2004), Basic science in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Scientometrics, 61: 79–88.
Melin, G. (2000), Pragmatism and self-organization. Research collaboration on the individual level, Research Policy, 29: 31–40.
Melin, G., Persson, O. (1996), Studying research collaboration using co-authorships, Scientometrics, 36: 363–377.
Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., Rezaei, N. (2005), Scientific output in Iran at the threshold of the 21st century, Scientometrics, 62: 239–248.
Must, Ü, (2000), Cooperation of Estonian research institutions: Comparative study of co-authorship and co-partnership. In: Haveman, F., Wagner-Döbler, R., Kretschmer, H. (Eds), Proceedings of the Second Berlin Workshop on Scientometrics & Informetrics: Collaboration in Science and in Technology, September 1–3, 2000, Berlin: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung (Germany), pp. 163–171, available on-line at http://www.collnet.de/workshop/must.html
Narváez-Berthelemot, N., Russell, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., Gaillard, J. (2002), Science in Africa: An overview of mainstream scientific output, Scientometrics, 54: 229–241.
Okubo, Y., Zitt, M. (2004), Searching for research integration across Europe: A closer look at international inter-regional collaboration in France, Science and Public Policy, 31: 213–226.
Osareh, F., Wilson, S. (2000), Collaboration in Iranian scientific publications, Libri, 52: 88–98.
Pereira, T. S. (2002), International dimension of research in Portugal: the European Research Area and beyond, Science and Public Policy, 29: 451–461.
Price, D. J. de Solla (1963), Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University press, New York.
Rigby, J. (2005), Handcrafted by 16 men: the impact of single and multiple authorship in collaborative research networks, Research Evaluation, 14: 199–206.
Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1990), International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985, Scientometrics, 19: 3–10.
Thorsteinsdottir, O. H. (2000), External research collaboration in two small science systems, Scientometrics, 49: 145–160.
Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., Yoda, T. (2001), Science and Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries? RAND Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harirchi, G., Melin, G. & Etemad, S. An exploratory study of the feature of Iranian co-authorships in biology, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics 72, 11–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1693-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1693-0