Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The renewal of patents and their geographical scope for protection constitute two essential dimensions in a patent’s life, and probably the most frequently used patent value indicators. The intertwining of these dimensions (the geographical scope of protection may vary over time) makes their analysis complex, as any measure along one dimension requires an arbitrary choice on the second. This paper proposes a new indicator of patent value, the scope-year index, combining the two dimensions. The index is computed for patents filed at the EPO from 1980 to 1996 and validated in its member states. It shows that the average value of patent filings has increased in the early eighties but has constantly decreased from the mid-eighties until the mid nineties, despite the institutional expansion of the EPO. This result sheds a new and worrying light on the worldwide boom in patent filings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archontopoulos, E., D. Guellec, N. Stevnsborg, B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, N. Van Zeebroeck (2007), When small is beautiful: measuring the evolution and consequences of the voluminosity of patent applications at the EPO, Information Economics and Policy, 19(2): 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessen, J. (2006), The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics. Research On Innovation Working Paper. Available at http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patval.pdf

  • Cornelli, F., M. Schankerman (1999), Patent renewals and R&D incentives, The RAND Journal of Economics, 30(2): 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y. (2007), The effects of patent regime changes: A case study of the European Patent Office, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25: 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., D. Harhoff, B. Verspagen (2006), The Value of Patents. Presented at the EPIP Conference, Munich, September 2006.

  • Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (2000), Applications, grants and the value of patent, Economic Letters, 69(1): 109–114.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (2002), The value of patents and patenting strategies: countries and technology areas patterns, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(2): 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (2007), The European patent system at the crossroad, Chapter 8, In: Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (Eds), The Economics of the European Patent System, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 216–228.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, N. Van Zeebroeck (2007), Patent as a market instrument, Chapter 4, In: Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (Eds), The Economics of the European Patent System, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 85–113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F. Scherer, K. Vopel (1999), Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3): 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., F. Scherer, K. Vopel (2003), Citations, family size, opposition and value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32(8): 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., K. Hoisl, B. Reichl, B. Van Pottelsberghe (2007), Patent Validation at the Country Level — The Role of Fees and Translation Costs, CEPR Working Paper No. 6565.

  • Kortum, S., J. Lerner (1999), What is behind the recent surge in patenting, Research Policy, 28(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J. (1993), Patent Protection: of What Value and for How Long? NBER Working Paper, 4475: 78.

  • Lanjouw, J., A. Pakes, J. Putnam (1996), How to count patents and value intellectual property: Uses of patent renewal and application data, NBER Working Paper, 5741: 33.

  • Lanjouw, J., M. Schankerman (1997), Stylised facts of patent litigation: Value, scope and ownership, NBER Working Paper, 6297: 43.

  • Lanjouw, J. (1998), Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value, Review of Economic Studies, 65(4): 671–710.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J., M. Schankerman (1999), The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators, NBER Working Paper, 7345: 39.

  • Lemley M. (2001), Rational ignorance at the Patent Office, The Berkeley Law & Economics Working Papers, Volume 2000, 2, Article 5, FALL.

  • Pakes, A. (1986), Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European Patent Stocks, Econometrica, 54(4): 755–784.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pakes, A., M. Schankerman (1984), The rate of obsolescence of knowledge, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources, NBER Working Paper, 0346.

  • Pakes, A., M. Simpson (1989), Patent renewal data. Brookings papers on economic activity, Microeconomics, 331–401.

  • Reitzig, M. (2004), Improving patent valuations for management purposes — validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33(6–7): 939–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapsalis, E., B. Van Potteslberghe De La Potterie (2007), The institutional sources of knowledge and the value of academic patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2): 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M., A. Pakes (1986), Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period, The Economic Journal, 96(384): 1052–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M. (1998), How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field, The RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1): 77–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevnsborg, N., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (2007), Patenting procedures and filing strategies at the EPO, Chapter 6, In: Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (Eds), The Economics of the European Patent System, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 155–183.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990), A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations, The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2007), Hot ‘patent’ issues: Quantitative evidence, Chapter 7, In: Guellec, D., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (Eds), The Economics of the European Patent System, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 184–215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B., D. François (2006), The cost factor in patent systems, CEPR Discussion Paper, 5944.

  • Van Zeebroeck N., B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, D. Guellec (2006), Claiming more: the increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants, CEPR Discussion Paper, 5971.

  • Van Zeebroeck N. (2007a), The Puzzle of Patent Value Indicators, ULB, CEB Working Paper 07-023.

  • Van Zeebroeck N. (2007b), Patents Only Live Twice: A Patent Survival Analysis in Europe, ULB, CEB Working Paper 07-028.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ECARES (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium

    Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie

  2. Bruegel, Brussels, Belgium

    Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie

  3. CEPR, London, UK

    Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie

  4. Solvay Business School, Centre Emile Bernheim (CEB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), CP145/01, Av. Roosevelt 21, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie & Nicolas van Zeebroeck

Authors
  1. Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas van Zeebroeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas van Zeebroeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., van Zeebroeck, N. A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals. Scientometrics 75, 319–338 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1864-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1864-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation