Skip to main content
Log in

The mathematical relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a general framework, given a set of articles and their received citations (time periods of publication or citation are not important here) one can define the impact factor (IF) as the total number of received citations divided by the total number of publications (articles). The uncitedness factor (UF) is defined as the fraction of the articles that received no citations.

It is intuitively clear that IF should be a decreasing function of UF. This is confirmed by the results in [van Leeuwen & Moed, 2005] but all the given examples show a typical shape, seldom seen in informetrics: a horizontal S-shape (first convex then concave).

Adopting a simple model for the publication-citation relation, we prove this horizontal S-shape in this paper, showing that such a general functional relationship can be generally explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2007), Hirsch’s h-index: a stochastic model. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2005), Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, T. F., Rousseau, R. (2005), Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1): 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955), Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through the association of ideas. Science, 122: 108–111. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, 6: 468–471, 1983. ISI Press, Philadelphia, USA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2001), Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924–1996: Polymath/Information Scientist Extraordinaire. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14): 1197–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Rousseau, R., Russell, J. (2001), The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46(6): 524–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redner, S. (2005), Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review. Physics Today, 58(6): 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1997), Sitations: an exploratory study. Cybermetrics, 1(1) paper 1. http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/vlilp1.html

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F. (2005) Characteristics of journal impact factors: the effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Egghe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egghe, L. The mathematical relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor. Scientometrics 76, 117–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1902-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1902-x

Keywords

Navigation