Abstract
The long-term influence and contribution of research can be evaluated relatively reliably by bibliometric citation analysis. Previously, productivity of nations has been estimated by using either the number of published articles or journal impact factors and/or citation data. These studies show certain trends, but detailed analysis is not possible due to the assumption that all articles in a journal were equally cited. Here we describe the first comprehensive, longterm, nationwide analysis of scientific performance. We studied the lifetime research output of 748 Finnish principal investigators in biomedicine during the years 1966–2000, analysed national trends, and made a comparison with international research production. Our results indicate that analyses of the scientific contribution of persons, disciplines, or nations should be based on actual publication and citation counts rather than on derived information like impact factors. 51% of the principal investigators have published altogether 75% of the articles; however, the whole scientific community has contributed to the growth of biomedical research in Finland since the Second World War.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Autio, V.-M. (2000), Suomen Professorit Finlands Professorer, Professoriliitto — Professorsförbundet.
Boldt, J., Maleck, W., Koetter, K. P. (1999), Which countries publish in important anesthesia and critical care journals?, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 88(5): 1175–1180.
Bourke, P., Butler, L. (1997), Mapping Australia’s basic research in the medical and health sciences, The Medical Journal of Australia, 167(11–12): 610–613.
Chew, F. S. (1986), The scientific literature in diagnostic radiology for American readers: a survey and analysis of journals, papers, and authors, American Journal of Roentgenology, 147(5): 1055–1061.
de Jong, J. W., Schaper, W. (1996), The international rank order of clinical cardiology, European Heart Journal, 17(1): 35–42.
Favaloro, E. J. (1998), Medical research in New South Wales 1993–1996 assessed by Medline publication capture, The Medical Journal of Australia, 169(11–12): 617–622.
Gagnon, R. E., Macnab, A. J., Gagnon, F. A. (2000), A quantitative ranking of Canada’s research output of original human studies for the decade 1989 to 1998, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162(1): 37–40.
Garcia-Rio, F., Serrano, S., Dorgham, A., Alvarez-Sala, R., Ruiz Pena, A. & al. (2001), A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987–1998, European Respiratory Journal, 17(6): 1175–1180.
Hefler, L., Tempfer, C., Kainz, C. (1999), Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990–98, Lancet, 353(9167): 1856.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46): 16569–16572.
Husso, K., Karjalainen, S., Parkkari, T. (2000), Suomen tieteen tila ja taso. Katsaus tutkimukseen ja sen toimintaympäristöön Suomessa 1990-luvun lopulla, Suomen Akatemian julkaisuja 6, Helsinki.
Karma, P. (1995), Lääketieteellisen tutkimuksen julkinen rahoitus., Duodecim, 111(1): 73–77.
King, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations, Nature, 430(6997): 311–316.
Luukkonen, T. (1990), Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance, Annals of Medicine, 22(3): 145–150.
May, R. M. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275(5301): 793–796.
Mela, G. S., Cimmino, M. A. (1998), An overview of rheumatological research in the European Union, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 57(11): 643–647.
Mela, G. S., Cimmino, M. A., Ugolini, D. (1999), Impact assessment of oncology research in the European Union, European Journal of Cancer, 35(8): 1182–1186.
Nikkari, T. (1995), Suomen lääketieteen tutkimus bibliometrian valossa, Opetusministeriö, Korkeakouluneuvoston julkaisuja 5, Helsinki.
Opthof, T. (1997), Sense and nonsense about the impact factor, Cardiovascular Research, 33(1): 1–7.
Opthof, T., Coronel, R., Piper, H. M. (2004), Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation, Cardiovascular Research, 61(2): 201–203.
Paraje, G., Sadana, R., Karam, G. (2005), Public health. Increasing international gaps in health-related publications, Science, 308(5724): 959–960.
Persson, O., Luukkonen, T., Hälikkä, S. (2000), A Bibliometric Study of Finnish Science, VTT, Espoo.
Saxen, L. (2000), Puoli vuosisataa lääketieteen tutkimusta Suomessa., Duodecim, 116(9): 963–970.
Seglen, P. O. (1992), The skewness of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9): 628–638.
Seglen, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314(7079): 498–502.
Soteriades, E. S., Falagas, M. E. (2005), Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States, British Medical Journal, 331(7510): 192–194.
Soteriades, E. S., Rosmarakis, E. S., Paraschakis, K., Falagas, M. E. (2006), Research contribution of different world regions in the top 50 biomedical journals (1995–2002), FASEB Journal, 20(1): 29–34.
Sperti, G., Ierardi, C. (1999), The ranking of Italy’s publications in the biomedical field: an objective evaluation, Cardiologia, 44(1): 51–54.
Weeks, W. B., Wallace, A. E., Kimberly, B. C. (2004), Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals, Social Science & Medicine, 59(9): 1949–1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riikonen, P., Vihinen, M. National research contributions: A case study on Finnish biomedical research. Scientometrics 77, 207–222 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1962-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1962-y