Skip to main content
Log in

Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyse the co-authorship networks of researchers affiliated at universities in Turkey by using two databases: the international SSCI database and the Turkish ULAKBIM database. We find that co-authorship networks are composed largely of isolated groups and there is little intersection between the two databases, permitting little knowledge diffusion. There seems to be two disparate populations of researchers. While some scholars publish mostly in the international journals, others target the national audience, and there is very little intersection between the two populations. The same observation is valid for universities, among which there is very little collaboration. Our results point out that while Turkish social sciences and humanities publications have been growing impressively in the last decade, domestic networks to ensure the dissemination of knowledge and of research output are very weak and should be supported by domestic policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. E., (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities (1981–1999), Research Policy, 34: 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., Kogut, B., (1998). Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks, Management Science, 45: 905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L., (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications: The effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy 32, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. and Hicks D., (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion, Scientometrics, 59: 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., (1991). Vers des archipels de la science, Science et Technologie, 34: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003): An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 70: 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Sebastian, J., (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 44: 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioǧlu, Ö. A., Yurtsever, E., (2002). Turkey’s output in social science publications, Scientometrics, 55: 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, 44: 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabasakal, H., Bodur, M., (2006). Leadership and Culture in Turkey: A Multi-faceted Phenomenon, In: Chhokar, J., Brodbeck, F., R. House (Eds), Managerial Cultures of the World: A GLOBE Report of In-depth Studies of the Cultures of 25 Countries. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R., (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Bozeman, B., (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35: 703–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., Sivertsen, G., (1992). Understanding the patterns of international scientific collaboration, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17: 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level”, Research Policy, 29: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999, American Sociological Review, 69: 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R., (2004). Learning and knowing collectively, Ecological Economics, 49: 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte, E., Rousseau, R., (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information science, Journal of Information Science, 28: 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Melin, G., Danell, R., Kaloudis, A., (1997). Research collaboration at Nordic universities, Scientometrics, 39: 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns, Management Science, 51: 756–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solla Price, D., Beaver, D., (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 21: 1011–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H., (2007). Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies, Annual review of information Science and Technology, 41 (forthcoming).

  • Sorenson, O., Fleming, L., (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge, Research Policy, 33: 1615–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, A., (1998). A scientometric profile of social sciences research in Turkey, International Information & Library Review, 30: 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C.S., (2006). International collaboration in science and technology: Promises and pitfalls, In: Box, L., Engelhard, R., (Eds), Science and Technology Policy for Development: Dialogues at the Interface. Anthem Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L., (2005a). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1: 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L., (2005b). Network structure, self-organisation, and the growth of international collaboration in science, Research Policy, 34: 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, W. A., (1993). The collaboratory opportunity, Science, 261: 854–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., (1999). The increase in the rate of publications originating from Turkey, Scientometrics, 46: 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., Okubo, Y., (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science, Scientometrics, 47: 627–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Müge Özman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gossart, C., Özman, M. Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics 78, 323–345 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1963-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1963-x

Keywords

Navigation