Skip to main content
Log in

Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines policy-relevant effects of a yearly public ranking of individual researchers and their institutes in economics by means of their publication output in international top journals. In 1980, a grassroots ranking (‘Top 40’) of researchers in the Netherlands by means of their publications in international top journals started a competition among economists. The objective was to improve economics research in the Netherlands to an internationally competitive level. The ranking lists did stimulate output in prestigious international journals. Netherlands universities tended to perform well compared to universities elsewhere in the EU concerning volume of output in ISI source journals, but their citation impact was average. Limitations of ranking studies and of bibliometric monitoring in the field of economics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouwmans, H. (2000), Jong talent blijft buiten de top-5. Intermediair, 30: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijtendorp, T. M., Langman, M. A. (1985), De Nederlandse economen top-30. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 25 December, 1305–1307.

  • Coupé, T. (2003), Revealed performances. Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1: 1309–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Huston J., Patterson, D. M. (2001), Scholarly output of economists: A description of publishing patterns. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29: 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schuite, A. D. S. (1983), Nieuwe Nederlandse Top-40 van de Nederlandse economen. Intermediair, 19(13): 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schuite, A. D. S. (1986), Een nieuwe Nederlandse top-econoom!Intermediair, 22(52): 33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • De Schuite, A. D. S. (1987), Nieuwe Nederlandse Economen. Intermediair, 23(52): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, C., Butler, L. (2005), Testing Quantitative Indicators of the Quality and Impact of Research in the Social Sciences: A Pilot Study in Economics. REPP discussion paper 05/2.

  • Hazeu, C. (1986), Het meten van weten. Economisch Statistische Berichten, July 16, 705–707.

  • Johnes, G. (1988), Determinants of research output in economics departments in British universities. Research Policy, 17: 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T., Stengos, T. (2003), Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1: 1346–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz S. J., Palmer, J. P. (1988), Assessing assessments of the relative quality of Economics departments. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 28: 88–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33: 381–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (2006), Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1): 81–100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Van Raan, A. F. J. (1993), A bibliometric assessment of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review. Research Policy, 22: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J., Van Wijk, E. (1994), Research Performance of Netherlands’ Economics Departments in National and International Perspective. Leiden, Report CWTS.

  • Nijkamp, P. (1992), Towards performance measurement of economics research in the Netherlands. Research Evaluation, 2: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivertsen, G. (2006), A bibliometric model for performance based budgeting of research institutions. Lecture presented at the 9 th International Conference on Science & Technology Indicators, 7–9 September 2006, Leuven, Belgium.

  • Sternberg, R., Litzenberger, T. (2005), The publication and citation output of German faculties of Economics and Social Sciences-a comparison of faculties and disciplines based upon SSCI data. Scientometrics, 65: 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W., Nederhof A. J., Coupé, T., Visser, M. S., Van Wijk, E. (2002), Bibliometric Mapping of Scholarly Excellence in European Economics Research. Report to European Union, DG-RTD, Unit K-2, Brussels, Belgium. Leiden: CWTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombazos, C. G. (2005), A revisionist perspective of European research in economics. European Economic Review, 49: 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Duijnen, J. J. (1981), De Nederlandse economen top-30. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 18 November, 1143–1145.

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006), Unpublished data. Leiden: CWTS.

  • Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Spruyt, E., Nederhof, A. J. (2004), Bibliometrische studie van de Faculteit Toegepaste Economische Wetenschappen aan de Universiteit Antwerpen, 1992–2001, Leiden: CWTS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton J. Nederhof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nederhof, A.J. Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics. Scientometrics 74, 163–174 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0109-0

Keywords

Navigation