Abstract
In this paper we carry out an empirical analysis to address some questions concerning the production and quality of technology in environmental sectors. The methodology involves patents as a measure of the generation of new knowledge, and patent citations as a proxy for the quality of a technological invention. The sample contains more than 12,000 environmental European patents from firms and government institutions from 1998 to 2004. From our econometric analysis, we found that environmental patents applied by individual inventors present on average less quality that those applied by institutional inventors. The size of family patent is relevant to explain forward patent citation. Furthermore, patents coming from abroad (out of Europe), in particular with US and Japan priority, are more cited on average than local patents (with European priority). Lastly, the specialization in environmental fields of a patent plays a negative role in determining the frequency of forward citation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., McAllister, P. (1991), Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents, Research Policy, 20: 251–259.
Brunnermeier, S. B., Cohen, M. A. (2003), Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45: 278–293.
Cameron, A., Trivedi, P. (1986), Econometrics models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1: 29.
Cameron, A., Trivedi, P. (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., Wolf, P. (1981), Citation rates to technologically important patents, World Patent Information, 3: 160–163.
Gay, C., Le Bas, C. (2005), Uses without too many abuses of patent citations or the simple economics of patent citations as a measure of value and flows of knowledge, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 14: 333–338.
Gay, C., Le Bas, C., Patel, P., Touach, K. (2005), The determinants of patent citations: an empirical analysis of French and British patents in the US, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 14: 339–350.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., Vopel, K. (1999), Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions, Review of Economics & Statistics, 81: 511–515.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., Vopel, K. (2003), Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32: 1343–1363.
Jaffe, A. B., Palmer, J. (1997), Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study, Review of Economics & Statistics, 79: 610–619.
Lanjouw, J. O., Mody, A. (1996), Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy, 25: 549–571.
Lanjouw, J. O., Schankerman, M. (2004a), Protecting intellectual property rights: are small firms handicapped?, Journal of Law & Economics, 47: 45–74.
Lanjouw, J. O., Schankerman, M. (2004b), Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators, The Economic Journal, 114: 441–465.
Margolis, R. M., Kammen, D. M. (1999), Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy, Energy Policy, 27: 575–584.
Nameroff, T. J., Garant, R. J., Albert, M. B. (2004), Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents, Research Policy, 33: 959–974.
Popp, D. (2002), Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review, 92: 160–180.
Popp, D. (2006a), International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51: 46–71.
Popp, D. (2006b), They don’t invent them like they used to: an examination of energy patent citations over time, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 15: 753–776.
Putnam, J. (1996), The value of International Patent Protection, Ph D Thesis, Yale University.
Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., Frietsch, R. (2003), Linking technology areas to industrial sectors, Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research.
Thomas, P. (1999), The effect of technological impact upon patent renewal decisions, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11: 181–197.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990), A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations, Rand Journal of Economics, 21: 172–187.
Wing, I. S. (2006), Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis, Energy Economics, 28: 539–562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acosta, M., Coronado, D. & Fernández, A. Exploring the quality of environmental technology in Europe: evidence from patent citations. Scientometrics 80, 131–152 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2057-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2057-0