Skip to main content
Log in

Citations versus limitations of citations: beyond Hirsch index

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It appears popular, particularly among science administrators, to use citations and various citation measures for ranking scientists, as if such exercises would reflect the scientific potential of the persons considered. In recent time the Hirsch index h in particular has obtained visibility in this respect in view of its simplicity. We consider a possible extension of the concept of selective citations, which in fact is innate to the h index, and propose a simple generalization, indices H and Q, which to a degree supplement the information accompanying the evaluation of h. The H index keeps record of the “history” of citations and the quotient Q = H/h is a measure for the quality of a scientist based on the history of his/her citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (2005): 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Z. Deanović, Z. Supek, M. Randić, Relationship between the dose of whole-body x-irradiation and the urinary excretion of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 16 (1964): 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. J. Calabrese, Historic blunders: How toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right. Cellular & Molecular Biology, 51 (2005): 643–654.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Randić, E. Estrada, Order from chaos: Observing hormesis at the proteome level, J. Protome Res. 4 (2005) 2133–2136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. O. Hirschfelder, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 34 (1983): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Prelog, from the foreword to the book: Chemical Applications of Graph Theory (A. T. Balaban, Ed.) Academic Press, London, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Randić, Aromaticity of polycyclic conjugated hydrocarbons, Chem. Rev., 103 (2004): 3449–3605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Randić, J. Zupan, D. Vikić-Topić, D. Plavšic, A. T. Balaban, On graphical representation of proteins, Chem. Rev,. (submitted).

  9. M. Randić, On history of RandiĆ index and emerging hostility towards chemical graph theory, MATCH Commun. Math. Chem., 59 (2008): 2–124.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For application of Partial Ordering in chemistry see: M. Randić, M. Vračko, M. Novič, S. C. Basak, On ordering of folded structures, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 42 (2000): 181–231; P. R. Duchowicz, E. A. Castro, The Order Theory in QSPR-QSAR Studies, Mathematical Chemistry Monographs 7, Univ. of Kragujevac, Krgujevac, Serbia (2008).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. R. F. Muirhead, Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions on n letters, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 21, (1903): 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan Randić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randić, M. Citations versus limitations of citations: beyond Hirsch index. Scientometrics 80, 809–818 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2128-2

Keywords

Navigation