Abstract
This study aims at detecting the role of individual journals and uncovering structural patterns of information flow among scientific journals in a cross-citation network, using different bibliometric indicators and statistical methods of data analysis. Beyond measuring the individual journals’ position within the communication network, we shed light on their cognitive background as well. Language barrier and lacking internationality proved one of the main hindrances for integration into the communication network. Moreover, some document types hinder journals from establishing self-links. Against our expectations, we have found a clear divergence between strongly interlinked and high-entropy journals. Furthermore, the analysis of strong links among different fields allows the detection of high-interdisciplinary journals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. (2002), Pajek — analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing, 2265: 477–478.
Borgatti, S. P. (2002), Netdraw Network Visualization. Analytic Technologies: Harward, MA.
Burrell, Q. L. (2005), The use of the generalized Waring process in modelling informetric data. Scientometrics, 64(3): 247–270.
Glänzel, W., Telcs, A., Schubert, A. (1984), Characterization by truncated moments and its application to Pearson-type distributions. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 66: 173–183. (Correction: Probab. Th. Rel. Fields, 74 (1987) 317).
Glänzel, W. (1987), A Characterization Theorem Based on Truncated Moments and Its Application to Some Distribution Families. In: P. Bauer, F. Konecny, W. Wertz (Eds), Mathematical Statistics and Probability Vol. B, D. Reidel Publishing Company Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 75–84.
Glänzel, W. (1988), A Characterization of the Normal Distribution. Studia Sci. Math. Hungarica, 23(1–2): 89–91.
Glänzel, W. (1994), IrWin — A characterization tool for discrete distributions under Windows. In: R. Dutter, W. Grossmann (Eds), Short Communications in Computational Statistics, Proceedings of COMPSTAT’ 94, Vienna (Austria), 22–26 August 1994, pp. 199–200.
Glänzel, W., Czerwon, H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37(2): 195–221.
Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. (1999), A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management 35(1): 31–44.
Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2003), A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 56(3): 357–367.
Irwin, J. O. (1975), The generalized Waring distribution. Part I, II, III. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 138: 18–31, 204–227, 374–384.
Leydesdorff, L., Cozzens, S. E., Besselaar, P. V. D. (1994), Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings. Research Policy, 23: 217–229.
Leydesdorff, L. (2004A), Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation 60(4): 371–427.
Leydesdorff, L. (2004B), Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics 60(2): 159–180.
Leydesdorff, L. (2006), Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(5): 601–613.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007), Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303–1319.
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W. (2006), Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69(2): 409–428.
Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1993), Reference-standards for citation based assessments. Scientometrics, 26(1): 21–35.
Xekalaki, E. (1983), The univariate generalized Waring distribution in relation to accident theory — proneness, spells or contagion. Biometrics, 39(4): 887–895.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Glänzel, W. & Liang, L. Tracing the role of individual journals in a cross-citation network based on different indicators. Scientometrics 81, 821–838 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2245-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2245-y