Skip to main content
Log in

A public research institute that created and led a large industrial group in Japan

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of domestic technology transfer from the public sector (universities and public research institutes) to industry is increasing in the era of science–driven innovation. One of the purposes of a triple helix of evolving university-government–industry relations is how to make use of universities and public research institutes for industrial development. This paper first discusses the means of domestic technology transfer and points out that spinning off companies is one ultimate way to transfer technology, after discussing the relation between a triple helix and technology transfer. Then, this paper presents a unique case of a public research institute before the end of World War II in Japan. This research institute established 63 companies, such as Ricoh and Okamoto. At the same time the institute excelled in science as well. The first two Nobel Prize Laureates of Japan were researchers of this research institute. The paper discusses the management of this institute and its group companies and enabling environment surrounding the institute and its group companies at that time. At the end, the paper draws some lessons for public research institutes and their spin-off companies today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (1997) for the concept of Triple Helix.

  2. The Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) is active in spinning off companies, keeps close ties with those companies and receives financial return. In a sense, the case of CAS is similar to the case of RIKEN. However, CAS is still mainly financially supported by the government. See Kondo (2003).

  3. According to, Kondo (2007) R&D fund flow from a company to a company is ten times larger than that from a company to a university in Japan in 2005.

  4. See Schiller (2006).

  5. Comprehensive collaboration agreement is a common practice in Japan. The agreement includes various forms of collaboration such as joint R&D, contract R&D, student internship, lectures provided by company employees at a university, and lectures by faculty members at a company.

  6. Kondo (2010) lists concrete means based on the three categories.

  7. See Kondo (2002) and Shane (2004) for example.

  8. In 1908, Dr. Seiji Nakamura proposed the establishment of an Imperial Physics and Chemistry Research Institute in the newspaper. However, no concrete actions followed at this time.

  9. See Miyata (1983).

  10. See Miller and Morris (1998) for the first, second, third and fourth generation R&D management.

  11. Current RIKEN also established a good evaluation system fairly early as Gonda and Kakizaki (1995) explain.

  12. See Saito (1987, p. 353).

  13. The cases where patenting and scientific publishing are both active are found in other places. For example, see Wong and Singh (2009) and Klitkou and Gulbrandsen (2010).

  14. See Miyake (1937).

  15. The discussion on universities in Etzowitz et al. (2000) can be applicable to the case of RIKEN, a public research institute.

  16. RIKEN constructed two cyclotrons.

  17. See Ohkohchi Commemorative Foundation (1954).

  18. The sales section was reorganized as a third company but was merged with KAKEN Chemistry Company in 1982 to form KAKEN Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

  19. The Current RIKEN is also productive in research paper publication according to Hayashi and Tomizawa (2006).

  20. According a former senior manager of current RIKEN, a quarter of patent licensing revenue went to inventors at the time of old RIKEN.

  21. A similar structure is found for Munich Technical University (TU Muenchen). See Kondo (2002).

  22. The Chinese Government intentionally established pilot plant level facilities in universities and public research institutes. See Kondo (1997).

References

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldmann, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarin, B. P. (2006). Performance measures for the socio-economic impact of government spending on R&D. Scientometrics, 68(1), 41–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. London: Cassell Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonda, K., & Kakizaki, F. (1995). Research, technology and development evaluation; developments in Japan. Scientometrics, 34(3), 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, T., & Tomizawa, H. (2006). Restructuring the Japanese national research system and its effect on performance. Scientometrics, 68(2), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitkou, A., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2010). The relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishing in Norway. Scientometrics, 82(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. (1997). China: Technology policy in a transitional economy—engineering research centers to bridge research units and enterprises. Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 12(3/4), 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. (2002). Daigakuhatsu Bencha no Ikusei Senryaku (fostering strategy of university spin-offs). Tokyo: Chuo Keizai Sha (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. (2003). Chinese model to create high-tech start-ups from universities and research institutes. In M. von Zedtwitz, G. Haour, T. Khalil, & L. Lefebvre (Eds.), Management of technology: Growth through business, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. (2004). RIKEN: A research institute that led a large industrial group in JAPAN. In Proceedings of PICMET 2004 Symposium (CD-ROM), Seoul, July 31–August 4, 2004.

  • Kondo, M. (2005). Kokunaigijutuiten toshiteno Kotekikenkyukikan Supin’ohu–KyuRIKEN to RIKEN Sangyodan wo Jirei toshite (spinning off from public research institutes as domestic technology transfer–case of old RIKEN and RIKEN Industrial Group). Development Engineering, 11, 31–41 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, M. (2007). Kenkyu no Kigyoukan Renkei to Sangaku Renkei no Hikaku (in Japanese) (Comparison of research collaboration between companies and that between universities and companies). In Proceedings of 5th Annual Academic Conference of Intellectual Property Association of Japan, Tokyo (pp. 468–471) June 30–July 1, 2007.

  • Kondo, M. (2010). From collaboration to cross-over–changing university-industry relation in Japan. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 9(1/2), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. L., & Morris, L. (1998). Fourth generation R&D: Managing knowledge, technology, and innovation. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, H. (1937). Shinkou Kontzerun (new concerns), Japan concern series XI. Tokyo: Shunju-sha (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyata, S. (1983). Kagakushatachi no Jiyuna Rakuen (a free paradise for scientists). Tokyo: Bungeishunju. (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohkohchi Commemorative Foundation. (1954). Masatoshi Ohkohchi. Tokyo: Nikkan Kogyo Shimbunsha (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • RIKEN (1917). Zaidanhoujin Rikagakukenkyujo no Jigyo to Sangyoukai (RIKEN activities and industry). Tokyo (In Japanese).

  • RIKEN (1942). Kenkyu 25 nen (Twenty-five years of research). Tokyo (In Japanese).

  • RIKEN (1967). Riken 50 nen (Fifty years of RIKEN). Tokyo (In Japanese).

  • Saito, K. (1987). Shinkou Kontzerun RIKEN no Kenkyu (research on a new concern: RIKEN Industrial Group). Tokyo: Jichosha. (In Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D. (2006). The emerging role of public universities in upgrading the Thai innovation system. Presented at the 3rd ASIALICS international conference “From imitation to innovation: Asia meets global challenges”, April 16–19, 2006, Shanghai, China.

  • Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham/UK/Northampton/MA/USA: Edward Elgar Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Bureau. (2001). Report on the survey of Research and Development 2000. Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., & Singh, A. (2009). University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 83(1), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, P. Y., & Chang, Y. (2009). Academic research commercialization and knowledge production and diffusion: the moderating effects of entrepreneurial commitment. Scientometrics, 83(2), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masayuki Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, M. A public research institute that created and led a large industrial group in Japan. Scientometrics 90, 141–162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0505-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0505-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation