Skip to main content
Log in

The Journal’s Integrated Impact Index: a new indicator for journal evaluation

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Journal impact factor (JIF) has been used for journal evaluation over a long time, but also accompanied by the continuing controversy. In this study, a new indicator, the Journal’s Integrated Impact Index (JIII) has been proposed for journal evaluation. In the JIII, one journal’s average citations per paper, total citations, and all journals’ average level of average citations per paper and total citations have been used to characterize the integrated impact of journals. Some contrastive analyses were carried out between JIII and JIF. The results show some interesting properties of the new indicator, and also reveal some relevant relationships among JIII, JIF, and other bibliometric indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archanbault, E., & Lariviere, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 635–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., & Gomez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53(2), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buela-Casal, G. (2004). Assessing the quality of articles and scientific journals: Proposal for weighted impact factor and quality index. Psychology in Spain, 8(1), 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2008). Free Jouranl-ranking tool enters citation market. Nature, 451, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M. (1998). Peer review for journals as it stands today, part 1. Science Communication, 19(3), 181–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Sala, S., & Grawford, J. R. (2006). Impact factor as we know it handicaps neuropsychology and neuropasychologists. Cortex, 42(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2009). An econometric property of the g-index. Information Processing & Management, 45(4), 484–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A general framework for relative impact indicators. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27(1), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfied, E. (1955). Citation index to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfied, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometrics research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E., & Jorge, E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Rousseau, R., & Russell, J. (2001). The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46(6), 524–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren-Maestro, I., Larsen, B., & Ingwersen, P. (2009). Research assessments by synchronic and diachronic citation impact: A case study of Carlos III University of Madrid. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. 1, pp. 487-491), Rio de Janeiro.

  • Leeuwen, Van., & Moed, T. N. (2002). Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics, 53(2), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with and application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, A. M., Garcia, E. O., & Del Rio, J. A. (2000). Renormalized impact factor. Scientometrics, 47(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, M. (2010a). How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, M. (2010b). A case study of the modified g index: Counting multi-author publications fractionally. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 636–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatsompop, N., & Markpin, T. (2005). Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 676–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todeschini, R. (2011). The j-index: A new bibliometric index and multivariate comparisons between other common indices. Scientometrics, 87(3), 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkmann, G., Schlutius, S., & Schweim, H. (2002). Publication languages of impact factor journals and of medical bibliographic databanks. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 127(4), 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the editors of Scientometrics and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingcan Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, T., Wang, GF., Dong, K. et al. The Journal’s Integrated Impact Index: a new indicator for journal evaluation. Scientometrics 90, 649–658 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0538-z

Keywords

Navigation