Skip to main content
Log in

Where demographics meets scientometrics: towards a dynamic career analysis

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an earlier exercise some demographic methods were reformulated for application in a scientometric context. Age-pyramids based on annual publication output and citation impact was supplemented by the change of the mean age of the publications in the h-core at any time. Although the method was introduced to shed some demographic–scientometric light on the career of individual researchers, the second component, i.e., the age dynamics of the h-core can however be applied to higher levels of aggregation as well. However, the found paradigmatic shapes and patterns do not only characterise individual careers and positions, but are also typical of life cycles and subject-specific peculiarities. In the present study, the proposed approach is used to visualise the careers of scientists active in different fields of the sciences and social sciences and notably the second component, the h-core dynamics, is extended to the analysis of scientific journals from the same fields. In addition to the dynamics of productivity and citation impact, the evolution of co-authorship patterns of the same scientists is studied to capture another facet of individual academic careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2006). H-index for Price medalists revisited. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). A follow-up on the h-index of Price medalists. ISSI Newsletter, 22(2), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O., et al. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration, part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French elite. Scientometrics, 1, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Publication and co-operation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals. Scientometrics, 51(3), 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist, 19(22), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2007). Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1948–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10–11. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Persson, O. (2005). H-index for Price medalists. ISSI Newsletter, 1(4), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). A stochastic model for the ageing analyses of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 30(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2004). Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61(3), 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2010). A demographic look at scientometric characteristics of a scientist’s carrier. ISSI Newsletter, 6(3), 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2004). Citation review of Lagergren kinetic rate equation on adsorption reactions. Scientometrics, 59(1), 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P., Rouquier, J. B., & Croissant, Y. (2009). Testing bibliometric indicators by their prediction of scientists promotions. Scientometrics, 78(3), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B. H., Liang, L. M., Rousseau, R., et al. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(6), 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2011). International collaboration in psychology is on the rise. Scientometrics, 87(1), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H. (1994). Co-authorship networks of invisible colleges and institutional communities. Scientometrics, 30(1), 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H. (2002). Similarities and dissimilarities in coauthorship networks: Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature. Library Trends, 50(3), 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L. (2006). H-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, A., & Molinari, J. F. (2008). Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics, 75(2), 339–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. D., & Gürsey, S. (1976). Studies in scientometrics. Part 1. Transience and continuance in scientific authorship. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 1, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Where demographics meets scientometrics: Towards a dynamic career analysis. In: E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, 4–7 July 2011, pp. 914–923.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study is an extended version of a paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban (South Africa), 4–7 July 2011 (Zhang and Glänzel 2011). The first author would like to acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71103064.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Glänzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Glänzel, W. Where demographics meets scientometrics: towards a dynamic career analysis. Scientometrics 91, 617–630 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0590-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0590-8

Keywords

Navigation