Skip to main content
Log in

Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay’s dilemma with TRIF

Comments on the paper by Jerome Vanclay

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ThomsonReuters impact factor is a viable, widely used and informative measure of journal visibility and frequency of use. It is accurate, transparent and easy to use. It is a live and evolving system, that can broaden its scope and implement new features and methods. Some of Vanclay’s suggestions, like wider use of order statistics, or our suggestion of rank normalization might be implemented by JCR in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-normalized impact factor: a way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of The Asist Annual Meeting, Vol 41 (pp. 507-515). doi:10.1002/meet.1450410159.

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artifact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Garfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pudovkin, A.I., Garfield, E. Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay’s dilemma with TRIF. Scientometrics 92, 409–412 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0634-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0634-8

Keywords

Navigation