Abstract
With reference to Vanclay (Scientometrics in press, 2012) the paper argues for a pragmatic approach to the Thomson-Reuter’s journal impact factor. The paper proposes and discusses to replace the current synchronous Thomson-Reuter journal impact factor by an up-to-date diachronic version (DJIF), consisting of a three-year citation window over a one year publication window. The DJIF online data collection and calculation is exemplified and compared to the present synchronous journal impact factor. The paper discusses briefly the dimensions of currency, robustness, understandability and comparability to other impact factors used in research evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In case of synchronous TRIF for logical reasons in WoS the citation window must cover the publication years in Search mode; then the citation number from the given citation year, say 2011, can be extracted from the result table of the Citation Report.
In TRIF 2010 one year of citations are lacking (from 2009).
References
Christensen, F. H., & Ingwersen, P. (1996). Online citation analysis—A methodological approach. Scientometrics, 37(1), 39–62.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., & Wormell, I. (2000). Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In B. Cronin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: Festschrift for Eugene Garfield (pp. 373–388). Medford: Information Today.
Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Rousseau, R., & Davis, M. (2001). The publication-citation matrix and its derived quantities. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46(6), 524–528.
Moed, H. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rousseau, R. (1998). Citation distribution in pure mathematics journals. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 249–260). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Rousseau, R., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Simple arithmetic versus intuitive understanding: The case of the impact factor. ISSI Newsletter, 7(1), 10–14.
Seglen, P. O. (1995). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 1–11.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluation research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498–502.
Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ingwersen, P. The pragmatics of a diachronic journal impact factor. Scientometrics 92, 319–324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0701-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0701-1