Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to map the intellectual structure of research in doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China. By use of Co-word analysis, including cluster analysis, strategic diagram and social network analysis, we studied the internal and external structure and relationship of research fields in doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China. Data was collected, during the period of 1994–2011, from six public dissertation databases and ten degree databases provided by the universities/institutes which have been authorized to grant doctoral degrees of Library and Information Science in China. The results show that Wuhan University is the most important institution of doctoral education in LIS in China. The focuses of researches, including information resource, ontology, semantic web, semantic search, electronic government, information resource management, knowledge management, knowledge innovation, knowledge sharing, knowledge organization, network, information service, information need and digital library. The research fields of LIS doctoral dissertations in China are varied. Many of these research fields are still immature; accordingly, the well-developed and core research fields are fewer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, X. Y., & Wu, Q. Q. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133–144. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0374-1.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields. Scientometrics, 88(2), 371–383. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0408-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, M. A. (2004). From doctoral dissertation to publication: a study of 1995 American graduates in library and information sciences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 36(4), 151–157. doi:10.1177/0961000604050565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacher, J. (2002). Cluster analysis. Nuremberg: University of Erlangen—Nuremberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauin, S., Michelet, B., Schweighoffer, M. G., & Vermeulin, P. (1991). Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: understanding chemical reactions at the CNRS. Scientometrics, 22(1), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. doi:10.1214/07-aoas114.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredillet, C. N. (2009). Mapping the dynamics of the project management field: project management in action (part 2). Project Management Journal, 40(2), 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimer, L. H. (1996). Age, sex and standards of current doctoral theses by Swedish medical graduates. Scientometrics, 37(1), 171–176. doi:10.1007/bf02093493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttlar, L. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227–245. doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(99)00005-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the maps of science. Scientometrics, 49(3), 373–387. doi:10.1023/a:1010581421990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research—the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. doi:10.1007/bf02019280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1993). Historical scientometrics—mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 27(2), 119–143. doi:10.1007/bf02016546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: a study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206–1223. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1998)49:13<1206:aid-asi7>3.3.co;2-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtial, J. P., Callon, M., & Sigogneau, A. (1993). The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends. Scientometrics, 26(2), 231–242. doi:10.1007/bf02016216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (2011). Community detection: topological vs. topical. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 498–514. doi:10.1016/jjoi.2011.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2000). Incorporating the results of co-word analyses to increase search variety for information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 26(6), 429–451. doi:10.1177/016555150002600606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37(6), 817–842. doi:10.1016/s0306-4573(00)00051-0.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X. Y. (1997). Transition of library and information science education in China: problems and perspective. International Information & Library Review, 29(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenfelder, A. H. (1980). Magnetic bubble technology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, C. S., Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D. F., & Russell, T. G. (2012). LIS dissertation titles and abstracts (1930–2009): where have all the librar* gone? Library Quarterly, 82(1), 29–46. doi:10.1086/662945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. E., & Jaeger, P. T. (2007). A decade of doctorates: an examination of dissertations written by African American Women in library and information studies. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(3), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S. J., Yu, W. Z., & Luo, F. P. (2009). Citation analysis of PhD thesis at Wuhan University, China. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 33(1), 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2009.03.001.

  • Gordon, A. D. (1996). Hierarchical classification. In P. Arabie, L. J. Hubert, & G. de Soete (Eds.), Clustering and classification. River Edge: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5228–5235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herubel, J. (2007). Pre 1990 French doctoral dissertations in philosophy: a Bibliometric profile of a canonical discipline (Proceedings of ISSI 2007: 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vols I and II).

  • Jin, M. (2010). Survey research on method system of Ph.D. thesis of Library and Information Science in China. Library and Information Service (in China), 54(15), 81–85.

  • Kushkowski, J. D., Parsons, K. A., & Wiese, W. H. (2003). Master’s and doctoral thesis citations: analysis and trends of a longitudinal study. Portal-Libraries and the Academy, 3(3), 459-479, doi:10.1353/pla.2003.0062.

  • Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J. P., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change—a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3–4), 251–264. doi:10.1007/bf02020078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3–19. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. F., Ding, Y., Shuai, X., Bollen, J., Tang, J., Chen, S. S., et al. (2012). Adding community and dynamic to topic models. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 237–253. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., & Wang, H. L. (2011). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4.

  • Lurie, S. J., Fogg, T. T., & Dozier, A. M. (2009). Social network analysis as a method of assessing institutional culture: three case studies. Academic Medicine, 84(8), 1029–1035. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad16d3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, P., Evans, T., & Pearson, M. (2010). Classifying Australian PhD theses: linking research and library practices. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maimon, O., & Rokach, L. (2005). Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E. J., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953. doi:10.1002/asi.21602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, M. W., & Corley, E. A. (2009). 35 years and 160,000 articles: a bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics, 80(3), 657–682. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2099-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: a Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruteanu-Malinici, I., Ren, L., Paisley, J., Wang, E., & Carin, L. (2010). Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of topics in time-stamped documents. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(6), 996–1011. doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology—An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381–400. doi:10.1007/bf02025827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Stewart, M., Smith, P., & Barron, A. E. (2010). An investigation of distance education in North American research literature using co-word analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen-Zvi, M., Grifftihs, T., Steyvers, M., & Smyth, P (2004). The author-topic model for authors and documents. In 20th conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Banff, Canada (pp. 487–494).

  • Rzeszutek, R., Androutsos, D., & Kyan, M. (2010). Self-organizing maps for topic trend discovery. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 17(6), 607–610. doi:10.1109/lsp.2010.2048940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlater, G. A., & Thomison, D. (1974). Library science dissertations, 1925–1972: an annotated bibliography. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlater, G. A., & Thomison, D. (1982). Library science dissertations, 1973–1981: an annotated bibliography. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientic literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., & Grifth, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientic literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Looking across communicative genres: a call for inclusive indicators of interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 86(2), 449–461. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0275-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D. F., Russell, T. G., Finlay, S. C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 185–204. doi:10.1002/asi.21435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Jin, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2008). A topic modeling approach and its integration into the random walk framework for academic search. In D. Gunopulos, F. Turini, C. Zaniolo, N. Ramakrishnan, & X. D. Wu (Eds.), Icdm 2008: Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 1055–1060).

  • Turner, W. A. (1988). Packaging information for peer review: New co-word analysis techniques. In A. F. J. Van Raari (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technohgy (pp. 291–323). Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, A. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: a brief bibliometric perspective. International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 21–33. doi:10.1006/iilr.2002.0182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarroya, A., Barrios, M., Borrego, A., & Frias, A. (2008). PhD theses in Spain: a gender study covering the years 1990–2004. Scientometrics, 77(3), 469–483. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1965-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. J., Pan, Y. C., Xu, F., & Yan, B. N. (2009). The analysis of journal papers of Information Science doctors in China. Library and Information (in China), 29(2), 51–56.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. M., & Yuan, F. F. F. (1994). Library and Information education in the Peoples-Republic-of-China—the impact of Reform and Opening-Up. Education for Information, 12(2), 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, H., & Atay, E. (2007). PhD theses in Turkish sports sciences: a study covering the years 1988–2002. Scientometrics, 71(3), 415–421. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1679-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. G. (2011). Survey on research methods of Library and Information Science PhD dissertation: a case study of National Science Library. Journal of the National Library of China (in China), 20(3), 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Wu, M. Z., & Cui, L. (2012). Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 90(2), 659–673. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0541-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, S. S. (2011). Statistical analysis of Chinese doctoral dissertation of Library Science from 1994 to 2010. New Century Library (in China), 32(11), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. M., & Zhang, Q. P. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 51–87. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0428-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B., McLean, D. C., & Lu, X. H. (2006). Identifying biological concepts from a protein-related corpus with a probabilistic topic model. Bmc Bioinformatics, 7, 58. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-58.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by Jiangsu Province Graduate Students Research and Innovation Plan (CXZZ11_0059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Qian-Jin Zong, Hong-Zhou Shen, Qin-Jian Yuan, Xiao-Wei Hu & Zhi-Ping Hou

  2. School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China

    Shun-Guo Deng

Authors
  1. Qian-Jin Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong-Zhou Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qin-Jian Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-Wei Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhi-Ping Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shun-Guo Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian-Jin Zong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zong, QJ., Shen, HZ., Yuan, QJ. et al. Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics 94, 781–799 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0799-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0799-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation