Abstract
Scientific writing is about communicating ideas. Today, simplicity is more important than ever. Scientist are overwhelmed with new information. The overall growth rate for scientific publication over the last few decades has been at least 4.7 % per year, which means doubling publication volume every 15 years. I measure simplicity/readability with proportion of adjectives and adverbs in a paper, and find natural science to be the most readable and social science the least readable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bird, S. (2006). “NLTK: the natural language toolkit”. Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on interactive presentation sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 69–72.
Hopkins, D., King, G. (2007). “Extracting systematic social science meaning from text”. http://gking.harvard.edu/files/words.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2012.
Larsen, P., von Ins, M. (2010). “The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index”. Scientometrics, 84, 575–603.
Zinsser, W. (2006). On writing well: the classic guide to writing nonfiction. New York: Harper Paperbacks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. Cluttered writing: adjectives and adverbs in academia. Scientometrics 96, 679–681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0937-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0937-9