Abstract
A scientometric analysis of the Babeş-Bolyai University in Romania is provided, highlighting the strong and the weak points with respect to a range of leading international universities and referencing to some extent to nation-wide data from several countries. Taken into account are such items as total number of publications, analyses per subject area or per research field, number of citations, types of publications, Hirsch indexes, and books. Internationally, chemistry, physics, mathematics, computer science, religion, area studies, geology, paleontology, and public administration are identified as the most active areas. Nationally, a number of additional strong points are identified, such as psychology, history, and environmental sciences. The percentage of researchers with reasonably high activity (e.g., at least ~ one publication per year as indexed in major databases) is relatively low (~10 %), and the percentage with reasonably high international competitiveness (based on citation counts, number of publications, books indexed in international libraries) is at only ~2 %. The decisive factor controlling an exponential increase in publications since ~2000–2004 appears to have been a conservatively managed exponential increase of the national GDP and implicitly of the research budgets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, A. (2012a). Romanian scientists fight plagiarism. Nature, 488, 264–265.
Abbott, A. (2012b). Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister. Nature, 485, 289.
Abbott, A. (2013). Romanian science in free fall. Nature, 500, 388–389.
Ad-Astra (2012): http://www.ad-astra.ro/cartea-alba/domains_authors.php.
Aguillo, I. F., & Gutiérrez Labajos, N. (2010). Ranking Web of World Universities. Journal of International Higher Education, 3, 153–156.
ANCS (2012): National Research Report. http://cnci.ancs.ro/downloads/raport_conferinta.pdf.
Anton, A. (2005): Report on Research and directions of action. http://www.ad-astra.ro/library/papers/anton.pdf.
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 6, 336–345.
Caruntu, I. D. (2006). Romanian Universities performances and Shanghai classification. Revista Medico-Chirurgicala A Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi, 110, 257–258.
Florian, R. (2006a): Oamenii de stiinta din Romania si recunoasterea rezultatelor lor [Romanian scientists, and their recognition]. Ad Astra Journal ( www.ad-astra.ro/journal ) 5 .
Florian, R. (2006b): http://www.ad-astra.ro/docs/ghid_de_actiune.pdf.
Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48, 121–150.
Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Schubert, A., & Debackere, K. (2009). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78, 165–188.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102, 16569–16572.
ISI Thomson-Reuters ISI Web of Knowledge database, isiknowledge.com.
Luchian, T. (2009). Romanian funding cuts call for more stringent criteria. Nature, 458, 1101.
Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research. Research Policy, 12, 61–90.
Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381–422.
Must, U. (2006). “New” countries in Europe—Research, development and innovation strategies vs bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 66, 241–248.
Schiermeier, Q. (2012). Romanian prime minister accused of plagiarism. Nature, 486, 305.
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 16, 3–478.
Scopus database, www.scopus.com.
Simon, Z. (2009). Romanian expatriates face career obstacles. Science, 323, 1561.
Van Den Berghe, H., Houben, J. A., De Bruin, R. E., Moed, H. F., Kint, A., Luwel, M., et al. (1998). Bibliometric indicators of university research performance in Flanders. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science, 49, 59–67.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the science citation index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335–346.
Vinkler, P. (1998). General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 41, 185–200.
Vinkler, P. (2008). Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric indicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics, 74, 237–254.
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2011a). Towards a new crown indicator: An empirical analysis. Scientometrics, 87, 467–481.
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2011b). Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 37–47.
Acknowledgments
Profs. Sorin Filipescu, Simion Simon and Daniel David are thanked for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silaghi-Dumitrescu, R., Sabau, A. Scientometric analysis of relative performance in a key university in Romania. Scientometrics 99, 463–474 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1232-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1232-8