Skip to main content
Log in

50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (ESA)

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2014, the European Space Agency (ESA) celebrated its 50th anniversary. In this period, ESA has led European programs in space research, and has coordinated the efforts of the national industries through different, successful programs. This paper reports the conclusions of a bibliometric analysis of ESA’s scientific and technical bibliographic production. Input data covering the period from 1964 to 2014 have been collected from the Elsevier Scopus database. Using these data, a set of bibliometric indicators have been obtained to obtain knowledge on different aspects: productivity, collaboration, impact of ESA’s research on subsequent works, and information consumption patterns. The study has made use of the data analysis features provided by the Scopus database, and of two bibliometric software tools: BibExcel and VosViewer. These tools were used to complete complementary analysis (co-citation, bibliographic coupling and clustering) and generate visualizations that support the exploration of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Notes

  1. http://m.esa.int/About_Us/Welcome_to_ESA/ESA_s_Purpose. Last consulted on 29.02.2016.

  2. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus. Last visited on: 28.02.2016.

  3. http://www.scimagojr.com/help.php. Last visited on 28.02.2016.

References

  • Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Great Abington, CA: Chandos. 168 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aswathy, S., & Pal, S. (2015). A scientometric analysis of AIAA journals. In S. Thanuskodi (Ed.), Handbook of research on inventive digital tools for collection management and development in modern libraries (pp. 115–132). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

  • Bornmann, L., & Werner, M. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing, 37, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriminna, R., & Pagliaro, M. (2013). On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research. Chemistry Central Journal, 7(1), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Codina, L. (2005). Scopus: el mayor navegador científico de la web. El profesional de la información, 14(1), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulasegarah, J., & Fenton, J. E. (2010). Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267(3), 455–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Beaudry, C. (2014). Measuring collaboration mechanisms in the Canadian space sector. In Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC (Vol. 13, pp. 9237–9244).

  • Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). The h-index: A broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 681–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday (pp. 9–24). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezadad, M., & Maghami, M. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative analysis on trend of literature on flapping wing (2004–2014) by bibliometric analysis. International Review of Aerospace Engineering, 7(6), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taskn, Z., & Aydinoglu, A. U. (2015). Collaborative interdisciplinary astrobiology research: A bibliometric study of the NASA Astrobiology Institute. Scientometrics, 103, 1003–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67(3), 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Liu, M., Hong, S., & Zhuang, Y. (2013). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of GPS research from 1991–2010. Scientometrics, 95, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, X., Li, M., & Xiao, C. F. (1999). Author analysis of papers published in “Space Medicine & Medical Engineering” from 1988 to 1998. Space Medicine & Medical Engineering, 12(6), 431–435.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Eito-Brun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eito-Brun, R., Ledesma Rodríguez, M. 50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (ESA). Scientometrics 109, 551–576 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2053-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2053-8

Keywords

Navigation