Abstract
This paper looks at the patterns of collaborative scientific output during the first 10 years of the New Millennium (2000–2009) based on Web of Science data for those Mexican institutions and departments known to be researching in Chemistry. Of the 17,109 papers retrieved 76.9 % were in collaboration, with 34.3 % of these involving foreign institutions. We analysed the collaboration links with foreign partners using visualizations and their dynamics by determining the combination and frequency of individual occurrences and by establishing the sequence found in our country co-authorship chains. Bilateral partnerships were the most common predominantly with the USA and to the lesser extent with Spain. These two countries are also the protagonists of the most frequent trilateral co-authorships. Collaboration with other Latin American countries is infrequent and mainly bilateral. The number of partner countries increased from 75 to 92 from the first to the second quinquennium. With respect to the countries emerging in the second period we find a greater occurrence and repetition of bilateral partnerships and a notable presence of Mexico’s main industrialised partners in the corresponding chains. Similar numbers of journals were found for national and international collaborative papers with important differences but several coincidences. The subject range of journals was diverse in both cases, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of the field but with an important presence of titles specializing in subfields of Chemistry. Our findings provide new insight into the way countries interact and communicate when co-authoring with developing countries.
References
Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5–6), 421–433.
Appelbaum, R., Zayago Lau, E., Foladori, G., Parker, R., Villa Vazquez, L. L., Robles Belmont, E., et al. (2016). Inventory of nanotechnology companies in Mexico. Journal of Nanoparticle Research,. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3344-y.
Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: The case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755–775.
Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2014). The moderating roles of academic age and institutional sector on the relationship between co-authorship network centrality and academic research performance. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(1), 38–53.
Balaban, A. T., & Klein, D. J. (2006). Is chemistry “The Central Science”? How are different sciences related? Co-citations, reductionism, emergence, and posets. Scientometrics, 60(3), 615–637.
Bernal, J., & Juanico, A. (2011). Current status of nanotechnology in Mexico. NEHIPISIC’11 Proceeding of 10th WSEAS international conference on electronics, hardware, wireless and optical communications, and 10th WSEAS international conference on signal processing, robotics and automation, and 3rd WSEAS international conference on nanotechnology, and 2nd WSEAS international conference on plasma-fusion-nuclear physics. (pp. 54–60). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2011/Cambridge/NEHIPISIC/NEHIPISIC-07.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2016.
Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2004). Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view. Serials, 17(2), 189–195.
Bracho-Riquelme, R. L., Pescador-Salas, N., & Reyes-Romero, M. A. (1999). The change from French to English and its effect upon the impact factor and ranking of the Pasteur journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(5), 413–417.
Castaños Rodriguez, H. (2014). Inicios y evolución de la ciencia en México. In H. Castaños & E. Muñiz (Eds.), Mitos y realidades de la ciencia en México (pp 10–14). UNAM: México. http://ru.iiec.unam.mx/2655/. Accessed May 28, 2016.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Benavent-Pérez, M., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012a). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2223–2238.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Ferligoj, A., Miguel, S., Kronegger, L., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012b). Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: A case study. Scientometrics, 93(3), 699–717.
Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160–168.
Delgado Lamas, G. (2004). Editorial. Revista de la Sociedad Química de México, 48(4), 225–226.
Delgado-Ramos, G. C. (2014). Nanotechnology in Mexico: Global trends and national implications for policy and regulatory issues. Technology in Society, 37, 4–15.
Foladori, G. (2006). Nanotechnology in Latin America at the crossroads. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 3(2), 205–2016.
Gaillard, J. (1989). La science du tiers monde est-elle visible? La Recherche, 20(210), 636–640.
Gaillard, J., Gaillard, A. M., & Arvantis, R. (2013). Determining factors of international collaboration in science & technology: results of a questionnaire survey. In J. Gaillard & R. Arvanitis (Eds.), Research collaboration between Europe and Latin America: Mapping and understandig partnership (pp. 107–156). Paris: Ed. des Archives Contemporaines.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.
Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., & Sebastián, J. (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 44(3), 441–445.
Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Veloso, F., & Perez-Angón, M. A. (2016). The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0151328. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151328.
Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323–345.
Gupta, B. M. (1997). Collaboration profile of theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 39(3), 293–314.
Hennemann, S., Rybski, D., & Liefner, I. (2012). The myth of global science collaboration—Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 217–225.
Hernández-García, Y., Chamizo, J. A., Kleiche-Dray, M., & Russell, J. M. (2015). The scientific impact of Mexican steroids research 1935–1965: A bibliometric and historiographic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,. doi:10.1002/asi.23493.
Hernández-García, Y., Kleiche-Dray, M., & Russell, J. M. (2013). Enfoques metodológicos para identificar y caracterizar la investigación mexicana en Química en bases de datos bibliográficas. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 27(59), 35–66.
Huh, S. (2014). How far has the international neurology journal progressed since its transformation into an English language journal? International Neurology Journal, 18(1), 3–9.
Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89(3), 967–983.
Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ramesh Babu, B. (2011). Publication trend on nanotechnology among G15 countries: A bibliometric study. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 5(1), 61–80.
Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2013). The relationship between research performance and international collaboration in chemistry. Scientometrics, 97(3), 535–553.
Kleiche-Dray, M., & Casas-Guerrero, R. (2008). La institucionalización de un campo científico: el caso de la química en México en el siglo XX. Redes, 14(28), 47–73.
Kleiche-Dray, M., & Chiapa Zenón, A. (2014). Colaboraciones y construcción de redes de los químicos mexicanos’. In M. Kleiche-Dray & D. Villavicencio (Eds.), Cooperación y colaboración científicas y movilidad internacional en América Latina (pp. 161–176). Buenos Aires: Clacso/IRD. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/posgrados/20141028014136/cooperacion.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2016.
Kleiche-Dray, M. & Villavicencio, D. (Eds.) (2014). Cooperación y colaboración científicas y movilidad internacional en América Latina (pp. 272). Buenos Aires: Clacso/IRD. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/posgrados/20141028014136/cooperacion.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2016.
Kumari, L. (2006). Trends in synthetic organic chemistry research. Cross-country comparison of the activity index. Scientometrics, 67(3), 467–476.
Lawani, S. M. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9(1–2), 13–25.
Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C., Park, H., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El Profesional de la Información, 2(1), 87–94.
Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Vindefjä, N. A., & Sundberg, L. J. (2010). What do European research collaboration networks in life science look like? Research Evaluation, 19(5), 373–384.
Moed, H. F., & Hesselink, F. T. (1996). The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: Bibliometric analyses and policy implications. Research Policy, 25(5), 819–836.
Narváez-Berthelemot, N., Almada de Ascencio, M., & Russell, J. M. (1993). International scientific collaboration: cooperation between Latin America and Spain, as seen from different databases. Journal of Information Science, 19(5), 389–394.
Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Frigoletto, L. P., & Miquel, J. F. (1992). International scientific collaboration in Latin America. Scientometrics, 24(3), 373–392.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.
Nye, M. J. (2014). Mine, thine, and ours: Collaboration and co-authorship in the material culture of the mid-twentieth century chemical laboratory. Ambix, 61(3), 211–235.
Pankratov, A. (2005). Information resources on chemistry and natural sciences in general. Online Information Review, 29(2), 168–192.
Robles-Belmont, E., & Vinck, D. (2011). A panorama of nanoscience developments in Mexico based on the comparison and crossing of nanoscience monitoring methods. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 11(6), 5499–5507.
Rosas Gutiérrez, A. M., & Escalante Vargas, M. I. (1995). La Producción Científica Mexicana en Revistas Nacionales e lnternacionales a través de las Bases de Datos Periódica y Blat (1981–1985). Tesis de Licenciatura, Colegio de Bibliotecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF.
Rosas Poblano, S. G. (2011). El Instituto de Química y su producción científica en el periodo 2000–2009. Biblioteca Universitaria, 14(2), 56–167.
Russell, J. M., Rosas, A. M., & Escalante, M. I. (1994). Comparative study of Mexican research published in the regional and mainstream scientific literature. In 47th FID Conference and Congress. Sonic City Omiya, Saitama, Japan, 5–8 October 1994. International Federation for Information and Documentation, pp. 499–504.
Russell, J. M. (1995). The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico. Scientometrics, 34(1), 45–61.
Russell, J. M., & Ainsworth, S. (2013). Mapping S&T Collaboration between Latin America and Europe: Bibliometric Analysis of Co-authorships (1984–2007). In J. Gaillard & R. Arvantis (Eds.), Research collaborations between Europe and Latin America. Mapping and understanding partnership (pp. 43–46). Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines.
Russell, J. M., Madera-Jaramillo, M. J., Hernández-García, Y., & Ainsworth, S. (2008). Mexican collaboration networks in the international and regional arenas. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 29 July–1 August, 2008. http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/RussellWIS2008mcn.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2015.
Sangam, S. L., & Meera, (2009). Research collaboration patterns in Indian contributions to chemical sciences. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 3(1), 39–45.
Schummer, J. (1997a). Scientometric studies on chemistry I: The exponential growth of chemical substances, 1800–1995. Scientometrics, 39(1), 107–123.
Schummer, J. (1997b). Scientometric studies on chemistry II: Aims and methods of producing new chemical substances. Scientometrics, 39(1), 125–140.
StatNano. Mexican Profile. (2016). http://statnano.com/country/mexico. Accessed June 16, 2016.
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.
The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. RS Policy Document 03/11 pp.114. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2011/4294976134.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2015.
Whitesides, G. M. (2005). Nanoscience, nanotechnology, and chemistry. Small, 1(2), 172–179.
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out under the cooperation agreement “Sciences, Technology and Society” HISOQUIMEX, between the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, IRD and supported by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, UNAM; the Programa de Doctorado Transdisciplinario, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Cinvestav-IPN; and ANR géoscience.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, J.M., Hernández-García, Y. & Kleiche-Dray, M. Collaboration dynamics of Mexican research in Chemistry and its relationship with communication patterns. Scientometrics 109, 283–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2069-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2069-0