Abstract
We examine the relative strength of short-term citation counts, bibliometric measures such as journal impact factors, and journal rankings in terms of predicting long-run citations. Using a set of articles published in sixty of the highest reputation economics journals in 1994, we find that citations received over fairly short windows (between 1 and 2 years after publication) are much stronger predictors of long-run citation counts compared with journal impact factors or other journal rankings. Our results are robust to a series of robustness checks. These findings suggest department heads and tenure and promotion committees should place greater weight on short-term citations as opposed to article placement when making personnel decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2016). Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014). Scientometrics, 109(3), 2053–2065.
Adams, J. (2005). Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics, 63(3), 567–581.
Bruns, S. B., & Stern, D. I. (2016). Research assessment using early citation information. Scientometrics, 108(2), 917–935.
Engemann, K. M., & Wall, H. J. (2009). A journal ranking for the ambitious economist. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91(3), 127–139.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2011). The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 275–291.
Gibson, J., Anderson, D. L., & Tressler, J. (2014). Which journal rankings best explain academic salaries? Evidence from the University of California. Economic Inquiry, 52(4), 1322–1340.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P., & Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.
Kosteas, V. D. (2015). Journal impact factors and month of publication. Economics Letters, 135, 77–79.
Laband, D. N. (2013). On the use and abuse of economics journal rankings. The Economic Journal, 123(570), F223–F254.
Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970–1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(2), 640–666.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2011). A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact. Information Processing and Management, 47(2), 300–308.
Oswald, A. J. (2007). An Examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica, 74(293), 21–31.
Sgroi, D., & Oswald, A. J. (2013). How Should Peer-review Panels Behave? The Economic Journal, 123(570), F255–F278.
Stegehuis, C., Litvak, N., & Waltman, L. (2015). Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 642–657.
Stern, D. I. (2013). Uncertainty measures for economics journal impact factors. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 173–189.
Stern, D. I. (2014). High-ranked social science journal articles can be identified from early citation information. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112520.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Laural Ivary for her excellent research assistance and Theresa Nawalaniec for her help working with the Social Sciences Citation Index.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kosteas, V.D. Predicting long-run citation counts for articles in top economics journals. Scientometrics 115, 1395–1412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2703-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2703-0