Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Who are the international research collaboration partners for China? A novel data perspective based on NSFC grants

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International research collaboration is vital to the success of scientific development of China, and the identification of collaboration partners is the basic unit of collaboration. While many researchers have investigated international research collaboration using publication data, grant data have rarely been used. This paper explores the international research collaboration partners of China from a new data perspective, based on grant data. Using data from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) joint grants between China and 75 countries from 2006 to 2016, this study examines the collaboration partners in three aspects: overall collaboration activity, relative research effort, and collaboration groups of countries. Some interesting results are obtained as follows. Among 75 partners, the top 15 account for 95.42% of the total grants, but they are quite uneven in collaborating grant numbers and shares. The USA ranks far ahead of the others with a share of 53.27%, but China maintained a steady, approximately average collaborative effort with it from 2006 to 2016. China shows a growing preference for collaborating with Australia, the Netherlands, and Spain, while the preferences for Japan, Germany, and Sweden are the opposite. The collaborative number of grants among five collaboration groups varies greatly because of different features of constituents’ countries. The G7 and Asia–Pacific both own more than 75% of all the grants, while the BRICS and “The Belt and Road” are relatively weak in research collaboration, but China has maintained a rising trend of collaboration with them over the past 11 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://isisn.nsfc.gov.cn/egrantweb/.

  2. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal1/tab282/info24533.htm.

  3. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab511/info72211.htm.

  4. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal1/tab158/info70101.htm.

References

  • Barth, M., Haustein, S., & Scheidt, B. (2014). The life sciences in German–Chinese cooperation: An institutional-level co-publication analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujdosó, E., & Braun, T. (1983). Publication indicators of relative research efforts in physics subfields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 34(2), 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Assimakopoulos, D., Xie, H., & Chi, R. (2013). Evolution of regional scientific collaboration networks: China–Europe emerging collaborations on nano-science. International Journal of Technology Management, 63(3–4), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016). Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: An analysis of international coauthorship. Scientometrics, 109(1), 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(3), 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 96(1), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., Kumar, S., & Lal, K. (2006). Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 68(1), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 49(2), 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Zhou, P. (2011). Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 86(2), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (1987). A review of hierarchical classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 150(2), 119–137.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., & Dhawan, S. M. (2003). India’s collaboration with People’s Republic of China in science and technology: A scientometric analysis of coauthored papers during 1994–1999. Scientometrics, 57(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, S., Tunger, D., Heinrichs, G., & Baelz, G. (2011). Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: Does an Asia-Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? Scientometrics, 86(3), 727–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazir, C. S., & Autant-Bernard, C. (2014). Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: Some empirical evidence from Europe in biotechnology. Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics, 64(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2014). The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 606–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, A., & Chang, C. (2014). Beyond competition: Past, present and future on EU–China science and technology collaboration. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(3), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 102(3), 1997–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wu, D., Li, J., & Li, M. (2017). A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: Evidence from the information management literature of China. Information Processing and Management, 53(5), 1156–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., et al. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C. J. (2008). Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, F., & Qiu, J. (2014). Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1221–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. L. (2011). Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: The case study of the CSIC patents. Scientometrics, 87(3), 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., Yoon, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: The government stimulation programs of China and Korea. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1017–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2018). The f-measure for research priority. Journal of Data & Information Science, 3(1), 1–18.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R., & Yang, L. Y. (2012). Reflections on the activity index and related indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 413–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell, T., & Lata, R. (2013). Towards an integrated European research area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European framework programme data. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3), 555–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L. (2013). Does “birds of a feather flock together” matter-Evidence from a longitudinal study on US-China scientific collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China-US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Recent developments in China–US cooperation in science. Minerva, 53(3), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2016). The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Scientometrics, 106(1), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Wang, X., & Philipsen, N. J. (2017). Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states. Scientometrics, 113(2), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Liu, D., et al. (2012). The role of Chinese-American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., et al. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Li, J., Lu, X., & Li, J. (2018). Journal editorship index for assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions: An empirical analysis in the field of economics. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 448–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Li, M., Zhu, X., Song, H., & Li, J. (2015). Ranking the research productivity of business and management institutions in Asia-Pacific region: Empirical research in leading ABS journals. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1253–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Guns, R. (2014). Predicting and recommending collaborations: An author-, institution-, and country-level analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Institutional interactions: Exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1498–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. (2016). Boost basic research in China: Improving the quality, integrity and applicability of scientific research will underpin long-term economic growth. Nature, 534(7608), 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., Hao, Y., Wu, D., Li, M., & Li, J. (2017). An analysis of international research collaboration based on research project data. In: Proceedings of ISSI 2017—The 16th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 1035–1051). Wuhan University, China.

  • Zhang, C., & Guo, J. (2017). China’s international research collaboration: Evidence from a panel gravity model. Scientometrics, 113(2), 1129–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q., & Guan, J. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87(1), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Bornmann, L. (2015). An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1781–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Glänzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82(3), 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Lv, X. (2015). Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1875–1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Zhong, Y., & Yu, M. (2013). A bibliometric investigation on China–UK collaboration in food and agriculture. Scientometrics, 97(2), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge Professor Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez for her valuable suggestions to this paper when we presented it at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. The present study is an extended version of an article presented at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan (China), 16-20 October 2017 (Yuan et al. 2017). This research has been supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71425002, 71571179), the Special Fund Project of the Qinghai Province for the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements (2016-GX-109, 2016-ZJ-609, 2017-ZJ-603), the Special Fund Project on Science and Technology Innovation Strategy (ZLY201709), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-SYS036), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2012137, 2013112).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Lili Yuan, Chunbing Bao, Jianping Li & Dengsheng Wu

  2. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Lili Yuan, Chunbing Bao, Jianping Li & Dengsheng Wu

  3. Information Centre, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, China

    Yanni Hao

  4. Bureau of Planning, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, China

    Minglu Li

Authors
  1. Lili Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanni Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minglu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunbing Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dengsheng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dengsheng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, L., Hao, Y., Li, M. et al. Who are the international research collaboration partners for China? A novel data perspective based on NSFC grants. Scientometrics 116, 401–422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2753-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2753-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation