Abstract
In forestry, the Pterocarpus genus is important for the wood industry as this is a tree that is highly valued for its timber. Biotechnological research on this tree genus therefore needs to be carefully examined, even at the post-publication stage. In this paper, we examine how a near-duplicate copy of a 2004 paper published in a leading plant science and biotechnology Springer Nature journal, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, was corrected, rather than retracted. The near-duplicate paper has been cited a total of 16 times, according to the Web of Science, and since 2015, when the paper was first corrected, four citations have emerged. These additional citations for the corrected paper support our claim that the corrected paper should have been retracted, i.e., that the literature was insufficiently corrected, which may have prevented the citation of this near-duplicate paper. Readers who cited the near-duplicate paper after the erratum had been published were either unaware of the correction, or ignored it. Post-publication peer review needs to be more integrated into the publishing framework. We suggest a corrective mechanism by Clarivate Analytics to correct the journal impact factor to avoid citation inflation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) (2009) Retraction guidelines. http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf. Last Accessed 23 Mar 2018.
References
Budd, J. M., Coble, Z. C., & Anderson, K. M. (2011). Retracted publications in biomedicine: Cases for concern. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/2011/papers/retracted_publicatio.pdf. Last Accessed 21 Mar 2018.
Chand, S., & Singh, A. K. (2004a). In vitro shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of a multipurpose leguminous tree Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, 40(2), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2003488.
Chand, S., & Singh, A. K. (2004b). In vitro shoot regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of a multipurpose leguminous tree Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology—Plant, 40(5): 464–466. https://doi.org/10.1079/ivp2004548; erratum 51(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9689-6.
COPE. (2009). Retraction guidelines. https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf. Last Accessed: 21 Mar 2018.
CSE (Council of Science Editors). (2018). 2.1 Editor roles and responsibilities. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/2-1-editor-roles-and-responsibilities/. Last Accessed: 21 Mar 2018.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). (2015). Pterocarpus marsupium. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/34620/0. Last Accessed: 21 Mar 2018.
Kamoun, S., & Zipfel, C. (2016). Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct. Nature, 531, 7593. https://doi.org/10.1038/531173e.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2013). The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing. Frontiers in Plant Science 4: article 485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00485.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2014). Recent retraction cases in plant science that show why post-publication peer review is essential. Journal of Advancement in Engineering and Technology, 1(3), 4. https://doi.org/10.15297/jaet.v1i3.03.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015a). For whom the bell tolls: Downstream effects of retractions and the bump-on effects of post-publication peer review. International Journal of Plant Biology and Research, 3(4), 1050.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015b). Archives of biological sciences: From falling star to glimmer of hope. Self-published 8 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282366831.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017). COPE requires greater consistency and accountability. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2018). The illicit and illegitimate continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access black lists. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 4, 1–5.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2017). Notices and policies for retractions, expressions of concern, errata and corrigenda: Their importance, content, and context. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 521–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Kher, M. M., Soner, D., & Nataraj, M. (2018). Indian kino tree (Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.): Propagation, micropropagation, and biotechnology. Environmental and Experimental Biology, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.16.01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research for this paper was conducted in the absence of any commercial, financial or other relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Screenshots in Fig. 1 are used under the fair-use agreement.Footnote 6
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J. Citation inflation: the effect of not correcting the scientific literature sufficiently, a case study in the plant sciences. Scientometrics 116, 1213–1222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2759-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2759-x