Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research abstracts have significant functions in the process of conveying information about each research. This is much important in the scientometrics field due to the informative nature of it. The information which a research abstract provides can be of different types. That said, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the information provided by the research abstracts published in the Scientometrics journal during 1978–2017. To that end, we used a rhetorical move analysis method to analyze the research abstracts of the Scientometrics journal. In this study, 4214 research abstracts in 113 volumes of the Scientometrics journal were extracted from the original papers and reports and examined for their information based on Hyland’s (Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing, Longman London, 2000) five-move model. The results indicated that most of the information provided by the research abstracts during each decade of the journal publication and as a whole, was on method and results of the studies. Nevertheless, the least information both during each decade of the journal publication and as a whole, was on the conclusion of the studies. The results also revealed that there was a positive trajectory of development regarding information about introduction and purpose of the studies in the research abstracts. Thus, it can be concluded that there are some reasons such as situational options, community of practice, and the extent of the explicitness of the information which have effects on the information provided by the research abstracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K., & Maclean, J. (1997). A genre analysis study of 80 medical abstracts. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. (1994). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional setting. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, E. M. (2009). Differentiating, describing, and visualizing scientific space: A novel approach to the analysis of published scientific abstracts. Scientometrics, 80(2), 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, S., & Swales, J. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language science: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves on education essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doró, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesuato, S. (2009). Encoding of information in titles: Practices across four genres in linguistics. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Ecolingua: The role of e-corpora in translation and language learning (pp. 125–157). Trieste: EUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, N. (1985). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ulijn & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes: Studies and practices in native and foreign languages (pp. 123–135). London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggan, M. (2004). Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attractions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2004). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of Medical Library Association, 92(3), 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Fox, C. (2003). Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style? Scientometrics, 57(3), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

  • Ibáñez Orellana, R., Moncada Nahuelquín, F., & Santana Covarrubias, A. (2015). Organización retórica y relaciones de coherencia en el abstract de biología. Estudios filológicos, 56, 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, R., & Moncada, F. (2017). El Resumen de artículos de investigación científica. Spanish in Context, 14(2), 273–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. (1991). It is presented initially: Linear dislocation and inter-language strategies in Brazilian academic abstracts in English and Portuguese. Ilha do Desterro, 27(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. J. (2013). Making your research paper discoverable: Title plays the winning trick. IETE Technical Review, 30(5), 361–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, C. K., & Evans, M. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2814–2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorés-Sanz, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorés-Sanz, R. (2014). Lost (and gained) in translation: A contrastive (English/Spanish) analysis of rhetorical and lexicogrammatical patterns in sociology research article abstracts. In Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, 85109.

  • Marefat, H., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). Genre analysis of literature research article abstracts: Cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1–19.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V., & Mulcjenko, B. (1971). Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process. Washington, DC: Foreign Technology Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of chemical abstracts. Scientometrics, 78(2), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwogu, K. N. (1990). Discourse variation in medical texts: Schema, theme and cohesion on professional and journalistic accounts. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pho, P. D. (2009). Linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure: A corpus-based study of research article abstracts and introductions in applied linguistics and educational technology. Language and Computers, 71(1), 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M. (2006). A grounded theory on abstracts quality: Weighting variables and attributes. Scientometrics, 69(2), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porush, D. A. (1995). Short guide to writing about science. New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, N., & Ghaffarpour, H. (2012). An analysis of English and Persian academic written discourses in human sciences: An evolutionary account. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 29(3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language thesis. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotto, E., & Morgan, R. P. (1997). An exploration of expert-based text analysis techniques for assessing industrial relevance in US engineering dissertation abstracts. Scientometrics, 40(1), 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016). A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journals. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1315–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research and text type. Text, 10(4), 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M. (1996). The text organization of research papers abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zand-Moghadam, A., & Meihami, H. (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(1), 23-1.

    Google Scholar 

Research abstracts examined in the study

  • Gilbert, G. (1978). Measuring the growth of science: A review of indicators of scientific growth. Scientometrics, 1(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, Y. (1988). Internationalization of industrial research: The pharmaceutical industry; 1965–1979. Scientometrics, 13(5–6), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, M. K., Košťál, Ľ., Bilčík, B., & Winckler, C. (2017). Mapping farm animal welfare research in an enlarged Europe: International collaboration, bibliometric output, research resources and relation to economic indices. Scientometrics, 113(2), 909–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauskopf, M., & Inés Vera, M. (1997). Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile: A Scientometric approach. Scientometrics, 40(3), 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Naser Rashidi & Hussein Meihami

Authors
  1. Naser Rashidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hussein Meihami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hussein Meihami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashidi, N., Meihami, H. Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal. Scientometrics 116, 1975–1994 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2795-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2795-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation