Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative trends in research performance of the Russian universities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyzed comparative trends in research performance of the Russian institutions based on the quantitative and qualitative data available in the international SciVal, Scopus, web of science and the national Russian databases from 2012 to December 2017. Russian Federation represented 2.0% of the world population and 2% of the researchers while accounting to 2.2% of the world publications (14th place in the world scholarly output) with overall field-weighted citation impact of 0.75. Scholarly output of the Russian authors increased by 79%, field-weighted citation impact by 12% and outputs in top citation percentiles by 21% but without a statistically significant positive association between higher investment in research and development and the increase the national GDP. Scholarly output for the Russian publications in mathematics, physics and astronomy are among 5 top countries. However, field-weighted mass media impact, the number of citations per publication, citations per author and per publication, metrics of international collaboration and the academic–corporation collaboration and economic impact of the Russian research remain low. Routine analysis of the research performance and economic impact of R&D expenditure should be reflected in transparent distribution of state research funding. Legal aspects of the international research must be developed to ensure a complete integration of the Russian science into international research activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abankina, I., Aleskerov, F., Belousova, V., Gokhberg, L., Kiselgof, S., Petrushchenko, V., et al. (2016). From equality to diversity: Classifying Russian universities in a performance oriented system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103(Supplement C), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2017). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., & Magipervas, A. (2015). Features of the Advancement of Science as an Integral Part of the National Innovation System in Modern Russia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166(Supplement C), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Smart Specialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from Scandinavian regions. Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (im Druck). Google Scholar.

  • Bolotov, V., Kvelidze-Kuznetsova, N., Laptev, V., & Morozova, S. (2014). The h-Index in the Russian Science Citation Index. Educational Studies, 1, 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Zhang, Y., Zhu, G., & Mu, R. (2017). Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities? Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colledge, L., & Verlinde, R. (2014). Scival metrics guidebook. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2013). On measures of state support to the leading universities of the Russian Federation in order to increase their competitiveness among the world’s leading research and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_143479/, No. 211(March 16 (Edited on 15.11.2017)).

  • Decree of the President of the Russian Federation. (2012). On measures to implement state policy in the field of education and science. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_129346/, N 599(May 7).

  • Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation., C. o. t. S. D. o. t. b. a. t. (2017). The Project of the Federal Law No. 15455-7 “On the Federal Budget for 2017 and on the plan period 2018-2019”. December(N 15455-7), http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=PRJ;n=158072#158070.

  • Frenken, K., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekman, J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeev, I. H., & Galeeva, N. H. (2012). Experience in analyzing publication and publishing activity using Russian Index of Science citations. Educational Technologies and Society, 15(1), 594–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorin, S. V., Koroleva, A. M., & Ovcharenko, N. A. (2016). The Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) as a new trend in scientific editing and publishing in Russia. European Science Editing, 42(3), 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, V., Libkind, A., & Markusova, V. (2014). Publication activity and research cooperation between higher education institutions and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirillova, O. V., Soloshenko, NS., (2012). Comaprative analysis of the publication and citation activity between the Russian Federation and the countries of Eastern Europe. Educational Studies, (1), 148–175.

  • Kulmala, M., Lappalainen, H., Petäjä, T., Kurten, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Viisanen, Y., et al. (2015). Introduction: The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX)—Multidisciplinary, multiscale and multicomponent research and capacity-building initiative. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(22), 13085–13096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., & Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Measuring the results of science investments. Science, 331(6018), 678–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F.-.F (2017). Opening the Google AI China Center. https://www.blog.google/topics/google-asia/google-ai-china-center/, December 13.

  • Li, J., Wu, D., Li, J., & Li, M. (2017). A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: Evidence from the information management literature of China. Information Processing and Management, 53(5), 1156–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyagushkina, E., Bogatov, VV., (2017). Analysis of the effectiveness of fundamental scientific research: the publication aspect. Inter-Net Journal http://naukovedenie.ru , 9(2 (39)), https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/10EVN217.pdf.

  • Macilwain, C. (2010). What science is really worth: spending on science is one of the best ways to generate jobs and economic growth, say research advocates. But as Colin Macilwain reports, the evidence behind such claims is patchy. Nature, 465(7299), 682–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusova, V., Libkind, A., Mindeli, L., & Jansz, M. (2013). Research performance by Federal and National Research Universities and impact of competitive funding on their publication activity. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D. (2017). Vladimir Putin Says Whoever Leads in Artificial Intelligence Will Rule the World. Fortune, September 4 (http://fortune.com/2017/09/04/ai-artificial-intelligence-putin-rule-world/).

  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev, V. (2013). Tools for assessing publication activity: Ways to improve. Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy, 5(94), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’meara, S. (2015). At the very heart of progress. Nature, 528(7582), S179–S181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pislyakov, V., & Shukshina, E. (2014). Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2321–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poldin, O., Matveeva, N. N., Sterligov, I. A., & Yudkevich, M. M. (2017). Publication activity of universities: the effect of the project “5-100”. Educational Studies, 2, 10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznik-Zellen, R. (2016). Benchmarking with SciVal in Scholarly Communication and Research Services.

  • Russian Academy of Science. (2013). The concept of development of the Russian Academy of Sciences until 2025. Meetings of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=ebd03228-2fd1-4291-8af8-89f7c081547a.

  • Salter, B., Zhou, Y., Datta, S., & Salter, C. (2016). Bioinformatics and the politics of innovation in the life sciences: science and the State in the United Kingdom, China, and India. Science, Technology and Human Values, 41(5), 793–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiermeier, Q. (2010). Russia to boost university science. Nature Publishing Group.

  • Sokolov, D. V. (2014). Publication activity as a scientometric indicator: Russian and International experience. Journal of Science. Innovation. Education, 15, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tereshchenko, D., & Shcherbakov, V. S. (2017). Economic analysis of publication activity in Russia. The Economics of Education, 3, 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Directive of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2012). Plan of measures to develop and improve the competitiveness of the leading Russian universities among the world’s scientific and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=195286&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&rnd=0.925379851922461#0, October 29(No. 2006-R).

  • The Directive of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2013). Council on increasing the competitiveness of leading universities of the Russian Federation among the world’s leading scientific and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=EXP;n=613313#0, April (N 529-p).

  • The UK’s Department for Business, E. I. S. B. (2017). International comparative performance of the UK research base 2016. elsevier.com/research-intelligence.

  • Tretyakova, O., & Kabakov, E. A. (2013). Possibilities and prospects for using citation indexes in assessing the performance of a scientific institution. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 6(30), 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turko, T., Bakhturin, G., Bagan, V., Poloskov, S., & Gudym, D. (2016). Influence of the program “5–top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities. Scientometrics, 109(2), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. 5-100 Russian Academic Excellence Project. https://5top100.ru/universities/.

  • Zemlin, A. I. (2017). Legal aspects of the assessment of the performance of research organizations of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. Russian Military Journal, 1, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North-Caucasian Federal University, Pushkina street, 1, Stavropol, Russian Federation, 355009

    Anna A. Avanesova

  2. Quality Assurance, Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Elsevier, 1600 JFK Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA

    Tatyana A. Shamliyan

Authors
  1. Anna A. Avanesova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatyana A. Shamliyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatyana A. Shamliyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6 and 7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avanesova, A.A., Shamliyan, T.A. Comparative trends in research performance of the Russian universities. Scientometrics 116, 2019–2052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2807-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2807-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation