Abstract
The expanding presence of multinational research teams highlights the importance of characterizing the outcomes of international collaboration. Herein, we characterize the organization of international collaborations over four decades and report several advances which may be instructive of strategies to promote effective multinational teams. First, we uncover immutable and scale-dependent collaborative behaviors of countries governing the degree of foreign interactions and distribution of ties in multinational research. Second, we show an increased likelihood over time for countries to collaborate with nations of unequal scientific, economic, and social stature. Third, we demonstrate that temporal changes in foreign interactions result in the optimization of citation gains globally despite a lack of an association between the incidence of ties and impact in scientific relationships. These findings suggest that the assembly of multinational teams is naturally bounded and a self-organizing process. We propose that competing altruistic and egocentric citation priorities may influence partner selection resulting in modern multinational teams engendering greater absolute citation measures. Central to self-organizing systems such as market economies is the preservation of autonomy and easy diffusion of information, suggesting that enforcing these elements in science may enhance multinational teams.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. (2012). Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a.
Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a.
Barish, B. (2012). Physics: Let US physics commit to collaboration. Nature, 491(7425), 522. https://doi.org/10.1038/491522a.
Bollyky, T. J., & Bollyky, P. L. (2012). Science and government. Obama and the promotion of international science. Science, 338(6107), 610–612. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230970.
Bornmann, L. (2017). Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23728.
Campanario, J. M., & González, L. (2006). Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: Documents labeled “editorial material” in journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69(2), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0158-1.
Chessa, A., Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Penner, O., Petersen, A. M., & Riccaboni, M. (2013). European policy. Is Europe evolving toward an integrated research area? Science, 339(6120), 650–651. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227970.
Coccia, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x.
Coleman, J. H. J. (1999). What Enables Self-Organizing Behavior in Businesses. Emergence, 1(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0101_3.
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36(10), 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001.
Doria Arrieta, O. A., Pammolli, F., & Petersen, A. M. (2017). Quantifying the negative impact of brain drain on the integration of European science. Science Advances, 3(4), e1602232. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602232.
Hsiehchen, D., Espinoza, M., & Hsieh, A. (2015). Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research. Science Advances, 1(8), e1500211. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500211.
Hsiehchen, D., Espinoza, M., & Hsieh, A. (2016). Hypoallometric scaling in international collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 444, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.085.
Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357.
Ketcham, C. M., & Crawford, J. M. (2007). The impact of review articles. Laboratory Investigation, 87(12), 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700688.
Khor, K. A., & Yu, L. G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1905-6.
Krugman, P. R. (1996). The self organizing economy. New York: Wiley.
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, I., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., et al. (2009). Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research, 19(9), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.092759.109.
Lane, J., & Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Research funding. Measuring the results of science investments. Science, 331(6018), 678–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201865.
Larivière, V., Smith, M. J., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E. M., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: Journal placement and citation performance. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109195.
Macilwain, C. (2010). Science economics: What science is really worth. Nature, 465(7299), 682–684. https://doi.org/10.1038/465682a.
Ou, A. Y., Varriale, L., & Tsui, A. S. (2012). International collaboration for academic publication. Group and Organization Management, 37(4), 407–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112448422.
Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2, 902. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902.
Potts, J. (2001). Knowledge and markets. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00003865.
Press, W. H. (2013). Presidential address. What’s so special about science (and how much should we spend on it?). Science, 342(6160), 817–822.
Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806977105.
Rousseau, R., & Ding, J. (2016). Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary Journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 1009–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23565.
Schavan, A. (2008). Annette Schavan interview. German science takes an international view. Interview by Gretchen Vogel. Science, 319(5867), 1172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.319.5867.1172.
Schweitzer, F. (1997). Self-organization of complex structures: From individual to collective dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Sharp, P. A., & Leshner, A. I. (2014). Meeting global challenges. Science, 343(6171), 579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250725.
Stanley, H. E., Amaral, L. A. N., Buldyrev, S. V., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., & Salinger, M. A. (2002). Self-organized complexity in economics and finance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Supplement 1), 2561–2565. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022582899.
Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849–1857. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23515.
Teorell, J. H., Axel (2005). Determinants of democratization: Taking stock of the large-N evidence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002.
Witt, U. (1997). Self-organization and economics—What is new? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0954-349x(97)00022-2.
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsiehchen, D., Espinoza, M. & Hsieh, A. Evolution of collaboration and optimization of impact: self-organization in multinational research. Scientometrics 117, 391–407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2886-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2886-4