Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperative knowledge creation among enterprises is becoming increasingly common in uncertain environments with rapidly changing technology and increasingly complex network relationships. The objective of this paper is to better understand why and how an uncertain network environment affects an enterprise’s knowledge creation performance and knowledge creation decision-making based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork. Regarding the methodology, we proposed a dynamic knowledge supernetwork model that contains an enterprise subnetwork and a knowledge subnetwork, constructed the knowledge creation and knowledge diffusion mechanisms, and simulated the process of knowledge creation and diffusion through a multi-agent simulation. Moreover, we utilized the empirical patent data of power technology to prove the rationality and effectiveness of our model and simulation results. The results involve three main aspects. First, knowledge performance shows an exponential growth pattern. Second, in the dynamic network, we obtain a U-shaped relationship only when the effort needed to establish new cooperation is relatively small, and the inverted U-shaped relationship disappears when the above parameter exceeds a certain threshold. Third, the knowledge-based cooperation strategy is superior to the network-based cooperation strategy, and knowledge performance increases linearly and decreases exponentially with increasing network dynamics when the effort needed to establish new cooperation does not exceed and exceeds the threshold, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovsky, L., & Simpson, H. (2011). Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: Evidence from Great Britain. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(6), 949–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, C., & Subbian, K. (2014). Evolutionary network analysis: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(1), 10.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2010). Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Management Science, 56(11), 2094–2110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., Del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardenes, J., Romance, M., et al. (2014). The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports, 544(1), 1–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, T., Ganeshan, R., & Hicks, R. L. (2008). Learning and knowledge depreciation in professional services. Management Science, 54(7), 1231–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennecke, J., & Rank, O. (2017). The firm’s knowledge network and the transfer of advice among corporate inventors—A multilevel network study. Research Policy, 46(4), 768–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantner, U., & Rake, B. (2014). International research networks in pharmaceuticals: Structure and dynamics. Research Policy, 43(2), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Josserand, E., Mehra, A., & Pitsis, T. S. (2016). The transformative power of network dynamics: A research agenda. Organization Studies, 37(3), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1557–1575.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2014). Global technological collaboration network: Network analysis of international co-inventions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 358–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, X. H., & Huang, R. H. (2010). Effects of knowledge spillover on inter-organizational resource sharing decision in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3), 949–959.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, H., Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2013). Effect of collaboration network structure on knowledge creation and technological performance: The case of biotechnology in Canada. Scientometrics, 97(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E. (2013). Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile. Research Policy, 42(8), 1406–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Liu, N. (2016). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy, 45(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleboogh, A., Vizzari, G., Uhrmacher, A., & Michel, F. (2007). Modeling dynamic environments in multi-agent simulation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 14(1), 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. F. L., Snell, R. S., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2009). Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC. International Business Review, 18(6), 539–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, A. Q., Crow, M. L., Heydt, G. T., Zheng, J. P., & Dale, S. J. (2011). The future renewable electric energy delivery and management (FREEDM) system: The energy internet. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(1), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, E., Varsakelis, N., & Antoniou, I. (2018). Communication policies in knowledge networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 360–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, O. H., Simeth, M., & Seifert, R. W. (2016). Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Research Policy, 45(3), 699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2009). Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8986–8992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M., & Li, N. (2010). Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(3), 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. G., Yang, G. Y., & Hu, Z. L. (2014a). A knowledge generation model via the hypernetwork. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e89746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, Q., Tang, X., Ma, N., & Tian, R. (2014b). Superedge prediction: What opinions will be mined based on an opinion supernetwork model? Decision Support Systems, 64, 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Rafols, I., & Rousseau, R. (2012). A framework for knowledge integration and diffusion. Journal of Documentation, 68(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, S., Du, Y., Liu, P., Xuan, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015). A study on coevolutionary dynamics of knowledge diffusion and social network structure. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3619–3633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, D., Doner, R. F., & Haggard, S. (2000). From silicon valley to Singapore: Location and competitive advantage in the hard disk drive industry. Redwood City: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, K., & Rogers, M. (2004). Network density and R&D spillovers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53(2), 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, Y., & Barnett, G. A. (2011). Globalization of technology: Network analysis of global patents and trademarks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(8), 1471–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orman, G. K., Labatut, V., & Naskali, A. T. (2017). Exploring the evolution of node neighborhoods in Dynamic Networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 482, 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. M., & Woo, S. E. (2015). Untangling the networking phenomenon: A dynamic psychological perspective on how and why people network. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1477–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J., Wang, Z., & Nian, C. (2014). An approach to filling firms’ knowledge gaps based on organisational knowledge structure. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojo, R., & Gómez, I. (2006). Analysis of the Spanish scientific and technological output in the ICT sector. Scientometrics, 66(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar, S., & Kadiyala, S. S. (2006). An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 192–210.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shou, Y., & Sun, Y. (2010). Modeling and simulation of knowledge transfer within an inter-firm network. In Information science and management engineering (ISME), 2010 international conference of (Vol. 2, pp. 99–103). IEEE.

  • Sun, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Ma, H., & He, G. (2008). Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(7), 1032–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suo, Q., Sun, S., Hajli, N., & Love, P. E. (2015). User ratings analysis in social networks through a hypernetwork method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7317–7325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, F. (2011). Knowledge transfer in intra-organization networks. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(3), 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Scellato, S., Musolesi, M., Mascolo, C., & Latora, V. (2010). Small-world behavior in time-varying graphs. Physical Review E, 81(5), 055101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, R. Y., & Liu, Y. J. (2014). Isolation, insertion, and reconstruction: Three strategies to intervene in rumor spread based on supernetwork model. Decision Support Systems, 67, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, R. Y., Zhang, X. F., & Liu, Y. J. (2015). SSIC model: A multi-layer model for intervention of online rumors spreading. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 427, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todo, Y., Matous, P., & Inoue, H. (2016). The strength of long ties and the weakness of strong ties: Knowledge diffusion through supply chain networks. Research Policy, 45(9), 1890–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstoy, D. (2009). Knowledge combination and knowledge creation in a foreign-market network. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(2), 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Liu, Y., Li, J., Tang, X., & Wang, H. (2015a). Superedge coupling algorithm and its application in coupling mechanism analysis of online public opinion supernetwork. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), 2808–2823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. P., Guo, Q., Yang, G. Y., & Liu, J. G. (2015b). Improved knowledge diffusion model based on the collaboration hypernetwork. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 428, 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Yeung, J. H. Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2007). The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. In C. Boersch & R. Elschen (Eds.), Das Summa Summarum des management (pp. 61–75). Gabler.

  • Wu, J. (2011). Asymmetric roles of business ties and political ties in product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1151–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuan, Z., Xia, H., & Du, Y. (2011). Adjustment of knowledge-connection structure affects the performance of knowledge transfer. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14935–14944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. Y., Hu, Z. L., & Liu, J. G. (2015). Knowledge diffusion in the collaboration hypernetwork. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 419, 429–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamzami, N., & Schiffauerova, A. (2017). The impact of individual collaborative activities on knowledge creation and transmission. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1385–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Wu, W., & Zhao, L. (2016). A study of knowledge supernetworks and network robustness in different business incubators. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 447, 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Zhang, H., & Wu, W. (2017). Knowledge service decision making in business incubators based on the supernetwork model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 479, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 17BGL025). The authors are grateful to an anonymous referee for instructive comments that improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Liming Zhao, Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu

Authors
  1. Liming Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haihong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenqing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenqing Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Zhang, H. & Wu, W. Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork. Scientometrics 119, 657–685 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03049-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03049-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation