Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total number of publications and/or the share of total publications in a given quartile, usually first quartile (Q1), is increasingly used in performance-based funding of public research. However, the quality significance of publishing in Q1 journals is very different depending on the research areas. Both the expected probability to publish in Q1 journals, given by the number of papers published in each quartile, as well as the average citations received by Q1 publications compared to other quartiles, is largely dependent on the research area. This study analyzes the share of articles published in each quartile in the 25 largest research areas indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded (Web of Science) and their main citation characteristics aiming to enrich the discussion about journal-based evaluation systems and specifically the number and/or the share of publications in Q1. It was found that the average share of documents published in Q1 was 45.7% (38.4% for articles and reviews), varying from 25.4 to 85.6% (from 17.1 to 88.9% for articles and reviews) depending on the area. Q1 publications were cited, on average, 2.07 times more than Q2 publications (2.41 times for articles plus reviews), however, depending on the area, this ratio varied from 0.9 to 6.1 (from 1.7 to 5.4 times for articles plus reviews). Q1 (total publications or articles plus reviews), received, on average, 65% of total citations of the research area, but again this value varied from 46 to 98% depending on the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bornmann, L., de Moya Anegón, F., & Mutz, R. (2013). Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? A latent class analysis with data from the SCImago ranking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(11), 2310–2316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Williams, R. (2017). Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 788–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2019). Evaluating research and researchers by the journal impact factor: Is it better than coin flipping? Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., & Cabos, W. (2014). The effect of additional citations in the stability of Journal Citation Report categories. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1113–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Zacca-González, G., Vargas-Quesada, B., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2016). Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1239–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizee, P. K., Ghassab, R. K., Raoofi, A., & Miri, S. M. (2012). The more publication, the higher impact factor: Citation analysis of top nine gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Hepatitis Monthly, 12(12), e8467.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, J. A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & Martinez-Baena, J. (2012). On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact. Scientometrics, 90(3), 925–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., & Kumar, S. (2014). Uncitedness of Indian scientific output. Current Science, 107(6), 965–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., & Blackmore, K. L. (2017). Towards a Broader Understanding of Journal Impact: Measuring relationships between Journal Characteristics and Scholarly Impact. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(10), 2230–2235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, D. W. (2016). Positive correlation between quality and quantity in academic journals. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, A., Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2013). Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 95(2), 689–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurmis, A. P., & Kurmis, T. P. (2006). Exploring the relationship between impact factor and manuscript rejection rates in radiologic journals. Academic Radiology, 13, 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C. R., & Adams, C. A. (2015). Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Equine Veterinary Journal, 47(6), 736–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Zhong, Z., & Rousseau, R. (2015). Uncited papers, uncited authors and uncited topics: A case study in library and information science. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Guo, W., & Zuo, C. (2018). High impact factor journals have more publications than expected. Current Science, 114(5), 955–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., & Gu, M. (2016). The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1273–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, G. A., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers’ citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 2140–2145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I., & Yudkevich, M. (2019). The Russian University Excellence Initiative: Is it really excellence that is promoted? Working papers of the National Research University, Higher School of Economics. Series: Education. WP BRP 49/EDU/2019.

  • Miranda, R., & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2018). Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1015–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., Ni, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Journal acceptance rates: a cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noorden, R. (2017). The Science that’s never been cited. Nature, 552, 162–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ingeniería Química y de Materiales, Facultad de Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Ruben Miranda

  2. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Avda. Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain

    Esther Garcia-Carpintero

Authors
  1. Ruben Miranda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther Garcia-Carpintero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Miranda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miranda, R., Garcia-Carpintero, E. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics 121, 479–501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation