Abstract
A continued growth in the volume of scientific literature may strain the practice of peer review possibly leading to delays in publication. While this appears true anecdotally, exact statistics are lacking. The study goal was to quantify delays in publication in the field of orthopaedic surgery. Eight orthopedic surgery journals with available publication dates between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. Main outcomes were (1) acceptance delay (time from submission to acceptance) and (2) publication delay (time from acceptance to publication). Temporal trends for both outcomes were assessed graphically while simple linear regression was applied to assess statistical significance. 12,811 manuscripts were included that released both acceptance and publication delays. From 2010 to 2015, the median overall acceptance delay decreased from 168 (interquartile range [IQR] 115–225) to 113 (IQR 62–176) days. Similarly, there was a decrease in publication delay from 55 (IQR 26–83) days in 2010 to 16 (IQR 9–54) days in 2015; both trends p < 0.0001. Per unit increase in impact factor, there was a 19.1% (95% CI 16.1, 22.2%) increase in acceptance delay and a 15.8% (95% CI 13.5, 17.9%) decrease in publication delay. In contrast to the hypothesis, there was a decrease in delays of the peer review process in the orthopaedic surgery literature. These data are encouraging in light of the timely availability of evidence to a wide audience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
04 July 2020
In the original publication of the article, the author’s name “Shai Shemesh” was missed. The complete author group is given in this Correction.
Notes
Elsevier. “Guide for Authors.” Guide for Authors - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery–ISSN 1058-2746, www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-shoulder-and-elbow-surgery/1058-2746/guide-for-authors.
“Author Guidelines.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ®, tools.clinorthop.org/author-guidelines.
Web of Science Group, clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/scholarone/.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research Editorial Manager®, www.editorialmanager.com/corr/default.aspx.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Editorial Manager®, www.editorialmanager.com/jses/default.aspx.
References
Bagla, J., & Mishra, D. (2011). Time-lag from submission to printing in Indian biomedical journals. Indian Pediatrics, 48(1).
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329.
Chen, H., Chen, C. H., & Jhanji, V. (2013). Publication times, impact factors, and advance online publication in ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology,120(8), 1697–1701.
Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2006). Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical's publishing model. Scientometrics,69(2), 271–286.
Hartgerink C. H. (2017). Publication cycle: A study of the public Library of Science (PLOS).
Himmelstein, D. S., & Powell, K. (2016). Analysis for “the history of publishing delays” blog post v1. 0. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.45516
Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Mehlman, C. T., Heckman, J. D., & Bhandari, M. (2008). Nonscientific factors associated with acceptance for publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume, 90(11), 2432. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01687
Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Mehlman, C. T., Heckman, J. D., & Bhandari, M. (2008). Publication bias in orthopaedic research: An analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). JBJS,90(3), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00279.
Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Nwachukwu, B. U., Mehlman, C. T., Heckman, J. D., & Bhandari, M. (2012). The fate of manuscripts rejected by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). JBJS,94(17), e130. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00078.
Powell, K. (2016). The waiting game. Nature,530(7589), 148–151.
Rascati, K. L., Smith, M. J., & Neilands, T. (2001). Dealing with skewed data: an example using asthma-related costs of medicaid clients. Clinical Therapeutics,23(3), 481–498.
Rigby, J., Cox, D., & Julian, K. (2018). Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. Scientometrics,114(3), 1087–1105.
Tort, A. B., Targino, Z. H., & Amaral, O. B. (2012). Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLoS ONE,7(12), e53374.
Vosshall, L. B. (2017). The glacial pace of scientific publishing: Why it hurts everyone and what we can do to fix it.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article, the author’s name “Shai Shemesh” was missed.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charen, D.A., Maher, N.A., Zubizarreta, N. et al. Evaluation of publication delays in the orthopedic surgery manuscript review process from 2010 to 2015. Scientometrics 124, 1127–1135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03493-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03493-7