Skip to main content
Log in

Computation of exact confidence intervals from discrete data using studentized test statistics

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new area of research interest is the computation of exact confidence limits or intervals for a scalar parameter of interest θ from discrete data by inverting a hypothesis test based on a studentized test statistic. See, for example, Chan and Zhang (1999), Agresti and Min (2001) and Agresti (2003) who deal with θ a difference of binomial probabilities and Agresti and Min (2002) who deal with θ an odds ratio. However, neither (1) a detailed analysis of the computational issues involved nor (2) a reliable method of computation that deals effectively with these issues is currently available. In this paper we solve these two problems for a very broad class of discrete data models. We suppose that the distribution of the data is determined by (θ,ψ) where ψ is a nuisance parameter vector. We also consider six different studentized test statistics. Our contributions to (1) are as follows. We show that the P-value resulting from the hypothesis test, considered as a function of the null-hypothesized value of θ, has both “jump” and “drop” discontinuities. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate that these discontinuities lead to the failure of simple-minded approaches to the computation of the confidence limit or interval. We also provide a new method for efficiently computing the set of all possible locations of these discontinuities. Our contribution to (2) is to provide a new and reliable method of computing the confidence limit or interval, based on the knowledge of this set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adjuik, M., et al. 2002. Amodiaquine-artesunate versus amodiaquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in African children: A randomised, multicentre trial. The Lancet 359: 1365–1372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. 2003. Dealing with discreteness: Making ‘exact’ confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 12: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. and Min, Y. 2001. On small-sample confidence intervals for parameters in discrete distributions. Biometrics 57: 963–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. and Min, Y. 2002. Unconditional small-sample confidence intervals for the odds ratio. Biostatistics 3: 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, I.S.F. and Zhang, Z. 1999. Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions. Biometrics 55: 1202–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. and Hinkley, D.V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C.P. and Manning, G. 1990. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Statistics in Medicine 9: 1447–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabaila, P. and Lloyd, C.J. 1997. Tight upper confidence limits from discrete data. Austral. J. Statist. 37: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, O. and Nurminen, M. 1985. Comparative analysis of two rates. Statistics in Medicine 4: 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santner, T.J. and Snell, M.K. 1980. Small-sample confidence intervals for p1p2 and p1/p2 in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 386–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santner, T.J. and Duffy, D.E. 1989. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete Data. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kabaila, P. Computation of exact confidence intervals from discrete data using studentized test statistics. Stat Comput 15, 71–78 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-005-4791-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-005-4791-y

Keywords

Navigation