Skip to main content
Log in

Gricean Belief Change

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the standard principles of rationality guiding traditional accounts of belief change is the principle of minimal change: a reasoner's belief corpus should be modified in a minimal fashion when assimilating new information. This rationality principle has stood belief change in good stead. However, it does not deal properly with all belief change scenarios. We introduce a novel account of belief change motivated by one of Grice's maxims of conversational implicature: the reasoner's belief corpus is modified in a minimal fashion to assimilate exactly the new information. In this form of belief change, when the reasoner revises by new information pq their belief corpus is modified so that pq is believed but stronger propositions like p∧q are not, no matter what beliefs are in the reasoner's initial corpus. We term this conservative belief change since the revised belief corpus is a conservative extension of the original belief corpus given the new information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ALCHOURR'ON, CARLOS E., PETER GÄRDENFORS, and DAVID MAKINSON, ‘On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50:510–530, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DALAL, MUKESH, ‘Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: Preliminary report’, in Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, St. Paul, MN, 1988, pp. 449–479.

  3. GÄRDENFORS, PETER, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. GÄRDENFORS, PETER, and DAVID MAKINSON, ‘Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment’, in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspect of Reasoning About Knowledge, 1988, pp. 83–96.

  5. GRICE, HERBERT P., Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. GROVE, ADAM, ‘Two modellings for theory change’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17:157–170, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. HANSSON, SVEN OVE, A textbook of belief dynamics: Theory change and database updating, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

  8. HERZIG, ANDREAS, and OMAR RIFI, ‘Propositional belief base update and minimal change’, Artificial Intelligence, 115:107–138, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KATSUNO, HIROFUMI, and ALBERTO O. MENDELZON, ‘Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change’, Artificial Intelligence, 52:263–294, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MAKINSON, DAVID, ‘On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16:383–394, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MAKINSON, DAVID, ‘Five faces of minimality’, Studia Logica, 52:339–379, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ROTT, HANS, and MAURICE PAGNUCCO, ‘Severe with drawal (and recovery)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 28(5), 1999.

  13. ROTT, HANS, ‘Two dogmas of belief revision’, Journal of Philosophy, 97:503–522, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WINSLETT, MARIANNE, Updating Logical Databases, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Delgrande.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delgrande, J.P., Nayak, A.C. & Pagnucco, M. Gricean Belief Change. Stud Logica 79, 97–113 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-0496-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-0496-7

Keywords

Navigation