Skip to main content
Log in

All Finitely Axiomatizable Tense Logics of Linear Time Flows Are CoNP-complete

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove that all finitely axiomatizable tense logics with temporal operators for ‘always in the future’ and ‘always in the past’ and determined by linear fows time are coNP-complete. It follows, for example, that all tense logics containing a density axiom of the form ■n+1F pnF p, for some n ≥ 0, are coNP-complete. Additionally, we prove coNP-completeness of all ∩-irreducible tense logics. As these classes of tense logics contain many Kripke incomplete bimodal logics, we obtain many natural examples of Kripke incomplete normal bimodal logics which are nevertheless coNP-complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bezhanishvili, N., and I. Hodkinson, ‘All normal extensions of S5-squared are finitely axiomatizable’, Studia Logica, 78:443–457, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bezhanishvili, N., and M. Marx, ‘All proper normal extensions of S5-square have the polynomial size model property’, Studia Logica, 73:367–382, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Etessami, K., M. Vardi, and T.Wilke, ‘First-order logic with two variables and unary temporal logic’, Information and Computation, 179:279–295, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabbay, D., I. Hodkinson, and M. Reynolds, Temporal Logic: Mathematical Foundations and Computational Aspects, Volume 1, Oxford University Press, 1994.

  5. Goldblatt, R., Logics of Time and Computation, Number 7 in CSLI Lecture Notes, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1987.

  6. Litak, T., ‘On notions of completeness weaker than Kripke completeness’, in Preliminary Proceedings of International Conference on AiML, Manchester, UK, 2004.

  7. Ono, H., and A. Nakamura, ‘On the size of refutation Kripke models for some linear modal and tense logics’, Studia Logica, 39:325–333, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prior, A., Past, Present and Future, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sistla, A., and E. Clarke, ‘The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics’, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 32:733–749, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spaan, E., Complexity of Modal Logics. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Amsterdam, 1993.

  11. Wolter, F., ‘Tense logic without tense operators’, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 42:145–171, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zakharyaschev, M., and A. Alekseev, ‘All finitely axiomatizable normal extensions of K4.3 are decidable’, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 41:15–23, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zakharyaschev, M., F. Wolter, and A. Chagrov, ‘AdvancedModal Logic’, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 3, Kluwer, 2nd edition, 2001, pp. 86–266.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadeusz Litak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Litak, T., Wolter, F. All Finitely Axiomatizable Tense Logics of Linear Time Flows Are CoNP-complete. Stud Logica 81, 153–165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-3702-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-3702-8

Keywords

Navigation