Skip to main content
Log in

A quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving Hamilton path problem

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, combinatorial optimization has been widely studied. The existing optimization solutions are prone to fall into local optimal solutions and have a lower probability of obtaining global optimal solutions. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is an effective algorithm that can obtain the optimal solution with high probability. In this paper, the problem Hamiltonian is obtained by summing the problem function and the deformed constraints. Through theoretical formula derivation, the problem Hamiltonian is transformed into the Ising model. The performance of the experimental result under different optimizers and asynchronous lengths is verified on pyQPanda. The experimental results show that when using the problem Hamiltonian method set in this paper, the probability of obtaining the optimal solution is 99.59%. Compared with other methods, the proposed method can alleviate the risk of falling into local optimal solutions and obtain the global optimal solution with a higher probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gomoyunov MI, Lukoyanov NY, Plaksin AR (2020) Path-dependent Hamilton–Jacobi equations: the minimax solutions revised

  2. Mmk A, Np B, Skm A (2021) Solving traveling salesman problem using hybridization of rider optimization and spotted hyena optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 183:115353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X, Suo J, Leung S, Liu J, Zeng X (2015) The power of time-free tissue p systems: attacking np-complete problems. Neurocomputing 159(1):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yetkin M, Bilginer O (2020) On the application of nature-inspired grey wolf optimizer algorithm in geodesy. J Geodetic Sci 10(1):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wecker D, Hastings MB, Troyer M (2016) Training a quantum optimizer. Phys Rev A 94(2):022309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verdon G, Broughton M, Biamonte J (2017) A quantum algorithm to train neural networks using low-depth circuits

  7. Boukhtouta A, Ray S, Soeanu A, Pall R, Berger J (2019) Optimization of dnd multi-depot split-load pickup-delivery problem. MATEC Web Conf 296:02009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Liao W (2020) Interactively solving the takeout delivery problem based on customer satisfaction and operation cost. In: HCI International 2020—posters

  9. Ding J, Sun G (2020) Research on the optimization of the instant delivery problem within a city under the new retail environment. In: The 32nd China control and decision conference

  10. Xue G, Wang Z, Wang G (2021) Optimization of rider scheduling for a food delivery service in o2o business. J Adv Transp 2021(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farhi E, Goldstone J, Gutmann S (2014) A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Eprint Arxiv

  12. Jain A, Nandakumar K, Ross A (2013) Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Pattern Recogn 38(12):2270–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forsström MP (2020) Color representations of ising models. arXiv

  14. Breeze B, Jollymore G (2017) Understanding solicitation: beyond the binary variable of being asked or not being asked. Int J Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Market 22(4):e1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aharonov D, Dam WV, Kempe J, Landau Z, Regev O (2004) Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation. In: 45th annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science

  16. Choi J, Oh S, Kim J (2020) Quantum approximation for wireless scheduling

  17. Papageorgiou A, Petras I (2014) Estimating the ground state energy of the Schrdinger equation for convex potentials. J Complex 30(4):469–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Slater P.B. (2009) Ratios of maximal concurrence-parameterized separability functions, and generalized peres-horodecki conditions. Quantum Phys (5)

  19. Matos G, Johri S, Papi Z (2020) Quantifying the efficiency of state preparation via quantum variational eigensolvers

  20. Tao X, Wang J, Liao X (2007) An improved particle swarm optimizer with momentum. In: IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation

  21. Khan ME, Liu Z, Tangkaratt V, Gal Y (2017) Vprop: variational inference using rmsprop

  22. Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization, pp 257–269

  23. Cui GX, Dian-Kui LI (2018) Research on handwritten digit recognition based on adam optimizer self-encoding

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Research under Grant LJKZ0208, in part by the Scientific Research Foundation for Advanced Talents from Shenyang Aerospace University under Grant 18YB06, and National Basic Research Program of China under Grant JCKY2018410C004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Qi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, C., Wang, T., He, W. et al. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving Hamilton path problem. J Supercomput 78, 15381–15403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04462-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04462-y

Keywords

Navigation