Skip to main content
Log in

A logical expression of reasoning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A non-monotonic logic, the Logic of Plausible Reasoning (LPR), capable of coping with the demands of what we call complex reasoning, is introduced. It is argued that creative complex reasoning is the way of reasoning required in many instances of scientific thought, professional practice and common life decision taking. For managing the simultaneous consideration of multiple scenarios inherent in these activities, two new modalities, weak and strong plausibility, are introduced as part of the Logic of Plausible Deduction (LPD), a deductive logic specially designed to serve as the monotonic support for LPR. Axiomatics and semantics for LPD, together with a completeness proof, are provided. Once LPD has been given, LPR may be defined via a concept of extension over LPD. Although the construction of LPR extensions is first presented in standard style, for the sake of comparison with existing non-monotonic formalisms, alternative more elegant and intuitive ways for constructing non-monotonic LPR extensions are also given and proofs of their equivalence are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, J., & Machover, M. (1977). A course in mathematical logic. North-Holland.

  • Buchsbaum, A. (1995). Lógicas da Inconsistência e da Incompletude: Semântica e Axiomática. Ph.D. thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

  • Buchsbaum, A., & Béziau, J.-Y. (2004). Introduction of implication and generalization in axiomatic calculi. In: J.-Y. Béziau, A. C. Leite, & A. Facchini (Eds.), Aspects of universal logic, No. 17 in Travaux de Logique. Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques, Université de Neuchâtel, p. 231.

  • Buchsbaum A., Pequeno T. (1997). A general treatment for the deduction theorem in open calculi. Logique et Analyse 157, 9–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum, A., Pequeno, T., & Pequeno, M. (2003). Reasoning with plausible scenarios. Presented in III World Congress on Paraconsistency.

  • Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. University of Chicago Press.

  • da Costa N.C.A., Bueno O., French S. (1998). The logic of pragmatic truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 603–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Costa N.C.A., Chuaqui R., Bueno O. (1996). The logic of quasi-truth. Notas de la Sociedad de Matemática de Chile 15, 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J., & Thomas, W. (1994). Mathematical logic. Springer-Verlag.

  • Enderton, H. B. (1972). A mathematical introduction to logic. Academic Press.

  • Hanks S., McDermott D. (1987). Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection. Artificial Intelligence 33(3): 379–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel C.G. (1960). Inductive inconsistencies. Synthese 12, 439–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford Philosophical Texts, Oxford University Press.

  • Kleene S.C. (1974). Introduction to metamathematics. Wolters-Noordhoff, North Holland and American Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke S. (1959). A Completeness theorem in modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 24, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, A. T., Pequeno, M., & Pequeno, T. (1996). Well behaved IDL theories. In 13rd Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 11–20.

  • McCarthy J. (1986). Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 28(1): 89–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, E. (1979). Introduction to mathematical logic. D. Van Nostrand.

  • Pequeno T. (1990). A logic for inconsistent nonmonotonic reasoning, Technical Report 90/6, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce C. S. (1965). Collected works. Dover.

  • Pequeno, M. (1994). Defeasible logic with exceptions-first. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.

  • Pequeno, T., & Buchsbaum, A. (1991). The logic of epistemic inconsistency. In Proceedings of the second international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (pp. 453–460).

  • Pequeno, T., Buchsbaum, A., & Pequeno, M. (2001). A positive formalization for the notion of pragmatic truth. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 902–908).

  • Popper, K. R. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, revised edition, first published in 1959.

  • Reiter R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J. R. (1967). Mathematical logic. Addison-Wesley.

  • Suppes, P. (1969). Studies in the methodology and foundations of science: Selected papers from 1951 to 1969. Addison-Wesley.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1942). The blue and brown books. Harper Perennial.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Buchsbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchsbaum, A., Pequeno, T. & Pequeno, M. A logical expression of reasoning. Synthese 154, 431–466 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9128-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9128-7

Keywords

Navigation