Abstract
The texts (and talk) of engineers take different forms. In this essay, I present and critique several texts written for different purposes and audiences but all intended to convey to the reader the technical details of whatever they are about—whether a textbook passage describing the fundamental behavior of an electrical component, a journal article about a mathematical technique intended for use in design optimization, a memo to co-workers within a firm about a heat transfer analysis of a remotely sited building, or a general introduction to the field of? ergonomics? My aim is to explore how the ways in which engineers describe and document their problems and projects frame what they accept, display and profess as useful knowledge. In this I am particularly interested in how engineers envision the ‘users’ of, or participants in, their productions. Like science, engineering texts are written as if they were timeless and untainted by socio-cultural features. However, a technical treatise is not devoid of metaphor or creative rendering of events; there is always a narrative within which worldly data and instrumental logic is embedded—but it is a story in which the passive voice prevails, history is irrelevant, and the human actor or agent is painted in quantitative parameters fitting the occasion. Whether this rhetoric can be sustained in the face of challenges to traditional ways of doing engineering is an open question.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearn A.L. (2000) Words fail us: The pragmatic need for rhetoric in engineering communication. Global Journal of Engineering Education 4(1): 57–63
Beer F.P., Johnston E.R.Jr., DeWolf J.T. (2006) Mechanics of Materials (4th ed). McGraw-Hill, New York
Bucciarelli L.L. (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Bucciarelli L.L. (2002) Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies 23(3): 219–213
Goodman N. (1983) Fact fiction and forecast (4th ed). Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Habermas J. (1984/1987) The theory of communicative action (vols. 1/2). Beacon Press, Boston
Korngold J.C., Gabriele G.A. (1997) Journal of Mechanical Design 119(4): 427–433
MIT, Engineering Council for Undergraduate Education (2005). From useful abstractions to useful designs—thoughts on the foundations of the engineering method, PART II, a subject to satisfy a GIR in the engineering method—educational and pedagogical goals and sample curriculum Draft.
McCloskey D.N. (1998) The rhetoric of economics (2nd ed). University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Peacock B. (2002) Measurement in manufacturing ergonomics. In: Charlton S.G., O’Brien T.G. (eds) Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey
Putnam, H. (1994). In J. Conant (Ed.), Words and life. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Robinson J.A. (1998) Engineering thinking and rhetoric. Journal of Engineering Education 87(8): 227–229
Senturia S.D., Wedlock B.D. (1975) Electronic circuits and applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Sobieski J.S., Tulinius J. (1991) MDO can help resolve the designer’s dilemma. Aerospace America 29: 32–35
Tappeta R.V., Renaud L.E. (1997) Multiobjective colloborative optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design 119: 403–411
Wilcox A.D. et al (1990) Engineering design for electrical engineers. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bucciarelli, L.L. The epistemic implications of engineering rhetoric. Synthese 168, 333–356 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9454-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9454-z