Skip to main content
Log in

Diagrammatic reasoning in Frege’s Begriffsschrift

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Part III of his 1879 logic Frege proves a theorem in the theory of sequences on the basis of four definitions. He claims in Grundlagen that this proof, despite being strictly deductive, constitutes a real extension of our knowledge, that it is ampliative rather than merely explicative. Frege furthermore connects this idea of ampliative deductive proof to what he thinks of as a fruitful definition, one that draws new lines. My aim is to show that we can make good sense of these claims if we read Frege’s notation diagrammatically, in particular, if we take that notation to have been designed to enable one to exhibit the (inferentially articulated) contents of concepts in a way that allows one to reason deductively on the basis of those contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dummett M. (1972) Frege: Philosophy of language. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879). Conceptual notation, a formula language of pure thought modelled upon the formula language of arithmetic. In Conceptual notation and related articles (T. W. Bynum, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.

  • Frege, G. (1880/1881). Boole’s logical calculus and the concept-script. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Posthumous writings (P. Long & R. White, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979.

  • Frege, G. (1882a). On the scientific justification of a conceptual notation. In Conceptual notation and related articles (T. W. Bynum, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.

  • Frege, G. (1882b). On the aim of the ‘conceptual notation’. In Conceptual notation and related articles. (T. W. Bynum, Trans. and Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.

  • Frege, G. (1884). Foundations of arithmetic (J. L. Austin, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1980.

  • Frege, G. (1892). On sense and meaning. In B. McGuinness (Ed.), Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy (M. Black, V. H. Dudman, P. Geach, H. Kaal, E.-H. W. Kluge, B. McGuinness, & R. H. Stoothoff, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1984.

  • Frege, G. (1906). On the foundations of geometry: Second series. In B. McGuinness (Ed.), Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy (M. Black, V. H. Dudman, P. Geach, H. Kaal, E.-H. W. Kluge, B. McGuinness, & R. H. Stoothoff, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1984.

  • Frege, G. (1914). Logic in mathematics. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Posthumous writings (P. Long & R. White, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979.

  • Frege, G. (1919). Notes for Ludwig Darmstaedter. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Posthumous writings (P. Long & R. White, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979.

  • Laugwitz, D. (1999). Bernhard Riemann 1826–1866: Turning points in the conception of mathematics (A. Shenitzer, Trans.). Boston: Birkhäuser.

  • Macbeth D. (2004) Viète, Descartes, and the emergence of modern mathematics. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25: 87–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth D. (2005). Frege’s logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  • Macbeth, D. (2010). Diagrammatic reasoning in Euclid’s Elements. In B. Van Kerkhove, J. De Vuyst, & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on mathematical practice, texts in philosophy (Vol. 12). London: College Publications.

  • Macbeth, D. (2011). Seeing how it goes: Paper-and-pencil reasoning in mathematical practice. Philosophia Mathematica. doi:10.1093/philmat/nkr006.

  • Shin S.-J. (1997) Kant’s syntheticity revisited by Pierce. Synthese 113: 1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein H. (1988) Logos, logic, and Logistiké: Some philosophical remarks on nineteenth-century transformations of mathematics. In: Aspray W., Kitcher P. (eds) History and philosophy of modern mathematics. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden J. (1995) Extending knowledge and ‘fruitful concepts’: Fregean themes in the foundations of mathematics. Noûs 29: 427–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden J. (2006) The Riemannian background to Frege’s philosophy. In: Ferreirós J., Gray J. J. (eds) The architecture of modern mathematics: Essays in history and philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Macbeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macbeth, D. Diagrammatic reasoning in Frege’s Begriffsschrift . Synthese 186, 289–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0068-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0068-0

Keywords

Navigation