Abstract
The notion of empirical adequacy has received recent philosophical attention, especially within the framework of the semantic approach. Empirical adequacy, as explicated in the semantic approach, concerns the relationship between empirical substructures and some phenomena. The aim here is to differentiate this notion of empirical adequacy from one concerning the relationship between data and phenomena. Distinguishing each notion of empirical adequacy emphasizes different aspects of scientific practice—one concerning theory-development from the basis of an established theory, the other concerning theory-development from the basis of data-fitting, where established theory may not foster further development. To illustrate this contrast, an example from financial economics is considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogen J. (2011) ‘Saving the phenomena’ and saving the phenomena. Synthese 182: 7–22
Bogen J., Woodward J. (1988) Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review 97: 303–352
Bueno O. (1997) Empirical adequacy: A partial structures approach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: 585–610
Bueno O. (1999) What is structural empiricism? Scientific change in an empiricist setting. Erkenntnis 50: 59–85
Bueno O., French S., Ladyman J. (2002) On representing the relationship between the mathematical and the empirical. Philosophy of Science 69: 497–518
Da Costa N. C. A., French S. (1989) Pragmatic truth and the logic of induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40: 333–356
Da Costa N. C. A., French S. (1990) The model-theoretic approach in the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science 57: 248–265
Dukich J. M., Hawkins D. M. (2010) Identifying shifts in spread using the cauchy cusum: An application to the Japanese Yen/US dollar exchange rate. Applied Financial Economics 20: 417–424
Eriksson K. (2004) Statistical and combinatorial aspects of comparative genomics. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 31: 203–216
Fama E. F. (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 25: 383–417
Glymour B. (2000) Data and phenomena: A distinction reconsidered. Erkenntnis 52: 29–37
Hacking I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hsu D.-A., Miller R. B., Wichern D. W. (1974) On the stable Paretian behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 108–113
Hudson R. L., Mandelbrot B. (2004) The (mis)behavior of markets: A fractal view of risk, ruin and reward. Basic Books, New York
Hull J. C. (2008) Fundamentals of future and options markets. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Kahnman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–291
Mandelbrot B. (1967) The variation of some other speculative prices. The Journal of Business 40: 393–414
Mantegna R. N., Stanley H. E. (1995) Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index. Nature 376: 46–49
Mantegna R. N., Stanley H. E. (2000) An introduction to econophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mikenberg I., Da Costa N. C. A., Chuaqui R. (1986) Pragmatic truth and approximation to truth. Journal of Symbolic Logic 51: 201–221
Norton J. (2003) A material theory of induction. Philosophy of Science 70: 647–670
Peters E. (1994) Fractal market analysis: Applying chaos theory to investment and economics. Wiley, New York
Putnam H. (1979) Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Suarez, M. (1995). How theories save phenomena: A case against “embedding”. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics.
Suppes, P. (1962). Models of data. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, & A. Tarski (Eds.), Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 international congress. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Voit J. (2001) The statistical mechanics of financial markets. Springer, Berlin
Woodward J. (1989) Data and phenomena. Synthese 79: 393–472
Woodward J. (2011) Data and phenomena: A restatement and defense. Synthese 182: 165–179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dukich, J.M. Two types of empirical adequacy: a partial structures approach. Synthese 190, 2801–2820 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0085-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0085-z