Abstract
Our aim is to propose several itineraries which follow the scenario having as a first step Euclid’s Fifth Postulate; as a second step the Bolyai–Lobachevsky’s non-Euclidean geometries and as a third step Einstein’s relativity theory. The role of Euclid’s fifth postulate is successively assumed by Archimedes’ axiom; Zermelo’s choice axiom; Cantor’s continuum hypothesis; von Neumann’s foundation axiom for set theory; Church–Turing thesis and Turing’s computability; the validity of classical logic under the form of the principles of identity, non-contradiction and excluded middle; the macroscopic universe assumed as form of existence, including the fact that humans are macroscopic beings; human language and semiosis assumed as the unique way to approach understanding and communication; the old Greek ideal of order, symmetry and harmony, adopted for representation of the world in Art and Poetry. The common denominator of these starting steps is the fact that they all correspond to the sensorial-empirical perception of the world. We point out the strong interaction among the steps corresponding, in these different itineraries, to Einstein’s relativity theory. We infer in this way the need of a transdisciplinary approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aczel, P. (1988). Non-well-founded sets, CSLI Lecture Notes 14, Stanford.
Brown, D. J., & Robinson, A. (1975). Non-standard exchange economies. Econometrica, 41(1), 41–60.
Chen, J. C. H. (2002). Quantum computation and natural language. Hamburg.
Debreu, G. (1974). Four aspects of the mathematical theory of economic equilibrium. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (pp. 65–77). Vancouver.
de Beaugrande, R. (1988). Quantum aspects of artistic perception. Poetics, 17, 305–332.
Eggington, W. (2013). On Borges, particles and the paradox of the perceived, The Stone. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com.
Favrholdt, D. (1993). Niels Bohr’s views concerning language. Semiotica, 94, 5–34.
Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Stolz, O. (1885). Vorlesungenüber Allgemeine Arithmetik. Leipzig: Teubner.
Suppes, P. (1977). Is visual space Euclidean? Erkenntnis, 36, 307–421.
Woodin, H. W. (1999). The axiom of determinacy, forcing axioms and the non-stationary ideal. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marcus, S. Starting from the scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein. Synthese 192, 2139–2149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0346-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0346-5