Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents comparative results on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6. The two mobility support protocols have similar hierarchical mobility management architectures but there are, however, clearly different perceptions: Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 has specific properties of a host-based mobility support protocol, whereas Proxy Mobile IPv6 is based on a network-based mobility support protocol. Thus, it is important to reveal their mobility characteristics and performance impact factors. In this paper, a cost based evaluation model is developed that evaluates the location update cost, the packet delivery cost, and the wireless power consumption cost based on the protocol operations used. Then, the numerical results are presented in where impacts of the various system parameters are evaluated. The results demonstrate that Proxy Mobile IPv6 always outperforms Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 due to its ability to avoid the mobility signaling sent by the mobile host, and its reduced tunneling overhead during communications with other nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, D., Perkins, C., & Arkko, J. (2004). Mobility support in IPv6. RFC 3775, June 2004.

  2. Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., ElMalki, K., & Bellier, L. (2008). Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) mobility management. RFC 5380, October 2008.

  3. Lee, J.-H., Lee, J.-H., & Chung, T.-M. (2007). An adaptive inter-mobility supports scheme for NetLMM. In Proceedings of second international conference on systems and networks communications (ICSNC) 2007, p. 10, August 2007.

  4. Lee, J.-H., Kim, Y.-D., & Chung, T.-M. (2008). An investigation of distance-based proxy mobile client selection schemes for NetLMM. In Proceedings of 22nd international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA) 2008, pp. 1557–1560, March 2008.

  5. Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., & Patil, B. (2008). Proxy Mobile IPv6. RFC 5213, August 2008.

  6. Kempf, J. (Ed.) (2007). Problem statement for network-based localized mobility management (NETLMM). RFC 4830, April 2007.

  7. Kempf, J. (Ed.) (2007). Goals for network-based localized mobility management (NETLMM). RFC 4831, April 2007.

  8. Lee, J.-H., Han, Y.-J., Lim, H.-J., & Chung, T.-M. (2005). New binding update method using GDMHA in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6. In LNCS: Vol. 3480. Proceedings of international conference on computational science and its applications (ICCSA) 2005, pp. 146–155, May 2005.

  9. Pack, S., Shen, X., Mark, J.W., & Pan, J. (2007). Adaptive route optimization in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(8), 903–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pack, S., Kwon, T., & Choi, Y. (2007). A performance comparison of mobility anchor point selection schemes in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 networks. Computer Networks, 51(6), 1630–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumann, F. V., & Niemegeers, I. G. (1999). An evaluation of location management procedures. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on universal personal communications (UPC) 1994, pp. 359–364, August 1994.

  12. Ihara, T., Ohnishi, H., & Takagi, Y. (2000). Mobile IP route optimization method for a carrier-scale IP network. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on complex computer systems (ICECCS) 2000, p. 120, September 2000.

  13. Xie, J., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2002). A novel distributed dynamic location management scheme for minimizing signaling costs in mobile IP. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 1(3), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xie, J., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2002). A distributed dynamic regional location management scheme for mobile IP. In Proceedings of IEEE annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM) 2002, pp. 1069–1078, June 2002.

  15. Lee, J.-H., Lim, H.-J., & Chung, T.-M. (2008). A competent global mobility support scheme in NETLMM. International Journal of Electronics and Communications. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2008.07.010. On-line published August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J.-H., Chung, T.-M., Pack, S., & Gundavelli, S. (2008). Shall we apply paging technologies to Proxy Mobile IPv6? In Proceedings of ACM international workshop on mobility in the evolving internet architecture (MobiArch) 2008, pp. 37–42, August 2008.

  17. Heinzelamn, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) 2000, pp. 3005–3014, January 2000.

  18. Han, Y.-H., & Hwang, S.-H. (2006). Care-of address provisioning for efficient IPv6 mobility support. Computer Communications, 29(9), 1422–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Hyouk Lee.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper has been published in Proc. of IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) 2008, September 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JH., Han, YH., Gundavelli, S. et al. A comparative performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6. Telecommun Syst 41, 279–292 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-009-9163-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-009-9163-z

Keywords

Navigation