Skip to main content
Log in

Cost models for QoS-differentiated interconnecting and wholesale access services in future generation networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, network operators and Internet service providers are offering “Triple Play” products integrating services with different Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. It is leading to Internet traffic with strong service integration under an all-IP-based broadband network platform. However, new multimedia service offers require individual QoS guarantees for each type of services. The interconnection between different providers necessitates the reconsideration of the actual cost schemes. Interconnection and wholesale access services (It is an extension of “wholesale network” definition, where Telco’s physical network and equipment are “shared” to many independent Service Providers. If the incumbent offers broadband access services, the rest of the alternative providers have recourse to the incumbent’s “wholesale access service”. Bitstream service is the most important service of this type, actually regulated over DSL and cable networks.) appear to be a simple solution, but the consideration of QoS parameters requires an extension of the current network dimensioning methods based mainly on the average bandwidth demand from each user. This paper proposes a cost model which considers QoS parameters and, based on the “Total Element based Long Run Incremental Cost” (TELRIC) model, is applied to the wholesale access and interconnection paradigm. Three traffic engineering methods are considered and studied for network dimensioning. Hereby the aim is to guarantee the QoS of the different services: complete traffic segregation under virtual tunnels, complete traffic integration by over-engineering and partial traffic integration using a priority queuing scheme. The proposed method enables the development of a specific cost scheme based on a complete scenario considering different types of users. The variety of used IP applications suppose direct implications over different levels of interconnection, mainly at the low-level Metro access and the high-level edge node.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OFCOM (2005). Next generation networks—future arrangements for access and interconnection, Consultation. http://www.ofcom.org.

  2. Ergas, H. (1998). TSLRIC, TELRIC and other forms of forward looking cost models in telecommunications. In EU competition workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia, A. E., Rodriguez, L., & Hackbarth, K. D. (2010). Application of cost models over traffic dimensioning with QoS restrictions. Annals of Telecommunications Journal. ISSN 0003-4347. doi:10.2007/s12243-009-0153-7.

  4. European Parliament and of the Council (2002). Directive 2002/19/EC. March.

  5. McDysan, D. (2000). QoS & traffic management in IP & ATM networks. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jay, S., & Plueckebaum, T. (2008). Next generation core networks: access, interconnection and competition policy. WIK Newsletter (72), September.

  7. NRIC V (2009). Interoperability focus group. Service provider interconnection for Internet protocol best effort service, p. 7.

  8. Clark, D., Faratin, P., Bauer, S., Lehr, W., Gilmore, P., & Berger, A. (2008). The growing complexity of Internet interconnection. In Communications & strategies number 72, 4th quarter 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodriguez de Lope, L., & Hackbarth, K. (2008). Cost model for bitstream access services with QoS parameters. Socio-economic aspects of next generation Internet. Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS). Special Issue.

  10. Jay, S., Anell, P., Plueckebaum, T., Kulenkampf, G., & Marcus, S. (2008). Next generation bitstream access. WIK—Report for the Commission for Communications Regulation.

  11. Rodriguez, L., Garcia, A. E., Hackbarth, K. D., Plueckebaum, T., & Ilic, D. (2008). Cost models for next generation networks with quality of service parameters. In The 13th international telecommunications network strategy and planning symposium. Networks. Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gelenbe, E., & Pujolle, G. (1998). Introduction to queuing networks (2nd edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Claffy, K. C., Braun, H.-W., & Polyzos, G. C. (1995). A parametrizable methodology for Internet traffic flow profiling. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 13, 1481–1494. Special Issue on the Global Internet

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson, K., Miller, G. J., & Wilder, R. (1997). Wide-area Internet traffic patterns and characteristics. IEEE Network, 11, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) (2006). Final report of the project group Framework for Interconnection in IO-based networks. Bonn. http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/8370.pdf.

  16. Hackbarth, K., Rodriguez, L., Ilic, D., & Kulenkampff, G. (2007). Bottom-up cost modeling for Bitstream services in ATM based broadband access networks. In Communication & strategies. 4 quarter 2007 IDATE, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto E. Garcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, A.E., Rodriguez, L. & Hackbarth, K.D. Cost models for QoS-differentiated interconnecting and wholesale access services in future generation networks. Telecommun Syst 51, 221–231 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9431-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9431-6

Keywords

Navigation