Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid approach for cost-effective media streaming based on prediction of demand in community networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Media streaming applications have recently attracted large number of users in the Internet. This large demand creates a burden on existing infrastructure to sustain the QoS guarantees. The huge capacity resources and power consumption are the main aspects that hinder the evolution of media streaming applications in the Internet. This motivates us to explore new approaches in collaborative media streaming in community networks (e.g., college and office campuses) residing in a larger network of the access connection provider such as Internet Service Provider (ISP). The proposed approaches are aimed at exploiting the redundancy and abundantly available network “micro-resources” in a community network to create an aggregate virtual “macro-resource”. Specifically, the ISP can leverage its control over a large amount of under-utilized micro-resources in a community network to replicate into caches of those micro-resources files that are desired in that community. In this paper, we characterize the evolution of demand in a community network. By using this demand-awareness model (i.e., future prediction of the demand in a community network), micro-resources in the community network can be optimally utilized. We show analytically and using simulations that this approach mitigates the cost of media streaming on both the Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) and ISPs. By allocating micro-resources to manage the demand in a community network on a per-need basis, much of the network and computing capacities at the edge-servers can be alleviated. This reduces the cost on the CDN in terms of both purchase and maintenance. Moreover, ISPs can reduce the bandwidth and power consumption in their networks by pushing the media content closer to users in the community network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cisco Systems Inc. (2007). Data center virtualization and orchestration: Business and financial justification. White paper.

  2. Liu, Y., Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2008). A survey on peer-to-peer video streaming systems. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 18(1), 18–28. doi:10.1007/s12083-007-0006-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cisco Systems Inc. (2010). Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and methodology, 2010–2015. White paper.

  4. Ballani, H., Costa, P., Karagiannis, T., & Rowstron, A. (2011). Towards predictable datacenter networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM conference (pp. 242–253).

  5. Cano, M.-D., & Cerdan, F. (2012). Subjective QoE analysis of VoIP applications in a wireless campus environment. Telecommunication Systems, 49(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, D., Kulkarni, S., Rosenberg, C., & Chai, H.-K. (2006). Analysis of a CDN–P2P hybrid architecture for cost-effective streaming media distribution. Multimedia Systems, 11(4), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwok, S. H., Chan, K. Y., & Cheung, Y. M. (2005). A server-mediated peer-to-peer system. ACM SIGecom Exchange, 5(3), 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hefeeda, M. M., Bhargava, B. K., & Yau, D. K. (2004). A hybrid architecture for cost-effective on-demand media streaming. Computer Networks, 44(3), 353–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Do, T. T., Hua, K. A., & Tantaoui, M. A. (2008). Robust video-on-demand streaming in peer-to-peer environments. Computer Communications, 31(3), 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Z., Lin, C., Yin, H., & Li, B. (2008). On the server placement problem of P2P live media streaming system. In Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim conference on advances in multimedia information processing (pp. 178–187). London: Springer-Verlag.

  11. Shakkottai, S., & Johari, R. (2010). Demand-aware content distribution on the internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 18(2), 476–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, J. Yeo, C. Prabhakaran, V. & Ramchandran, K. (2007). On the role of helpers in peer-to-peer file download systems: Design, analysis and simulation. In Proceedings of the IPTPS’07.

  13. Zhang, H., Wang, J., Chen, M., & Ramchandran, K. (2009). Scaling peer-to-peer video-on-demand systems using helpers. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on image processing.

  14. Karagiannis, T., Broido, A., Brownlee, N., Claffy, K. C., & Faloutsos, M. (2009). Improving the streaming capacity in P2P VoD systems with helpers. In Proceedings of the ICME conference. Los Alamitos: IEEE computer Society Press.

  15. Koumaras, H., Liberal, F., & Sun, L. (2012). Quality of experience issues in multimedia provision. Telecommunication Systems, 49(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jammeh, E., Mkwawa, I., Khan, A., Goudarzi, M., Sun, L., & Ifeachor, E. (2012). Quality of experience (QoE) driven adaptation scheme for voice/video over IP. Telecommunication Systems, 49(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu, D., & Srikant, R. (2004). Modeling and performance analysis of BitTorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM conference.

  18. Pouwelse, J., Garbacki, P., Epema, D. H. J., & Sips, H. (2005). The BitTorrent P2P file-sharing system: Measurements and analysis. In Proceedings of the international workshop on peer-to-peer systems.

  19. Islam, S., Keung, J., Lee, K., & Liu, A. (2012). Empirical prediction models for adaptive resource provisioning in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 28(1), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, Y. C., & Albert, Y. (2010). Zomaya: Rescheduling for reliable job completion with the support of clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 26(8), 1192–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Niu, D., Liu, Z., Li, B., & Zhao, S. (2011). Demand forecast and performance prediction in peer-assisted on-demand streaming systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom conference (pp. 421–425).

  22. Peichang, S., Huaimin, W., Gang, Y., Fengshun, L., & Tianzuo, W. (2012). Prediction-based federated management of multi-scale resources in cloud. AISS: Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 4(6), 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gursun, G., Crovella, M., & Matta, I. (2011). Describing and forecasting video access patterns. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM mini-conference.

  24. Niu, D., Xu, H., Li, B., & Zhao, S. (2012). Quality-assured cloud bandwidth auto-scaling for video-on-demand applications. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM conference (pp. 421–425).

  25. Laoutaris, N., Rodriguez, P., & Massoulie, L. (2008). ECHOS: Edge capacity hosting overlays of nano data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(1), 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alasaad, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Nicanfar, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2012). Green content distribution in wireless mesh networks with infrastructure support. In Proceedings of the ICC workshop on green communications and networking.

  27. Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y.-Y., & Moon, S. (2007). I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the worlds largest user generated content video system. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/USENIX internet measurement conference.

  29. Freedman, M. J., Freudenthal, E., & Mazières, D. (2004). Democratizing content publication with coral. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on symposium on networked systems design and implementation, NSDI’04 (Vol. 1, pp. 18–18). USENIX Association.

  30. Lorincz, J., Capone, A., & Bogarelli, M. (2010). Energy savings in wireless access networks through optimized network management. In Proceedings of ISWPC conference (pp. 449–454).

  31. Chiaraviglio, L., Mellia, M., & Neri, F. (2009). Energy-aware backbone networks: A case study. In Proceedings of the ICC workshops (pp. 1–5).

  32. Banchs, A., Bayer, N., Chieng, D., de la Oliva, A., Gloss, B., Kretschme, M., Natkaniec, S. M., & Zdarsky, F. (2008). CARMEN: Delivering carrier grade services over wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE PIMRC ’08 (pp. 1–6).

  33. Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2005). Wireless mesh networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 47(4), 445–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pirzada, A. A., Portmann, M., & Indulska, J. (2006). Evaluation of multi-radio extensions to AODV for wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the ACM MOBIWAC (pp. 45–51).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology under Grant Number 34-996.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amr Alasaad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alasaad, A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Leung, V.C.M. A hybrid approach for cost-effective media streaming based on prediction of demand in community networks. Telecommun Syst 59, 329–343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9939-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9939-7

Keywords

Navigation