Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Context-aware cooperative testbed for energy analysis in beyond 4G networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexity of heterogeneous wireless networks in synergy with battery powered mobile devices is driving new stringent requirements in terms of power efficiency to ensure that battery life, environmental and thermal criteria can be met. Modern mobile devices are equipped with multiple interfaces, which allow them to exploit the benefits offered by heterogeneous networking environments, but on the other hand, drain battery swiftly. In this paper, architecture for a context-based node and a testbed platform for the analysis of energy consumption of heterogeneous cooperative communications are presented. The demonstrative testbed comprises a WiFi Access Point, which provides WiFi coverage in the infrastructure mode, as well as nodes capable of communicating through short-range ultra-wideband WiMedia. The testbed includes a context aware module that provides and stores information related to different nodes in the system. The paper shows how context information can be used to save the energy of mobile devices and extend their battery lifetime using short-range communications. The testbed is used as a proof-of-concept for the practical implementation of the cooperative communications concept. The obtained results show that significant amount of energy can be saved using context information along cooperation among multiple interfaces, in comparison to direct communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. TNS online report, two-day battery life tops wish list for future all-in-one phone device. http://www.tns.lv/?lang=en&fullarticle=true&category=showuid&id=2288/

  2. GSA, mobile industry actions towards sustainability. (2010, January). http://www.gsacom.com/news/gsa_292.php4

  3. Cano, J.-C., Ferrndez-Bel, D., & Manzoni, P. (2005). Evaluating bluetooth performance as the support for context-aware applications. Telecommunication Systems, 28(3–4), 333–347. doi:10.1007/s11235-004-5576-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daz Snchez, D., Marn Lpez, A., Almenrez Mendoza, F., Campo Vzquez, C., & Garca-Rubio, C. (2007). Context awareness in network selection for dynamic environments. Telecommunication Systems, 36(1—-3), 49–60. doi:10.1007/s11235-007-9058-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matos, R., Sargento, S., Hummel, K., Hess, A., Tutschku, K., & Meer, H. (2012). Context-based wireless mesh networks: a case for network virtualization. Telecommunication Systems, 51(4), 259–272. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9434-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alam, M., Yang, D., Rodriguez, J., & Abd-Alhameed, R. (2014). Secure device-to-device communication in lte-a. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(4), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Device-to-Device (D2D) Communication: Fundamentals with applications to LTE. https://wncg.org/research/briefs/device-device-d2d-communication-fundamentals-applications-lte.

  8. Hossain, D. I. K. E., & Bhargava, V. K. (2010). Cooperative cellular wireless networks. Cambridge: cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Dhahir, N., Fragouli, C., Stamoulis, A., Younis, W., & Calderbank, R. (2002). Space-time processing for broadband wireless access. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(9), 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pabst, R., Walke, B. H., Schultz, D., Herhold, P., Yanikomeroglu, H., Mukherjee, S., et al. (2004). Relay-based deployment concepts for wireless and mobile broadband radio. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(9), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nosratinia, A., Hunter, T., & Hedayat, A. (2004). Cooperative communication in wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(10), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sendonaris, A., Erkip, E., & Aazhang, B. (2003). User cooperation diversity. part ii. implementation aspects and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 51(11), 1939–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laneman, J., Wornell, G. W., & Tse, D. (2001). An efficient protocol for realizing cooperative diversity in wireless networks.” In Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on information theory (p. 294).

  14. Hunter, T., & Nosratinia, A. (2006). Diversity through coded cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 5(2), 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laneman, J., & Wornell, G. (2000). Energy-efficient antenna sharing and relaying for wireless networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Confernce, 1, 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson, P., & Rong, H. (2004). Large-scale cooperative relaying network with optimal coherent combining under aggregate relay power constraints. WWRF: New Air Interfaces, Relay based Systems and Smart Antennas. qc 20120203.

  17. Nomikos, N., Nieto, A., Makris, P., Skoutas, D. N., Vouyioukas, D., Rizomiliotis, P., et al. (2015). Relay selection for secure 5g green communications. Telecommunication Systems, 59(1), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schilit, B., & Theimer, M. (1994). Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Network, 8(5), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baecker, R. M. (1995). Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 97–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, G., Li, M., & Kotz, D. (2004). Design and implementation of a large-scale context fusion network. In IEEE the first annual international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: Networking and services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004 (pp. 246–255).

  22. Zin, M. S. I. M., & Hope, M. (2010). A review of uwb mac protocols. In IEEE sixth advanced international conference on telecommunications (AICT), 2010 (pp. 526–534).

  23. “Ecma-368: High rate ultra wideband phy and mac standard (3rd ed.). (2008).

  24. Muqattash, A. H., & Heidari-Bateni, G. (2006). Dynamic power save modes,” Dec. 22 2006, US Patent App. 11/615, 304.

  25. Chen, Y., Smavatkul, N., & Emeott, S. (2004). “Power management for voip over ieee 802.11 wlan.” In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, 2004. WCNC. 2004, vol. 3., (pp. 1648–1653).

  26. Alliance, W.-F. (2005). Wmm power save for mobile and portable wi-fi certified devices. Austin: Wi-Fi Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abouelseoud, M., & Nosratinia, A. (2013). Heterogeneous relay selection. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12, 1735–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., Vucetic, B., Chen, Z., & Yuan, J. (2007). An improved relay selection scheme with hybrid relaying protocols. In IEEE global telecommunications conference, 2007. GLOBECOM’07. (pp. 3704–3708).

  29. Fricke, J., Butt, M., & Hoeher, P. (2008). Quality-oriented adaptive forwarding for wireless relaying. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(3), 200–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, T., Song, L., Li, Y., Huo, Q., & Jiao, B. (2012). Performance analysis of hybrid relay selection in cooperative wireless systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(3), 779–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bao, X., & Li, J. (2007). Efficient message relaying for wireless user cooperation: Decode-amplify-forward (daf) and hybrid daf and coded-cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(11), 3975–3984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong, M., Hwang, S., Kim, D., & Yang, J. (2011). Performance analysis of cooperative communication with heterogeneous relays. In IEEE 22nd international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 1104–1108).

  33. Lusina, P., Schober, R., & Lampe, L. (2008). Diversity-multiplexing trade-off of the hybrid non-orthogonal amplify-decode and forward protocol. In IEEE international symposium on information theory, 2008. ISIT 2008. (pp. 2375–2379).

  34. Yang, S., & Belfiore, J.-C. (2007). Towards the optimal amplify-and-forward cooperative diversity scheme. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 53(9), 3114–3126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, L., & Li, F. (2013). Adaptive protocol for cooperative communication systems with a single semi-blind amplify-and-forward relay. Telecommunication Systems, 53, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Falowo, O., & Chan, H. (2011). Effect of mobile terminal heterogeneity on call blocking/dropping probability in cooperative heterogeneous cellular networks. Telecommunication Systems, 47(3—-4), 337–349. doi:10.1007/s11235-010-9322-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Afghah, F., Razi, A., & Abedi, A. (2013). Stochastic game theoretical model for packet forwarding in relay networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 1877–1893. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9471-y.

  38. Wrona, K., & Mhnen, P. (2004). Analytical model of cooperation in ad hoc networks. Telecommunication Systems, 27(2—-4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nomikos, N., Skoutas, D. N., Vouyioukas, D., Verikoukis, C., & Skianis, C. (2014). Capacity maximization through energy-aware multi-mode relaying. Wireless Personal Communications, 74(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lim, G., & Cimini, L, Jr. (2012). Energy-efficient cooperative relaying in heterogeneous radio access networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1, 476–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Choi, Y., Kim, H., Han, S.-W., & Han, Y. (2010). Joint resource allocation for parallel multi-radio access in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(11), 3324–3329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Choi, Y., Lee, Y., & Cioffi, J. M. (2011). Optimization of cooperative inter-operability in heterogeneous networks with cognitive ability. Communications Letters, IEEE, 15(11), 1178–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahn, C. W., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). Wireless cooperative communication: A survey. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication (p. 78) ACM.

  44. Laneman, J. N., & Wornell, G. W. (2000). Energy-efficient antenna sharing and relaying for wireless networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking confernce, 2000. WCNC. 2000 vol. 1. (pp. 7–12).

  45. Li, X. J., Seet, B.-C., & Chong, P. H. J. (2008). Multihop cellular networks: Technology and economics. Computer Networks, 52(9), 1825–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hasan, Z., Boostanimehr, H., & Bhargava, V. K. (2011). Green cellular networks: A survey, some research issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(4), 524–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alam, M., Albano, M., Radwan, A., & Rodriguez, J. (2015). Candi: context-aware node discovery for short-range cooperation. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 26(5), 861–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu, P., Tao, Z., Narayanan, S., Korakis, T., & Panwar, S. S. (2007). Coopmac: A cooperative mac for wireless lans. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(2), 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Y., Huang, L., Xu, H., & Yang, Z. (2013). An incentive energy-efficient routing for data gathering in wireless cooperative networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52, 1977–1987. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9478-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Feng, J., Zhang, R., Ng, S. X., & Hanzo, L. (2011). Relay selection for energy-efficient cooperative media access control. In IEEE wireless communications & networking conference (WCNC), 2011 IEEE (pp. 287–292).

  51. Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2013). Saving energy and improving communications using cooperative group-based wireless sensor networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2489–2502. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9568-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Makris, P., Skoutas, D. N., & Skianis, C. (2013). A survey on context-aware mobile and wireless networking: On networking and computing environments’ integration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(1), 362–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodriguez, J., Marques, P., Radwan, A., Moessner, K., Tafazolli, R., Raspopoulos, M., Stavrou, S., Trapps, P., Noquet, D., Sithamparanathan, K. et al. (2010). Cognitive radio and cooperative strategies for power saving in multi-standard wireless devices. In IEEE future network and mobile summit, 2010 (pp. 1–8).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework. [FP7/2007-2013] under Grant Agreement Number 248577 [C2POWER] and the Ph.D. Grant of the Fundao para a Cincia e a Tecnologia (FCT) of Portugal, reference: SFRH / BD / 67027 / 2009. The authors would also like to thank Veebeam Ltd for the contribution in testbed development and providing results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Alam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, M., Trapps, P., Mumtaz, S. et al. Context-aware cooperative testbed for energy analysis in beyond 4G networks. Telecommun Syst 64, 225–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0171-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0171-5

Keywords

Navigation