Abstract
This paper analyses the performance of proposed cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) network in Weibull fading environment. First, we have derived the novel analytic expressions for probabilities of missed detection and false alarm in Weibull fading channel, assuming an improved energy detector (IED), selection combining diversity scheme and multiple antennas at each cognitive radio (CRs). Next, performance is analyzed using complementary receiver operating characteristics curves, total error rate, average channel throughput, and network utility function curves for the proposed CSS network. The optimal performance of CSS network is achieved by optimizing the CSS network parameters. The closed form of expressions for the optimum value of number of CRs, arbitrary power of received signal, and detection threshold at each CR are derived using OR-Rule and AND-Rule at fusion center (FC). The average channel throughput and network utility function analysis are evaluated using \(k=1+n\) and \(k=N-n\) fusion rules at FC. Finally, the impact of several network parameters such as, multiple antennas at each CR (M), number of CRs (N) in CSS network, Weibull fading parameter (V), arbitrary power of received signal (p), and sensing channel SNR (\({\bar{\gamma }})\) on the performance of proposed CSS network are investigated using the simulation results. The performance comparison between conventional energy detector and an IED has been highlighted with the simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Federal Communications Commission. (2002). Spectrum policy task force. ET Docket 02-135
Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18.
Cabric, D., Mishra, S. M., & Brodersen, R. W. B. (2004) Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In Proceedings of the Asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers (Vol. 1, pp. 772–776).
Urkowitz, H. (1967). Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals. Proceedings of the IEEE, 55(4), 523–31.
Digham, F. F., Alouini, S.. & Simon, M. K. (2003). On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications (ICC’03), Alaska, USA (pp. 3575–3579).
Ganesan, G., & Li, Y. G. (2005). Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE symp. new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN’05), Baltimore, USA (pp. 137–143).
Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2005). Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments. In Proceedings of 1st IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access network, Baltimore, USA (pp. 131–136).
Atawi, I. E., et al. (2016). Spectrum-sensing in cognitive radio networks over composite multipath/shadowed fading channels. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 52, 337–348.
Darawsheh, Hikmat Y., & Jamoos, Ali. (2014). Performance analysis of energy detector over \(\alpha -\mu \) fading channels with selection combining. Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal archive, 77(2), 1507–1517.
Lopez, M. B., & Casadevall, F. (2012). Improved energy detection spectrum sensing for cognitive radio. IET Communications, 6(8), 785–796.
Chen, Y. (2005). Improved energy detector for random signals in Gaussian noise. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(2), 558–563.
Sadhukhan, P., Kumar, N., & Bhatnagar, M. R. (2013). Improved energy detector based spectrum sensing for cognitive radio: An experimental study. In Proceedings of IEEE India conference (INDICON’13), Mumbai, India (pp. 1–5).
Zhang, W., Mallik, R. K., & Letaief, K. B. (2009). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing with energy detection in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(12), 5761–5766.
Singh, A., Bhatnagar, M. R., & Mallik, R. K. (2011). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing with an improved energy detector over imperfect reporting channel. In Proceedings of IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall).
Singh, A., Bhatnagar, M. R., & Mallik, R. K. (2012). Cooperative spectrum sensing in multiple antenna based cognitive radio network using an improved energy detector. IEEE Communications Letters, 16(1), 64–67.
Shi-Qi, L., & Bin-Jie, H. (2014). Cooperative spectrum sensing based on improved energy detector for cognitive radios. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference ICSPCC’14, Guilin (pp. 1–4).
Ranjeeth, M., & Anuradha, S. (2016). Threshold based censoring of cognitive radios in Rician fading channel. Wireless Personal Communications, 93(2), 409–430.
Ranjeeth, M., Behera, S., Nallagonda, S. & Anuradha, S. (2016). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing based on improved energy detector with selection diversity in AWGN and Rayleigh Fading. In Proceedings of ICEEOT’2016, Chennai, India (pp. 1–5).
Ranjeeth, M., Behera, S., & Anuradha, S. (2016). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing network with multiple antenna in Nakagami-m fading channel using improved energy detector. In Proceedings of ICCSP-2016, Chennai, India (pp. 1410–1414).
Ranjeeth, M., Behera, S., & Anuradha, S. (2016). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing network with multiple antenna in Weibull fading channel using improved energy detector. In Proceedings of ICCSP-2016, Chennai, India (pp. 1360–1364).
Ranjeeth, M., Nallagonda, S., & Anuradha, S. (2017). Optimization analysis of improved energy detection based cooperative spectrum sensing network in Nakagami-m and Weibull fading channels. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 10(2), 114–121.
Sofotasios, P. C., Fikadu, M. K., Ho-Van, K., & Valkama, M. (2013). Energy detection sensing of unknown signals over Weibull fading conditions. In International conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC-2013) (pp. 414–419).
Liang, Y. C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E., & Hoang, A. T. (2008). Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(4), 1326–1337.
Stotas, S., & Nallanathan, A. (2012). On the throughput and spectrum senisng enhancement of opportunistic spectrum access cognitive radio network. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(1), 97–107.
Bhanavathu, N. R., & Khan, M. Z. A. (2016). On throughput maximization of cognitive radio using cooperative spectrum sensing over erroneous control channel. In Conference on communication NCC (pp. 1–6).
Suwen W., Ming Z., & Jinkang Z. (2009). Optimal number of secondary users through maximizing utility in cooperative spectrum sening. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC Fall) (pp. 634–639).
Ranjeeth, M., & Anuradha, S. (2017). Throughput analysis in cooperative spectrum sensing network with an improved energy detector. In Proceedings of international conference PIERS-2017, Singapore.
Hu, H., Zhang, H., Yu, H., Chen, Y., & Jafarian, J. (2015). Energy efficient design of channel sensing in cognitive radio networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering (Elsevier), 42, 207–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Expression for threshold value
The closed form of expression for threshold value using the multiple antennas at each CR can be calculated with the help of Eq. (18). Applying logarithm on both sides to Eq. (18) then it reduces to:
1.2 Optimization of CSS network parameters
1.2.1 A: Optimization of threshold value using \(P_f \) and \(P_m \) expressions:
An optimum value of threshold (\(\lambda _{opt} \)) is required to decide the existance of PU with minimum threshold value. The closed form of expression for optimum value of threshold for single antenna case can be calculated by differentiate Eqs. (9 and 17) w.r.t to \(\uplambda \):
1.2.2 B: Optimization of arbitrary power of received signal (p) using \(P_f \) and \(P_m \) expressions:
It is also necessary to optimize the arbitrary power of the received signal. The optimum value of p (\(p_{opt} \)) can be calculated by differentiating Eqs. (9) and (17) w.r.t p for a single antenna case:
adding Eqs. (69) and (70), then make equal to zero.
1.3 Optimization of network parameters using OR-Rule at FC
1.3.1 a: Optimization of number of CRs \((N_{opt} ):\)
The closed form of expression for \(N_{opt} \) value for OR-Rule can be calculated using Eq. (33) as follows:
Total error rate: \(\hbox {Z}(\hbox {N})=Q_m +Q_f \)
after simplification, the above expression reduces to
applying logarithm on both sides, finally, the closed form of expression for \(N_{opt} \) using OR-Rule at FC is
1.3.2 b: Optimization of threshold value \(\left( {\lambda _{opt} } \right) \)
The closed form of expression for \(\lambda _{opt} \) value can be calculated by differentiating Eq. (33) w.r.t to \(\uplambda \), and equating to zero.
For a single antenna case (\(M=1\)), \({\partial P_f }\big /{\partial \lambda }\) and \({\partial P_m }\big /{\partial \lambda }\) expressions are given in Eq. (24), substituting Eqs. (24) in (75):
after some algebric simplifications, above equation reduces to
applying logarithm on both sides and solving algebric expressions, the above expression reduces to
1.3.3 c: Optimization of arbitrary power of the received siganl \(\left( {p_{opt} } \right) \)
The closed form of expression for \(p_{opt} \) can be calculated by differentiating Eq. (33) w.r.t to p,
For a single antenna case (\(M=1\)), \({\partial P_f }\big /{\partial p}\) and \({\partial P_m }\big /{\partial p}\) expressions are given in Eqs. (28) and (29), substituting these equations in Eq. (78):
after some algebric simplifications, above equation reduces to
applying logarithm on both sides and solving algebric expressions, the above expression reduces to
apply logarithm on both sides, after simplification, the closed form of expression for \(p_{opt} \) is:
1.4 Optimization of network parameters using AND-Rule at FC
1.4.1 a: Optimization of threshold value \(\left( {\lambda _{opt} } \right) \)
The closed form of expression for \(\lambda _{opt} \) value can be calculated using Eqs. (24), (35), (38) and (39):
after some algebric simplifications, above equation reduces to
applying logarithm on both sides and solving algebric expressions, the above expression reduces to
1.4.2 b: Optimization of arbitrary power of the received siganl \(\left( {p_{opt} } \right) \)
The closed form of expression for \(p_{opt} \) value can be calculated using Eqs. (35), (42), (43), (28) and (29):
after some algebric simplifications, above equation reduces to
applying logarithm on both sides and solving algebric expressions, the above expression reduces to
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ranjeeth, M., Anuradha, S. The effect of Weibull fading channel on cooperative spectrum sensing network using an improved energy detector. Telecommun Syst 68, 493–512 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0405-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0405-1