Skip to main content
Log in

Detecting and Handling Unreliable Points for Camera Parameter Estimation

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The popularly used DLT method sometimes fails to give reliable camera parameter estimation. It is therefore important to detect the unreliability and provide the corresponding solutions. Based on a complete framework of invariance for six points, we construct two evaluation functions to detect the unreliability. The two evaluation functions do not involve any computations for the camera projective matrix or optical center and thus are efficient to perform the detection. Then, the guidelines corresponding to the different detection results are presented. In particular, a filtering RANSAC method to remove the detected unreliable points is provided. The filtering RANSAC proves to be successful in removing the unreliable points even if these points are of a large proportion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Aziz, Y. I., & Karara, H. M. (1971). Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In Proceedings of the ASP/UI symposium on close range photogrammetry (pp. 1–18).

  • Bayro-Corrochano, E., & Banarer, V. (2002). A geometric approach for the theory and applications of 3D projective invariants. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 16(2), 131–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, T. (1992). The projection of six points from 2-space and 3-space. Preprint, Eberstadt, Troyesstr. 78, D-6100 Darmstadt, Germany. http://www.iks.hs-merseburg.de/~buchanan/pubs/Coble.pdf.

  • Carlsson, S. (1995). View variation and linear invariants in 2-D and 3-D (Tech. Rep. ISRN KTH/NA/P–95/22–SE), December 1995.

  • Carlsson, S. (1998). Symmetry in perspective. In ECCV (pp. 249–263).

  • Coble, A. B. (1922). Associated sets of points. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 24(1), 1–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2000). Pattern classification. (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förstner, W. (1987). Reliability analysis of parameter estimation in linear models with applications to mensuration problems in computer vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 40(3), 273–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2000). Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, F., & Henrion, D. (2007). Globally optimal estimates for geometric reconstruction problems. International Journal of Computer Vision, 74(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan, L. (1995). Invariants of six points and projective reconstruction from three uncalibrated images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 17(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple, J., & Kneebone, G. (1952). Algebraic projective geometry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slama, C. (1980). Manual of photogrammetry (4th ed.). Falls Church: American Society of Photogrammetry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, I. E. (1963). Sketchpad: a man-machine graphical communications system (Technical report 296). MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Also published by Garland publishing, New York (1980).

  • Weng, J., Huang, T. S., & Ahuja, N. (1989). Motion and structure from two perspective views: algorithms, error analysis, and error estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(5), 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H. (2001). Bracket algebra, affine bracket algebra, and automated geometric theorem proving. PhD dissertation, Institute of Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.

  • Wu, Y. H., & Hu, Z. Y. (2003). The invariant representations of a quadric cone and a twisted cubic. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, 25(10), 1329–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H., & Hu, Z. Y. (2005). A unified and complete framework of invariance for six points. In H. Li, P. J. Olver, & G. Sommer (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science : Vol. 3519. Computer algebra and geometric algebra with applications (pp. 403–417). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. H., & Hu, Z. Y. (2006). A robust method to recognize critical configuration for camera calibration. Image and Vision Computing, 24(12), 1313–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yihong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Li, Y. & Hu, Z. Detecting and Handling Unreliable Points for Camera Parameter Estimation. Int J Comput Vis 79, 209–223 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0114-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0114-4

Keywords

Navigation