Skip to main content
Log in

Time Efficient DT-MRI Acquisition Parameters for Robust Estimation of Fiber Tracts

Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate optimal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisition parameters including the number of diffusion encoding directions (K), the number of excitations at each direction (N e ) and diffusion weighting (b-value). A time efficiency measure is proposed for parameter optimization to achieve the best compromise between the accuracy of estimated fiber tracts and scan time in spin echo single shot echo-planar imaging (EPI). By simulation with four synthetic datasets, we conclude that six encoding directions and one excitation give the highest time efficiency when single image SNR0 measured at b-value= 191.14 mm − 2 s is larger than 32. The optimal number of excitations increases to two when SNR0 is smaller than 32. Further increase of K and N e would decrease time efficiency. And the optimal b-value decreases as SNR0 increases. Finally, we validate the findings by comparing the time efficiency of two sets of acquisition parameters using real dataset, and marked lift is observed when the optimal set is applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

References

  1. Stejskal, E. O., & Tanner, J. E. (1965). Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presenceof a time-dependent field gradient. Journal of Chemical Physics, 42, 288–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Melhem, E. R., Mori, S., & Mukundan, G. (2002). Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain and white matter tractography. AJR, 178, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Torrey, H. C. (1956). Block equations with diffusion terms. Physical Review, 104, 563–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasan, K. M. (2007). A framework for quality control and parameter optimization in diffusion tensor imaging: Theoretical analysis and validation. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 25, 1196–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Melhem, E. R., Itoh, R., Jones, L., Barker, P. B., Jones, L., & Barker, P. B. (2000). Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: Effect of diffusion weighting on trace and anisotropy measurements. AJNR, 21, 1813–1820.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burdette, J. H., Elster, A. D., & Ricci, P. E. (1998). Calculation of apparent diffusion coefficients in brain using two-point and six-point methods. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 22, 792–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasan, K. M., Parker, D. L., & Alexander, A. L. (2001). Comparison of gradient encoding schmes for diffusion-tensor MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13, 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, D. K. (2004). The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 51, 807–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, D. K., Horsfield, M. A., & Simmons, A. (1999). Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 42, 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leemans, A., Sijbers, J., Verhoye, M., Van der Linden, A., & Van Dyck, D. (2005). Mathematical framework for simulating diffusion tensor MR neural fiber bundles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 53, 944–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mori, S., Crain, B. J., Chacko, V. P., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (1999). Three dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Neurology, 45, 265-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazar, M., & Alexander, A. L. (2003). An error analysis of white matter tractography methods: Synthetic diffusion tensor field simulations. NeuroImage, 20, 1140–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Otsu, N. (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofer, S., & Fraham, J. (2006). Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited-comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuro Image, 32, 989–994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pajevic, S., Aldroubi, A., & Basser, P. J. (2002). A continuous tensor field approximation of discrete DT-MRI Data for extracting microstructural and architectural features of tissue. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 154, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasan, K. M. (2005). DTI parameter optimization at 3.0T: Potential application in entire normal brain mapping and multiple sclerosis research. Medicamundi, 49, 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, B., Rajapakse, J.C. Time Efficient DT-MRI Acquisition Parameters for Robust Estimation of Fiber Tracts. J Sign Process Syst Sign Image Video Technol 54, 25–31 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0192-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0192-8

Keywords

Navigation