Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Brain Deformation During Surgery Using Finite Element Method: Optimization and Comparison of Two Linear Models

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses estimation of brain deformation during craniotomy using finite element modeling. Two mechanical models are optimized and compared for this purpose: linear solid-mechanic model and linear elastic model. Both models assume the realistic finite deformation of the brain after opening the skull. In this study, we use pre-operative and intra-operative magnetic resonance images (MRI) of five patients undergoing brain tumor surgery. Anatomical landmarks are identified by an expert radiologist on MRI and used for the method development and comparison studies. We use tetrahedral finite element meshes and optimize model parameters by minimizing the mean distance between the predicted locations of the anatomical landmarks using the pre-operative images and their actual locations on the intra-operative images. Evaluation of the objective function using a second set of landmarks not used in the optimization process suggests that accuracy of the solid mechanic model is higher than that of the elastic model for our application. Visual inspection of the results confirms this conclusion. The proposed method along with the location information of the surface landmarks measured in the operating room and marked on the pre-operative images can be used to estimate the brain deformations without needing intra-operative images. In this case, since the parameters of the brain tissue are not the same for different patients, the proposed optimization process is crucial for obtaining accurate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wittek, A., Miller, K., Laporte, J., Kikinis, R., & Warfield, S. (2004). Computing reaction forces on surgical tools for robotic neurosurgery and surgical simulation. Canberra: CD Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation ACRA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, K. (2005). Method of testing very soft biological tissues in compression. Journal of Biomechanics, 38, 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miga, M. I., Paulsen, K. D., Hoopes, P. J., Kennedy, F. E., Hartov, J. A., & Roberts, D. W. (2000). In Vivo quantification of a homogeneous brain deformation model for updating preoperative images during surgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 47, 266–273 Feb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumpuri, P., Thompson, R. C., Dawant, B. M., Cao, A., & Miga, M. I. (2007). An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: Preliminary results. Medical Image Analysis, 11, 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Platenik, L. A., Miga, M. I., Roberts, D. W., Lunn, K. E., Kennedy, F. E., Hartov, A., et al. (2002). In vivo quantification of retraction deformation modeling for updated image-guidance during neurosurgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49, 823–835 Aug.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clatz, O., Delingette, H., Talos, I. F., Golby, A. J., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F. A., et al. (2005). Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24, 1417–1427 Nov.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paulsen, K. D., Miga, M. I., Kennedy, F. E., Hoopes, P. J., Hartov, A., & Roberts, D. W. (1999). A computational model for tracking subsurface tissue deformation during stereotactic neurosurgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46, 213–225 Feb.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulsen, K. D., Miga, M. I., Roberts, D. W., Kennedy, F. E., Platenik, L. A., Lunn, K. E., et al. (2001). Finite element modeling of tissue retraction and resection for preoperative neuroimage compension with surgery. Medical Imaging 2001: Visualization, Display, and Image-guided Procedures, 2, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miga, M. I., Sinha, T. K., Cash, D. M., Galloway, R. L., & Weil, R. J. (2003). Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22, 973–985 Aug.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrant, M., Nabavi, A., Macq, B., Black, P. M., Jolesz, F. A., Kikinis, R., et al. (2002). Serial registration of intraoperative MR images of the brain. Medical Image Analysis, 6, 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrant, M., Nabavi, A., Macq, B., Jolesz, F. A., Kikinis, R., & Warfield, S. K. (2001). Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite element biomechanical model. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20, 1384–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bathe, K. J. (1996). Finite element procedures. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wittek, A., Miller, K., Kikinis, R., & Warfield, S. K. Patient-specific model of brain deformation: Application to medical image registration. Journal of Biomechanics, in press, Accepted 27 February 2006.

  14. Wittek, A., Kikinis, R., Warfield, S. K., & Miller, K. (2005). Computation using a fully nonlinear biomechanical model. Proceedings of MICCAI 2005, LNCS (vol. 3750, pp. 583–590). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miga, M. I., Paulsen, K. D., Lemery, J. M., Eisner, S. D., Hartov, A., Kennedy, F. E., et al. (1999). Model-updated image guidance: Initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18, 866–874 Oct.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lunn, K. E., Paulsen, K. D., Liu, F., Kennedy, F. E., Hartov, A., & Roberts, D. W. (2006). Data-guided brain deformation modeling: evaluation of a 3-D adjoint inversion method in porcine studies. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53(10), 1893–1900 Oct.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Patient-specific geometric data for the brain were obtained from pre- and intra-operative MRI studies of patients undergoing brain tumor surgery at the Surgical Planning Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. The authors gratefully acknowledge and thank Prof. Ron Kikinis and Dr. Tina Kapur for providing this crucial data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamidian, H., Soltanian-Zadeh, H., Faraji-Dana, R. et al. Estimating Brain Deformation During Surgery Using Finite Element Method: Optimization and Comparison of Two Linear Models. J Sign Process Syst Sign Image Video Technol 55, 157–167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0195-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-008-0195-5

Keywords

Navigation